Cargando…
Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
BACKGROUND: The in-hospital mortality of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) increases to more than 50% following a cardiogenic shock (CS) event. This study highlights the need to consider the risk of delayed calculation in developing in-hospital CS risk models. This rep...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8350690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34430603 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-2905 |
_version_ | 1783735823361900544 |
---|---|
author | Bai, Zhixun Hu, Shan Wang, Yan Deng, Wenwen Gu, Ning Zhao, Ranzun Zhang, Wei Ma, Yi Wang, Zhenglong Liu, Zhijiang Shen, Changyin Shi, Bei |
author_facet | Bai, Zhixun Hu, Shan Wang, Yan Deng, Wenwen Gu, Ning Zhao, Ranzun Zhang, Wei Ma, Yi Wang, Zhenglong Liu, Zhijiang Shen, Changyin Shi, Bei |
author_sort | Bai, Zhixun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The in-hospital mortality of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) increases to more than 50% following a cardiogenic shock (CS) event. This study highlights the need to consider the risk of delayed calculation in developing in-hospital CS risk models. This report compared the performances of multiple machine learning models and established a late-CS risk nomogram for STEMI patients. METHODS: This study used logistic regression (LR) models, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), support vector regression (SVM), and tree-based ensemble machine learning models [light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)] to predict CS risk in STEMI patients. The models were developed based on 1,598 and 684 STEMI patients in the training and test datasets, respectively. The models were compared based on accuracy, the area under the curve (AUC), recall, precision, and Gini score, and the optimal model was used to develop a late CS risk nomogram. Discrimination, calibration, and the clinical usefulness of the predictive model were assessed using C-index, calibration plotd, and decision curve analyses. RESULTS: A total of 2282 STEMI patients recruited between January 1, 2016 and May 31, 2020, were included in the complete dataset. The linear models built using LASSO and LR showed the highest overall predictive power, with an average accuracy over 0.93 and an AUC above 0.82. With a C-index of 0.811 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.769–0.853], the LASSO nomogram showed good differentiation and proper calibration. In internal validation tests, a high C-index value of 0.821 was achieved. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve (CIC) examination showed that compared with the previous score-based models, the LASSO model showed superior clinical relevance. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, five machine learning methods were developed for in-hospital CS prediction. The LASSO model showed the best predictive performance. This nomogram could provide an accurate prognostic prediction for CS risk in patients with STEMI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8350690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83506902021-08-23 Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction Bai, Zhixun Hu, Shan Wang, Yan Deng, Wenwen Gu, Ning Zhao, Ranzun Zhang, Wei Ma, Yi Wang, Zhenglong Liu, Zhijiang Shen, Changyin Shi, Bei Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The in-hospital mortality of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) increases to more than 50% following a cardiogenic shock (CS) event. This study highlights the need to consider the risk of delayed calculation in developing in-hospital CS risk models. This report compared the performances of multiple machine learning models and established a late-CS risk nomogram for STEMI patients. METHODS: This study used logistic regression (LR) models, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), support vector regression (SVM), and tree-based ensemble machine learning models [light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)] to predict CS risk in STEMI patients. The models were developed based on 1,598 and 684 STEMI patients in the training and test datasets, respectively. The models were compared based on accuracy, the area under the curve (AUC), recall, precision, and Gini score, and the optimal model was used to develop a late CS risk nomogram. Discrimination, calibration, and the clinical usefulness of the predictive model were assessed using C-index, calibration plotd, and decision curve analyses. RESULTS: A total of 2282 STEMI patients recruited between January 1, 2016 and May 31, 2020, were included in the complete dataset. The linear models built using LASSO and LR showed the highest overall predictive power, with an average accuracy over 0.93 and an AUC above 0.82. With a C-index of 0.811 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.769–0.853], the LASSO nomogram showed good differentiation and proper calibration. In internal validation tests, a high C-index value of 0.821 was achieved. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve (CIC) examination showed that compared with the previous score-based models, the LASSO model showed superior clinical relevance. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, five machine learning methods were developed for in-hospital CS prediction. The LASSO model showed the best predictive performance. This nomogram could provide an accurate prognostic prediction for CS risk in patients with STEMI. AME Publishing Company 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8350690/ /pubmed/34430603 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-2905 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bai, Zhixun Hu, Shan Wang, Yan Deng, Wenwen Gu, Ning Zhao, Ranzun Zhang, Wei Ma, Yi Wang, Zhenglong Liu, Zhijiang Shen, Changyin Shi, Bei Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction |
title | Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction |
title_full | Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction |
title_fullStr | Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction |
title_short | Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction |
title_sort | development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with st-segment elevation myocardial infarction |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8350690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34430603 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-2905 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baizhixun developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT hushan developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT wangyan developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT dengwenwen developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT guning developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT zhaoranzun developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT zhangwei developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT mayi developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT wangzhenglong developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT liuzhijiang developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT shenchangyin developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT shibei developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction |