Cargando…

Non-topographic current contrast in scanning field emission microscopy

In scanning field emission microscopy (SFEM), a tip (the source) is approached to few (or a few tens of) nanometres distance from a surface (the collector) and biased to field-emit electrons. In a previous study (Zanin et al. 2016 Proc. R. Soc. A 472, 20160475. (doi:10.1098/rspa.2016.0475)), the fie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bertolini, G., Gürlü, O., Pröbsting, R., Westholm, D., Wei, J., Ramsperger, U., Zanin, D. A., Cabrera, H., Pescia, D., Xanthakis, J. P., Schnedler, M., Dunin-Borkowski, R. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8278050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210511
_version_ 1783722184949104640
author Bertolini, G.
Gürlü, O.
Pröbsting, R.
Westholm, D.
Wei, J.
Ramsperger, U.
Zanin, D. A.
Cabrera, H.
Pescia, D.
Xanthakis, J. P.
Schnedler, M.
Dunin-Borkowski, R. E.
author_facet Bertolini, G.
Gürlü, O.
Pröbsting, R.
Westholm, D.
Wei, J.
Ramsperger, U.
Zanin, D. A.
Cabrera, H.
Pescia, D.
Xanthakis, J. P.
Schnedler, M.
Dunin-Borkowski, R. E.
author_sort Bertolini, G.
collection PubMed
description In scanning field emission microscopy (SFEM), a tip (the source) is approached to few (or a few tens of) nanometres distance from a surface (the collector) and biased to field-emit electrons. In a previous study (Zanin et al. 2016 Proc. R. Soc. A 472, 20160475. (doi:10.1098/rspa.2016.0475)), the field-emitted current was found to change by approximately 1% at a monatomic surface step (approx. 200 pm thick). Here we prepare surface domains of adjacent different materials that, in some instances, have a topographic contrast smaller than 15 pm. Nevertheless, we observe a contrast in the field-emitted current as high as 10%. This non-topographic collector material dependence is a yet unexplored degree of freedom calling for a new understanding of the quantum mechanical tunnelling barrier at the source site that takes into account the properties of the material at the collector site.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8278050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82780502021-07-21 Non-topographic current contrast in scanning field emission microscopy Bertolini, G. Gürlü, O. Pröbsting, R. Westholm, D. Wei, J. Ramsperger, U. Zanin, D. A. Cabrera, H. Pescia, D. Xanthakis, J. P. Schnedler, M. Dunin-Borkowski, R. E. R Soc Open Sci Physics and Biophysics In scanning field emission microscopy (SFEM), a tip (the source) is approached to few (or a few tens of) nanometres distance from a surface (the collector) and biased to field-emit electrons. In a previous study (Zanin et al. 2016 Proc. R. Soc. A 472, 20160475. (doi:10.1098/rspa.2016.0475)), the field-emitted current was found to change by approximately 1% at a monatomic surface step (approx. 200 pm thick). Here we prepare surface domains of adjacent different materials that, in some instances, have a topographic contrast smaller than 15 pm. Nevertheless, we observe a contrast in the field-emitted current as high as 10%. This non-topographic collector material dependence is a yet unexplored degree of freedom calling for a new understanding of the quantum mechanical tunnelling barrier at the source site that takes into account the properties of the material at the collector site. The Royal Society 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8278050/ /pubmed/34295530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210511 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Physics and Biophysics
Bertolini, G.
Gürlü, O.
Pröbsting, R.
Westholm, D.
Wei, J.
Ramsperger, U.
Zanin, D. A.
Cabrera, H.
Pescia, D.
Xanthakis, J. P.
Schnedler, M.
Dunin-Borkowski, R. E.
Non-topographic current contrast in scanning field emission microscopy
title Non-topographic current contrast in scanning field emission microscopy
title_full Non-topographic current contrast in scanning field emission microscopy
title_fullStr Non-topographic current contrast in scanning field emission microscopy
title_full_unstemmed Non-topographic current contrast in scanning field emission microscopy
title_short Non-topographic current contrast in scanning field emission microscopy
title_sort non-topographic current contrast in scanning field emission microscopy
topic Physics and Biophysics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8278050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210511
work_keys_str_mv AT bertolinig nontopographiccurrentcontrastinscanningfieldemissionmicroscopy
AT gurluo nontopographiccurrentcontrastinscanningfieldemissionmicroscopy
AT probstingr nontopographiccurrentcontrastinscanningfieldemissionmicroscopy
AT westholmd nontopographiccurrentcontrastinscanningfieldemissionmicroscopy
AT weij nontopographiccurrentcontrastinscanningfieldemissionmicroscopy
AT ramspergeru nontopographiccurrentcontrastinscanningfieldemissionmicroscopy
AT zaninda nontopographiccurrentcontrastinscanningfieldemissionmicroscopy
AT cabrerah nontopographiccurrentcontrastinscanningfieldemissionmicroscopy
AT pesciad nontopographiccurrentcontrastinscanningfieldemissionmicroscopy
AT xanthakisjp nontopographiccurrentcontrastinscanningfieldemissionmicroscopy
AT schnedlerm nontopographiccurrentcontrastinscanningfieldemissionmicroscopy
AT duninborkowskire nontopographiccurrentcontrastinscanningfieldemissionmicroscopy