Cargando…

A Review of Dietary Intake of Acrylamide in Humans

The dietary intake of acrylamide (AA) is a health concern, and food is being monitored worldwide, but the extent of AA exposure from the diet is uncertain. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of estimated dietary intake. We performed a PubMed search identifying studies that used dietar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Timmermann, Clara Amalie Gade, Mølck, Signe Sonne, Kadawathagedara, Manik, Bjerregaard, Anne Ahrendt, Törnqvist, Margareta, Brantsæter, Anne Lise, Pedersen, Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8309717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209352
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics9070155
_version_ 1783728586788700160
author Timmermann, Clara Amalie Gade
Mølck, Signe Sonne
Kadawathagedara, Manik
Bjerregaard, Anne Ahrendt
Törnqvist, Margareta
Brantsæter, Anne Lise
Pedersen, Marie
author_facet Timmermann, Clara Amalie Gade
Mølck, Signe Sonne
Kadawathagedara, Manik
Bjerregaard, Anne Ahrendt
Törnqvist, Margareta
Brantsæter, Anne Lise
Pedersen, Marie
author_sort Timmermann, Clara Amalie Gade
collection PubMed
description The dietary intake of acrylamide (AA) is a health concern, and food is being monitored worldwide, but the extent of AA exposure from the diet is uncertain. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of estimated dietary intake. We performed a PubMed search identifying studies that used dietary questionnaires and recalls to estimate total dietary AA intake. A total of 101 studies were included, corresponding to 68 original study populations from 26 countries. Questionnaires were used in 57 studies, dietary recalls were used in 33 studies, and 11 studies used both methods. The estimated median AA intake ranged from 0.02 to 1.53 μg/kg body weight/day between studies. Children were represented in 25 studies, and the body-weight-adjusted estimated AA intake was up to three times higher for children than adults. The majority of studies were from Europe (n = 65), Asia (n = 17), and the USA (n = 12). Studies from Asia generally estimated lower intakes than studies from Europe and the USA. Differences in methods undermine direct comparison across studies. The assessment of AA intake through dietary questionnaires and recalls has limitations. The integration of these methods with the analysis of validated biomarkers of exposure/internal dose would improve the accuracy of dietary AA intake exposure estimation. This overview shows that AA exposure is widespread and the large variation across and within populations shows a potential for reduced intake among those with the highest exposure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8309717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83097172021-07-25 A Review of Dietary Intake of Acrylamide in Humans Timmermann, Clara Amalie Gade Mølck, Signe Sonne Kadawathagedara, Manik Bjerregaard, Anne Ahrendt Törnqvist, Margareta Brantsæter, Anne Lise Pedersen, Marie Toxics Review The dietary intake of acrylamide (AA) is a health concern, and food is being monitored worldwide, but the extent of AA exposure from the diet is uncertain. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of estimated dietary intake. We performed a PubMed search identifying studies that used dietary questionnaires and recalls to estimate total dietary AA intake. A total of 101 studies were included, corresponding to 68 original study populations from 26 countries. Questionnaires were used in 57 studies, dietary recalls were used in 33 studies, and 11 studies used both methods. The estimated median AA intake ranged from 0.02 to 1.53 μg/kg body weight/day between studies. Children were represented in 25 studies, and the body-weight-adjusted estimated AA intake was up to three times higher for children than adults. The majority of studies were from Europe (n = 65), Asia (n = 17), and the USA (n = 12). Studies from Asia generally estimated lower intakes than studies from Europe and the USA. Differences in methods undermine direct comparison across studies. The assessment of AA intake through dietary questionnaires and recalls has limitations. The integration of these methods with the analysis of validated biomarkers of exposure/internal dose would improve the accuracy of dietary AA intake exposure estimation. This overview shows that AA exposure is widespread and the large variation across and within populations shows a potential for reduced intake among those with the highest exposure. MDPI 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8309717/ /pubmed/34209352 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics9070155 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Timmermann, Clara Amalie Gade
Mølck, Signe Sonne
Kadawathagedara, Manik
Bjerregaard, Anne Ahrendt
Törnqvist, Margareta
Brantsæter, Anne Lise
Pedersen, Marie
A Review of Dietary Intake of Acrylamide in Humans
title A Review of Dietary Intake of Acrylamide in Humans
title_full A Review of Dietary Intake of Acrylamide in Humans
title_fullStr A Review of Dietary Intake of Acrylamide in Humans
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Dietary Intake of Acrylamide in Humans
title_short A Review of Dietary Intake of Acrylamide in Humans
title_sort review of dietary intake of acrylamide in humans
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8309717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209352
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics9070155
work_keys_str_mv AT timmermannclaraamaliegade areviewofdietaryintakeofacrylamideinhumans
AT mølcksignesonne areviewofdietaryintakeofacrylamideinhumans
AT kadawathagedaramanik areviewofdietaryintakeofacrylamideinhumans
AT bjerregaardanneahrendt areviewofdietaryintakeofacrylamideinhumans
AT tornqvistmargareta areviewofdietaryintakeofacrylamideinhumans
AT brantsæterannelise areviewofdietaryintakeofacrylamideinhumans
AT pedersenmarie areviewofdietaryintakeofacrylamideinhumans
AT timmermannclaraamaliegade reviewofdietaryintakeofacrylamideinhumans
AT mølcksignesonne reviewofdietaryintakeofacrylamideinhumans
AT kadawathagedaramanik reviewofdietaryintakeofacrylamideinhumans
AT bjerregaardanneahrendt reviewofdietaryintakeofacrylamideinhumans
AT tornqvistmargareta reviewofdietaryintakeofacrylamideinhumans
AT brantsæterannelise reviewofdietaryintakeofacrylamideinhumans
AT pedersenmarie reviewofdietaryintakeofacrylamideinhumans