Cargando…

Patient complaints in general practice seen through the lens of professionalism: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND: Professionalism is a key competence for physicians. Patient complaints provide a unique insight into patient expectations regarding professionalism. Research exploring the exact nature of patient complaints in general practice, especially focused on professionalism, is limited. AIM: To c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnhoorn, Pieter C, Essers, Geurt TJM, Nierkens, Vera, Numans, Mattijs E, van Mook, Walther NKA, Kramer, Anneke WM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8278513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33589467
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0168
_version_ 1783722276605132800
author Barnhoorn, Pieter C
Essers, Geurt TJM
Nierkens, Vera
Numans, Mattijs E
van Mook, Walther NKA
Kramer, Anneke WM
author_facet Barnhoorn, Pieter C
Essers, Geurt TJM
Nierkens, Vera
Numans, Mattijs E
van Mook, Walther NKA
Kramer, Anneke WM
author_sort Barnhoorn, Pieter C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Professionalism is a key competence for physicians. Patient complaints provide a unique insight into patient expectations regarding professionalism. Research exploring the exact nature of patient complaints in general practice, especially focused on professionalism, is limited. AIM: To characterise patient complaints in primary care and to explore in more detail which issues with professionalism exist. DESIGN & SETTING: A retrospective observational study in which all unsolicited patient complaints to a representative out-of-hours general practice (OOH GP) service provider in The Netherlands were analysed over a 10-year period (2009–2019). METHOD: Complaints were coded for general characteristics and thematically categorised using the CanMEDS Physician Competency Framework (CanMEDS) as sensitising concepts. Complaints categorised as professionalism were subdivided using open coding. RESULTS: Out of 746 996 patient consultations (telephone, face-to-face, and home visits) 484 (0.065%) resulted in eligible complaint letters. The majority consisted of two or more complaints, resulting in 833 different complaints. Most complaints concerned GPs (80%); a minority (19%) assistants. Thirty-five per cent concerned perceived professionalism lapses of physicians. A rich diversity in the wording of professionalism lapses was found, where ' not being taken seriously ' was mentioned most often. Forty-five per cent related to medical expertise, such as missed diagnoses or unsuccessful clinical treatment. Nineteen per cent related to management problems, especially waiting times and access to care. Communication issues were only explicitly mentioned in 1% of the complaints. CONCLUSION: Most unsolicited patient complaints were related to clinical problems. A third, however, concerned professionalism issues. Not being taken seriously was the most frequent mentioned theme within the professionalism category.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8278513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82785132021-07-27 Patient complaints in general practice seen through the lens of professionalism: a retrospective observational study Barnhoorn, Pieter C Essers, Geurt TJM Nierkens, Vera Numans, Mattijs E van Mook, Walther NKA Kramer, Anneke WM BJGP Open Research BACKGROUND: Professionalism is a key competence for physicians. Patient complaints provide a unique insight into patient expectations regarding professionalism. Research exploring the exact nature of patient complaints in general practice, especially focused on professionalism, is limited. AIM: To characterise patient complaints in primary care and to explore in more detail which issues with professionalism exist. DESIGN & SETTING: A retrospective observational study in which all unsolicited patient complaints to a representative out-of-hours general practice (OOH GP) service provider in The Netherlands were analysed over a 10-year period (2009–2019). METHOD: Complaints were coded for general characteristics and thematically categorised using the CanMEDS Physician Competency Framework (CanMEDS) as sensitising concepts. Complaints categorised as professionalism were subdivided using open coding. RESULTS: Out of 746 996 patient consultations (telephone, face-to-face, and home visits) 484 (0.065%) resulted in eligible complaint letters. The majority consisted of two or more complaints, resulting in 833 different complaints. Most complaints concerned GPs (80%); a minority (19%) assistants. Thirty-five per cent concerned perceived professionalism lapses of physicians. A rich diversity in the wording of professionalism lapses was found, where ' not being taken seriously ' was mentioned most often. Forty-five per cent related to medical expertise, such as missed diagnoses or unsuccessful clinical treatment. Nineteen per cent related to management problems, especially waiting times and access to care. Communication issues were only explicitly mentioned in 1% of the complaints. CONCLUSION: Most unsolicited patient complaints were related to clinical problems. A third, however, concerned professionalism issues. Not being taken seriously was the most frequent mentioned theme within the professionalism category. Royal College of General Practitioners 2021-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8278513/ /pubmed/33589467 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0168 Text en Copyright © 2021, The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research
Barnhoorn, Pieter C
Essers, Geurt TJM
Nierkens, Vera
Numans, Mattijs E
van Mook, Walther NKA
Kramer, Anneke WM
Patient complaints in general practice seen through the lens of professionalism: a retrospective observational study
title Patient complaints in general practice seen through the lens of professionalism: a retrospective observational study
title_full Patient complaints in general practice seen through the lens of professionalism: a retrospective observational study
title_fullStr Patient complaints in general practice seen through the lens of professionalism: a retrospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Patient complaints in general practice seen through the lens of professionalism: a retrospective observational study
title_short Patient complaints in general practice seen through the lens of professionalism: a retrospective observational study
title_sort patient complaints in general practice seen through the lens of professionalism: a retrospective observational study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8278513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33589467
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0168
work_keys_str_mv AT barnhoornpieterc patientcomplaintsingeneralpracticeseenthroughthelensofprofessionalismaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT essersgeurttjm patientcomplaintsingeneralpracticeseenthroughthelensofprofessionalismaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT nierkensvera patientcomplaintsingeneralpracticeseenthroughthelensofprofessionalismaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT numansmattijse patientcomplaintsingeneralpracticeseenthroughthelensofprofessionalismaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT vanmookwalthernka patientcomplaintsingeneralpracticeseenthroughthelensofprofessionalismaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kramerannekewm patientcomplaintsingeneralpracticeseenthroughthelensofprofessionalismaretrospectiveobservationalstudy