Cargando…
An artificial neural network−pharmacokinetic model and its interpretation using Shapley additive explanations
We developed a method to apply artificial neural networks (ANNs) for predicting time‐series pharmacokinetics (PKs), and an interpretable the ANN‐PK model, which can explain the evidence of prediction by applying Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). A previous population PK (PopPK) model of cyclospo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8302242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33955705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12643 |
_version_ | 1783726847902613504 |
---|---|
author | Ogami, Chika Tsuji, Yasuhiro Seki, Hiroto Kawano, Hideaki To, Hideto Matsumoto, Yoshiaki Hosono, Hiroyuki |
author_facet | Ogami, Chika Tsuji, Yasuhiro Seki, Hiroto Kawano, Hideaki To, Hideto Matsumoto, Yoshiaki Hosono, Hiroyuki |
author_sort | Ogami, Chika |
collection | PubMed |
description | We developed a method to apply artificial neural networks (ANNs) for predicting time‐series pharmacokinetics (PKs), and an interpretable the ANN‐PK model, which can explain the evidence of prediction by applying Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). A previous population PK (PopPK) model of cyclosporin A was used as the comparison model. The patients’ data were used for the ANN‐PK model input, and the output by ANN was the clearance (CL). The estimated CL value from the ANN were substituted into the one‐compartment with one‐order absorption model, the concentrations were calculated, and the parameters of ANN were updated by the back‐propagation method. Kernel SHAP was applied to the trained model and the SHAP value of each input was calculated. The root mean squared error for the PopPK model and the ANN‐PK model were 41.1 and 31.0 ng/ml, respectively. The goodness of fit plots for the ANN‐PK model represented more convergence to y = x compared with that for the PopPK model, with good model performance for the ANN‐PK model. The most influential factors on CL output were age and body weight from the evaluation using Kernel SHAP, and these factors were incorporated into the PopPK model as the significant covariates of CL. The ANN‐PK model could handle time‐series data and showed higher prediction accuracy then the conventional PopPK model, and the scientific validity for the model could be evaluated by applying SHAP. STUDY HIGHLIGHTS: WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC? WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS? WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE? HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE DRUG DISCOVERY, DEVELOPMENT, AND/OR THERAPEUTICS? We expect that our study will contribute to develop the interpretable ANN model, which can predict the time‐series PKs, drug efficacies, and side effects with high prediction performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8302242 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83022422021-07-28 An artificial neural network−pharmacokinetic model and its interpretation using Shapley additive explanations Ogami, Chika Tsuji, Yasuhiro Seki, Hiroto Kawano, Hideaki To, Hideto Matsumoto, Yoshiaki Hosono, Hiroyuki CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Research We developed a method to apply artificial neural networks (ANNs) for predicting time‐series pharmacokinetics (PKs), and an interpretable the ANN‐PK model, which can explain the evidence of prediction by applying Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). A previous population PK (PopPK) model of cyclosporin A was used as the comparison model. The patients’ data were used for the ANN‐PK model input, and the output by ANN was the clearance (CL). The estimated CL value from the ANN were substituted into the one‐compartment with one‐order absorption model, the concentrations were calculated, and the parameters of ANN were updated by the back‐propagation method. Kernel SHAP was applied to the trained model and the SHAP value of each input was calculated. The root mean squared error for the PopPK model and the ANN‐PK model were 41.1 and 31.0 ng/ml, respectively. The goodness of fit plots for the ANN‐PK model represented more convergence to y = x compared with that for the PopPK model, with good model performance for the ANN‐PK model. The most influential factors on CL output were age and body weight from the evaluation using Kernel SHAP, and these factors were incorporated into the PopPK model as the significant covariates of CL. The ANN‐PK model could handle time‐series data and showed higher prediction accuracy then the conventional PopPK model, and the scientific validity for the model could be evaluated by applying SHAP. STUDY HIGHLIGHTS: WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC? WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS? WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE? HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE DRUG DISCOVERY, DEVELOPMENT, AND/OR THERAPEUTICS? We expect that our study will contribute to develop the interpretable ANN model, which can predict the time‐series PKs, drug efficacies, and side effects with high prediction performance. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-27 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8302242/ /pubmed/33955705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12643 Text en © 2021 The Authors. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Ogami, Chika Tsuji, Yasuhiro Seki, Hiroto Kawano, Hideaki To, Hideto Matsumoto, Yoshiaki Hosono, Hiroyuki An artificial neural network−pharmacokinetic model and its interpretation using Shapley additive explanations |
title | An artificial neural network−pharmacokinetic model and its interpretation using Shapley additive explanations |
title_full | An artificial neural network−pharmacokinetic model and its interpretation using Shapley additive explanations |
title_fullStr | An artificial neural network−pharmacokinetic model and its interpretation using Shapley additive explanations |
title_full_unstemmed | An artificial neural network−pharmacokinetic model and its interpretation using Shapley additive explanations |
title_short | An artificial neural network−pharmacokinetic model and its interpretation using Shapley additive explanations |
title_sort | artificial neural network−pharmacokinetic model and its interpretation using shapley additive explanations |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8302242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33955705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12643 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ogamichika anartificialneuralnetworkpharmacokineticmodelanditsinterpretationusingshapleyadditiveexplanations AT tsujiyasuhiro anartificialneuralnetworkpharmacokineticmodelanditsinterpretationusingshapleyadditiveexplanations AT sekihiroto anartificialneuralnetworkpharmacokineticmodelanditsinterpretationusingshapleyadditiveexplanations AT kawanohideaki anartificialneuralnetworkpharmacokineticmodelanditsinterpretationusingshapleyadditiveexplanations AT tohideto anartificialneuralnetworkpharmacokineticmodelanditsinterpretationusingshapleyadditiveexplanations AT matsumotoyoshiaki anartificialneuralnetworkpharmacokineticmodelanditsinterpretationusingshapleyadditiveexplanations AT hosonohiroyuki anartificialneuralnetworkpharmacokineticmodelanditsinterpretationusingshapleyadditiveexplanations AT ogamichika artificialneuralnetworkpharmacokineticmodelanditsinterpretationusingshapleyadditiveexplanations AT tsujiyasuhiro artificialneuralnetworkpharmacokineticmodelanditsinterpretationusingshapleyadditiveexplanations AT sekihiroto artificialneuralnetworkpharmacokineticmodelanditsinterpretationusingshapleyadditiveexplanations AT kawanohideaki artificialneuralnetworkpharmacokineticmodelanditsinterpretationusingshapleyadditiveexplanations AT tohideto artificialneuralnetworkpharmacokineticmodelanditsinterpretationusingshapleyadditiveexplanations AT matsumotoyoshiaki artificialneuralnetworkpharmacokineticmodelanditsinterpretationusingshapleyadditiveexplanations AT hosonohiroyuki artificialneuralnetworkpharmacokineticmodelanditsinterpretationusingshapleyadditiveexplanations |