Cargando…

Direct Comparison of the Lowest Effect Concentrations of Mutagenic Reference Substances in Two Ames Test Formats

The Ames assay is the standard assay for identifying DNA-reactive genotoxic substances. Multiple formats are available and the correct choice of an assay protocol is essential for achieving optimal performance, including fit for purpose detection limits and required screening capacity. In the presen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rainer, Bernhard, Pinter, Elisabeth, Prielinger, Lukas, Coppola, Chiara, Marin-Kuan, Maricel, Schilter, Benoit, Apprich, Silvia, Tacker, Manfred
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8309791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics9070152
_version_ 1783728605740662784
author Rainer, Bernhard
Pinter, Elisabeth
Prielinger, Lukas
Coppola, Chiara
Marin-Kuan, Maricel
Schilter, Benoit
Apprich, Silvia
Tacker, Manfred
author_facet Rainer, Bernhard
Pinter, Elisabeth
Prielinger, Lukas
Coppola, Chiara
Marin-Kuan, Maricel
Schilter, Benoit
Apprich, Silvia
Tacker, Manfred
author_sort Rainer, Bernhard
collection PubMed
description The Ames assay is the standard assay for identifying DNA-reactive genotoxic substances. Multiple formats are available and the correct choice of an assay protocol is essential for achieving optimal performance, including fit for purpose detection limits and required screening capacity. In the present study, a comparison of those parameters between two commonly used formats, the standard pre-incubation Ames test and the liquid-based Ames MPF™, was performed. For that purpose, twenty-one substances with various modes of action were chosen and tested for their lowest effect concentrations (LEC) with both tests. In addition, two sources of rat liver homogenate S9 fraction, Aroclor 1254-induced and phenobarbital/β-naphthoflavone induced, were compared in the Ames MPF™. Overall, the standard pre-incubation Ames and the Ames MPF™ assay showed high concordance (>90%) for mutagenic vs. non-mutagenic compound classification. The LEC values of the Ames MPF™ format were lower for 17 of the 21 of the selected test substances. The S9 source had no impact on the test results. This leads to the conclusion that the liquid-based Ames MPF™ assay format provides screening advantages when low concentrations are relevant, such as in the testing of complex mixtures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8309791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83097912021-07-25 Direct Comparison of the Lowest Effect Concentrations of Mutagenic Reference Substances in Two Ames Test Formats Rainer, Bernhard Pinter, Elisabeth Prielinger, Lukas Coppola, Chiara Marin-Kuan, Maricel Schilter, Benoit Apprich, Silvia Tacker, Manfred Toxics Article The Ames assay is the standard assay for identifying DNA-reactive genotoxic substances. Multiple formats are available and the correct choice of an assay protocol is essential for achieving optimal performance, including fit for purpose detection limits and required screening capacity. In the present study, a comparison of those parameters between two commonly used formats, the standard pre-incubation Ames test and the liquid-based Ames MPF™, was performed. For that purpose, twenty-one substances with various modes of action were chosen and tested for their lowest effect concentrations (LEC) with both tests. In addition, two sources of rat liver homogenate S9 fraction, Aroclor 1254-induced and phenobarbital/β-naphthoflavone induced, were compared in the Ames MPF™. Overall, the standard pre-incubation Ames and the Ames MPF™ assay showed high concordance (>90%) for mutagenic vs. non-mutagenic compound classification. The LEC values of the Ames MPF™ format were lower for 17 of the 21 of the selected test substances. The S9 source had no impact on the test results. This leads to the conclusion that the liquid-based Ames MPF™ assay format provides screening advantages when low concentrations are relevant, such as in the testing of complex mixtures. MDPI 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8309791/ /pubmed/34209992 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics9070152 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rainer, Bernhard
Pinter, Elisabeth
Prielinger, Lukas
Coppola, Chiara
Marin-Kuan, Maricel
Schilter, Benoit
Apprich, Silvia
Tacker, Manfred
Direct Comparison of the Lowest Effect Concentrations of Mutagenic Reference Substances in Two Ames Test Formats
title Direct Comparison of the Lowest Effect Concentrations of Mutagenic Reference Substances in Two Ames Test Formats
title_full Direct Comparison of the Lowest Effect Concentrations of Mutagenic Reference Substances in Two Ames Test Formats
title_fullStr Direct Comparison of the Lowest Effect Concentrations of Mutagenic Reference Substances in Two Ames Test Formats
title_full_unstemmed Direct Comparison of the Lowest Effect Concentrations of Mutagenic Reference Substances in Two Ames Test Formats
title_short Direct Comparison of the Lowest Effect Concentrations of Mutagenic Reference Substances in Two Ames Test Formats
title_sort direct comparison of the lowest effect concentrations of mutagenic reference substances in two ames test formats
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8309791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics9070152
work_keys_str_mv AT rainerbernhard directcomparisonofthelowesteffectconcentrationsofmutagenicreferencesubstancesintwoamestestformats
AT pinterelisabeth directcomparisonofthelowesteffectconcentrationsofmutagenicreferencesubstancesintwoamestestformats
AT prielingerlukas directcomparisonofthelowesteffectconcentrationsofmutagenicreferencesubstancesintwoamestestformats
AT coppolachiara directcomparisonofthelowesteffectconcentrationsofmutagenicreferencesubstancesintwoamestestformats
AT marinkuanmaricel directcomparisonofthelowesteffectconcentrationsofmutagenicreferencesubstancesintwoamestestformats
AT schilterbenoit directcomparisonofthelowesteffectconcentrationsofmutagenicreferencesubstancesintwoamestestformats
AT apprichsilvia directcomparisonofthelowesteffectconcentrationsofmutagenicreferencesubstancesintwoamestestformats
AT tackermanfred directcomparisonofthelowesteffectconcentrationsofmutagenicreferencesubstancesintwoamestestformats