Cargando…

Enhancing task-demands disrupts learning but enhances transfer gains in short-term task-switching training

Content variability was previously suggested to promote stronger learning effects in cognitive training whereas less variability incurred transfer costs (Sabah et al. Psychological Research, 10.1007/s00426-018-1006-7, 2018). Here, we expanded these findings by additionally examining the role of lear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sabah, Katrina, Dolk, Thomas, Meiran, Nachshon, Dreisbach, Gesine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32303843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01335-y
_version_ 1783723818666164224
author Sabah, Katrina
Dolk, Thomas
Meiran, Nachshon
Dreisbach, Gesine
author_facet Sabah, Katrina
Dolk, Thomas
Meiran, Nachshon
Dreisbach, Gesine
author_sort Sabah, Katrina
collection PubMed
description Content variability was previously suggested to promote stronger learning effects in cognitive training whereas less variability incurred transfer costs (Sabah et al. Psychological Research, 10.1007/s00426-018-1006-7, 2018). Here, we expanded these findings by additionally examining the role of learners’ control in short-term task-switching training by comparing voluntary task-switching to a yoked control forced task-switching condition. To this end, four training conditions were compared: (1) forced fixed content, (2) voluntary fixed content, (3) forced varied content, and (3) voluntary varied content. To further enhance task demands, bivalent stimuli were used during training. Participants completed baseline assessment commencing with task-switching and verbal fluency blocks, followed by seven training blocks and last by task-switching (near transfer) and verbal fluency (far transfer) blocks, respectively. For the baseline and transfer task-switching blocks, we used the exact same baseline and first transfer block from Sabah et al. (Psychological Research, 10.1007/s00426-018-1006-7, 2018), employing univalent stimuli and alternating-runs task sequence. Our results pointed again to the contribution of content variability to task-switching performance. No indications for far transfer were observed. Allowing for learners’ control was not found to produce additional transfer gains beyond content variability. A between-study comparison suggests that enhanced task demands, by means of bivalency, promoted higher transfer gains in the current study when compared to Sabah et al. (Psychological Research, 10.1007/s00426-018-1006-7, 2018). Taken together, the current results provide further evidence to the beneficial impact of variability on training outcomes. The lack of modulatory effect for learners’ control is discussed in relation to possible methodological limitations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00426-020-01335-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8286950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82869502021-07-20 Enhancing task-demands disrupts learning but enhances transfer gains in short-term task-switching training Sabah, Katrina Dolk, Thomas Meiran, Nachshon Dreisbach, Gesine Psychol Res Original Article Content variability was previously suggested to promote stronger learning effects in cognitive training whereas less variability incurred transfer costs (Sabah et al. Psychological Research, 10.1007/s00426-018-1006-7, 2018). Here, we expanded these findings by additionally examining the role of learners’ control in short-term task-switching training by comparing voluntary task-switching to a yoked control forced task-switching condition. To this end, four training conditions were compared: (1) forced fixed content, (2) voluntary fixed content, (3) forced varied content, and (3) voluntary varied content. To further enhance task demands, bivalent stimuli were used during training. Participants completed baseline assessment commencing with task-switching and verbal fluency blocks, followed by seven training blocks and last by task-switching (near transfer) and verbal fluency (far transfer) blocks, respectively. For the baseline and transfer task-switching blocks, we used the exact same baseline and first transfer block from Sabah et al. (Psychological Research, 10.1007/s00426-018-1006-7, 2018), employing univalent stimuli and alternating-runs task sequence. Our results pointed again to the contribution of content variability to task-switching performance. No indications for far transfer were observed. Allowing for learners’ control was not found to produce additional transfer gains beyond content variability. A between-study comparison suggests that enhanced task demands, by means of bivalency, promoted higher transfer gains in the current study when compared to Sabah et al. (Psychological Research, 10.1007/s00426-018-1006-7, 2018). Taken together, the current results provide further evidence to the beneficial impact of variability on training outcomes. The lack of modulatory effect for learners’ control is discussed in relation to possible methodological limitations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00426-020-01335-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-04-18 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8286950/ /pubmed/32303843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01335-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Sabah, Katrina
Dolk, Thomas
Meiran, Nachshon
Dreisbach, Gesine
Enhancing task-demands disrupts learning but enhances transfer gains in short-term task-switching training
title Enhancing task-demands disrupts learning but enhances transfer gains in short-term task-switching training
title_full Enhancing task-demands disrupts learning but enhances transfer gains in short-term task-switching training
title_fullStr Enhancing task-demands disrupts learning but enhances transfer gains in short-term task-switching training
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing task-demands disrupts learning but enhances transfer gains in short-term task-switching training
title_short Enhancing task-demands disrupts learning but enhances transfer gains in short-term task-switching training
title_sort enhancing task-demands disrupts learning but enhances transfer gains in short-term task-switching training
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32303843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01335-y
work_keys_str_mv AT sabahkatrina enhancingtaskdemandsdisruptslearningbutenhancestransfergainsinshorttermtaskswitchingtraining
AT dolkthomas enhancingtaskdemandsdisruptslearningbutenhancestransfergainsinshorttermtaskswitchingtraining
AT meirannachshon enhancingtaskdemandsdisruptslearningbutenhancestransfergainsinshorttermtaskswitchingtraining
AT dreisbachgesine enhancingtaskdemandsdisruptslearningbutenhancestransfergainsinshorttermtaskswitchingtraining