Cargando…
Patient complaints in general practice seen through the lens of professionalism: a retrospective observational study
BACKGROUND: Professionalism is a key competence for physicians. Patient complaints provide a unique insight into patient expectations regarding professionalism. Research exploring the exact nature of patient complaints in general practice, especially focused on professionalism, is limited. AIM: To c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of General Practitioners
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8278513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33589467 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0168 |
_version_ | 1783722276605132800 |
---|---|
author | Barnhoorn, Pieter C Essers, Geurt TJM Nierkens, Vera Numans, Mattijs E van Mook, Walther NKA Kramer, Anneke WM |
author_facet | Barnhoorn, Pieter C Essers, Geurt TJM Nierkens, Vera Numans, Mattijs E van Mook, Walther NKA Kramer, Anneke WM |
author_sort | Barnhoorn, Pieter C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Professionalism is a key competence for physicians. Patient complaints provide a unique insight into patient expectations regarding professionalism. Research exploring the exact nature of patient complaints in general practice, especially focused on professionalism, is limited. AIM: To characterise patient complaints in primary care and to explore in more detail which issues with professionalism exist. DESIGN & SETTING: A retrospective observational study in which all unsolicited patient complaints to a representative out-of-hours general practice (OOH GP) service provider in The Netherlands were analysed over a 10-year period (2009–2019). METHOD: Complaints were coded for general characteristics and thematically categorised using the CanMEDS Physician Competency Framework (CanMEDS) as sensitising concepts. Complaints categorised as professionalism were subdivided using open coding. RESULTS: Out of 746 996 patient consultations (telephone, face-to-face, and home visits) 484 (0.065%) resulted in eligible complaint letters. The majority consisted of two or more complaints, resulting in 833 different complaints. Most complaints concerned GPs (80%); a minority (19%) assistants. Thirty-five per cent concerned perceived professionalism lapses of physicians. A rich diversity in the wording of professionalism lapses was found, where ' not being taken seriously ' was mentioned most often. Forty-five per cent related to medical expertise, such as missed diagnoses or unsuccessful clinical treatment. Nineteen per cent related to management problems, especially waiting times and access to care. Communication issues were only explicitly mentioned in 1% of the complaints. CONCLUSION: Most unsolicited patient complaints were related to clinical problems. A third, however, concerned professionalism issues. Not being taken seriously was the most frequent mentioned theme within the professionalism category. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8278513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Royal College of General Practitioners |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82785132021-07-27 Patient complaints in general practice seen through the lens of professionalism: a retrospective observational study Barnhoorn, Pieter C Essers, Geurt TJM Nierkens, Vera Numans, Mattijs E van Mook, Walther NKA Kramer, Anneke WM BJGP Open Research BACKGROUND: Professionalism is a key competence for physicians. Patient complaints provide a unique insight into patient expectations regarding professionalism. Research exploring the exact nature of patient complaints in general practice, especially focused on professionalism, is limited. AIM: To characterise patient complaints in primary care and to explore in more detail which issues with professionalism exist. DESIGN & SETTING: A retrospective observational study in which all unsolicited patient complaints to a representative out-of-hours general practice (OOH GP) service provider in The Netherlands were analysed over a 10-year period (2009–2019). METHOD: Complaints were coded for general characteristics and thematically categorised using the CanMEDS Physician Competency Framework (CanMEDS) as sensitising concepts. Complaints categorised as professionalism were subdivided using open coding. RESULTS: Out of 746 996 patient consultations (telephone, face-to-face, and home visits) 484 (0.065%) resulted in eligible complaint letters. The majority consisted of two or more complaints, resulting in 833 different complaints. Most complaints concerned GPs (80%); a minority (19%) assistants. Thirty-five per cent concerned perceived professionalism lapses of physicians. A rich diversity in the wording of professionalism lapses was found, where ' not being taken seriously ' was mentioned most often. Forty-five per cent related to medical expertise, such as missed diagnoses or unsuccessful clinical treatment. Nineteen per cent related to management problems, especially waiting times and access to care. Communication issues were only explicitly mentioned in 1% of the complaints. CONCLUSION: Most unsolicited patient complaints were related to clinical problems. A third, however, concerned professionalism issues. Not being taken seriously was the most frequent mentioned theme within the professionalism category. Royal College of General Practitioners 2021-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8278513/ /pubmed/33589467 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0168 Text en Copyright © 2021, The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Research Barnhoorn, Pieter C Essers, Geurt TJM Nierkens, Vera Numans, Mattijs E van Mook, Walther NKA Kramer, Anneke WM Patient complaints in general practice seen through the lens of professionalism: a retrospective observational study |
title | Patient complaints in general practice seen through the lens of professionalism: a retrospective observational study |
title_full | Patient complaints in general practice seen through the lens of professionalism: a retrospective observational study |
title_fullStr | Patient complaints in general practice seen through the lens of professionalism: a retrospective observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient complaints in general practice seen through the lens of professionalism: a retrospective observational study |
title_short | Patient complaints in general practice seen through the lens of professionalism: a retrospective observational study |
title_sort | patient complaints in general practice seen through the lens of professionalism: a retrospective observational study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8278513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33589467 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0168 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barnhoornpieterc patientcomplaintsingeneralpracticeseenthroughthelensofprofessionalismaretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT essersgeurttjm patientcomplaintsingeneralpracticeseenthroughthelensofprofessionalismaretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT nierkensvera patientcomplaintsingeneralpracticeseenthroughthelensofprofessionalismaretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT numansmattijse patientcomplaintsingeneralpracticeseenthroughthelensofprofessionalismaretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT vanmookwalthernka patientcomplaintsingeneralpracticeseenthroughthelensofprofessionalismaretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT kramerannekewm patientcomplaintsingeneralpracticeseenthroughthelensofprofessionalismaretrospectiveobservationalstudy |