Cargando…

A computational model of pig ventricular cardiomyocyte electrophysiology and calcium handling: Translation from pig to human electrophysiology

The pig is commonly used as an experimental model of human heart disease, including for the study of mechanisms of arrhythmia. However, there exist differences between human and porcine cellular electrophysiology: The pig action potential (AP) has a deeper phase-1 notch, a longer duration at 50% rep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaur, Namit, Qi, Xiao-Yan, Benoist, David, Bernus, Olivier, Coronel, Ruben, Nattel, Stanley, Vigmond, Edward J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8277015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34191797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009137
Descripción
Sumario:The pig is commonly used as an experimental model of human heart disease, including for the study of mechanisms of arrhythmia. However, there exist differences between human and porcine cellular electrophysiology: The pig action potential (AP) has a deeper phase-1 notch, a longer duration at 50% repolarization, and higher plateau potentials than human. Ionic differences underlying the AP include larger rapid delayed-rectifier and smaller inward-rectifier K(+)-currents (I(Kr) and I(K1) respectively) in humans. AP steady-state rate-dependence and restitution is steeper in pigs. Porcine Ca(2+) transients can have two components, unlike human. Although a reliable computational model for human ventricular myocytes exists, one for pigs is lacking. This hampers translation from results obtained in pigs to human myocardium. Here, we developed a computational model of the pig ventricular cardiomyocyte AP using experimental datasets of the relevant ionic currents, Ca(2+)-handling, AP shape, AP duration restitution, and inducibility of triggered activity and alternans. To properly capture porcine Ca(2+) transients, we introduced a two-step process with a faster release in the t-tubular region, followed by a slower diffusion-induced release from a non t-tubular subcellular region. The pig model behavior was compared with that of a human ventricular cardiomyocyte (O’Hara-Rudy) model. The pig, but not the human model, developed early afterdepolarizations (EADs) under block of I(K1), while I(Kr) block led to EADs in the human but not in the pig model. At fast rates (pacing cycle length = 400 ms), the human cell model was more susceptible to spontaneous Ca(2+) release-mediated delayed afterdepolarizations (DADs) and triggered activity than pig. Fast pacing led to alternans in human but not pig. Developing species-specific models incorporating electrophysiology and Ca(2+-)handling provides a tool to aid translating antiarrhythmic and arrhythmogenic assessment from the bench to the clinic.