Cargando…

Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: The in-hospital mortality of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) increases to more than 50% following a cardiogenic shock (CS) event. This study highlights the need to consider the risk of delayed calculation in developing in-hospital CS risk models. This rep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bai, Zhixun, Hu, Shan, Wang, Yan, Deng, Wenwen, Gu, Ning, Zhao, Ranzun, Zhang, Wei, Ma, Yi, Wang, Zhenglong, Liu, Zhijiang, Shen, Changyin, Shi, Bei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8350690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34430603
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-2905
_version_ 1783735823361900544
author Bai, Zhixun
Hu, Shan
Wang, Yan
Deng, Wenwen
Gu, Ning
Zhao, Ranzun
Zhang, Wei
Ma, Yi
Wang, Zhenglong
Liu, Zhijiang
Shen, Changyin
Shi, Bei
author_facet Bai, Zhixun
Hu, Shan
Wang, Yan
Deng, Wenwen
Gu, Ning
Zhao, Ranzun
Zhang, Wei
Ma, Yi
Wang, Zhenglong
Liu, Zhijiang
Shen, Changyin
Shi, Bei
author_sort Bai, Zhixun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The in-hospital mortality of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) increases to more than 50% following a cardiogenic shock (CS) event. This study highlights the need to consider the risk of delayed calculation in developing in-hospital CS risk models. This report compared the performances of multiple machine learning models and established a late-CS risk nomogram for STEMI patients. METHODS: This study used logistic regression (LR) models, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), support vector regression (SVM), and tree-based ensemble machine learning models [light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)] to predict CS risk in STEMI patients. The models were developed based on 1,598 and 684 STEMI patients in the training and test datasets, respectively. The models were compared based on accuracy, the area under the curve (AUC), recall, precision, and Gini score, and the optimal model was used to develop a late CS risk nomogram. Discrimination, calibration, and the clinical usefulness of the predictive model were assessed using C-index, calibration plotd, and decision curve analyses. RESULTS: A total of 2282 STEMI patients recruited between January 1, 2016 and May 31, 2020, were included in the complete dataset. The linear models built using LASSO and LR showed the highest overall predictive power, with an average accuracy over 0.93 and an AUC above 0.82. With a C-index of 0.811 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.769–0.853], the LASSO nomogram showed good differentiation and proper calibration. In internal validation tests, a high C-index value of 0.821 was achieved. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve (CIC) examination showed that compared with the previous score-based models, the LASSO model showed superior clinical relevance. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, five machine learning methods were developed for in-hospital CS prediction. The LASSO model showed the best predictive performance. This nomogram could provide an accurate prognostic prediction for CS risk in patients with STEMI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8350690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83506902021-08-23 Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction Bai, Zhixun Hu, Shan Wang, Yan Deng, Wenwen Gu, Ning Zhao, Ranzun Zhang, Wei Ma, Yi Wang, Zhenglong Liu, Zhijiang Shen, Changyin Shi, Bei Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The in-hospital mortality of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) increases to more than 50% following a cardiogenic shock (CS) event. This study highlights the need to consider the risk of delayed calculation in developing in-hospital CS risk models. This report compared the performances of multiple machine learning models and established a late-CS risk nomogram for STEMI patients. METHODS: This study used logistic regression (LR) models, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), support vector regression (SVM), and tree-based ensemble machine learning models [light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)] to predict CS risk in STEMI patients. The models were developed based on 1,598 and 684 STEMI patients in the training and test datasets, respectively. The models were compared based on accuracy, the area under the curve (AUC), recall, precision, and Gini score, and the optimal model was used to develop a late CS risk nomogram. Discrimination, calibration, and the clinical usefulness of the predictive model were assessed using C-index, calibration plotd, and decision curve analyses. RESULTS: A total of 2282 STEMI patients recruited between January 1, 2016 and May 31, 2020, were included in the complete dataset. The linear models built using LASSO and LR showed the highest overall predictive power, with an average accuracy over 0.93 and an AUC above 0.82. With a C-index of 0.811 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.769–0.853], the LASSO nomogram showed good differentiation and proper calibration. In internal validation tests, a high C-index value of 0.821 was achieved. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve (CIC) examination showed that compared with the previous score-based models, the LASSO model showed superior clinical relevance. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, five machine learning methods were developed for in-hospital CS prediction. The LASSO model showed the best predictive performance. This nomogram could provide an accurate prognostic prediction for CS risk in patients with STEMI. AME Publishing Company 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8350690/ /pubmed/34430603 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-2905 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Bai, Zhixun
Hu, Shan
Wang, Yan
Deng, Wenwen
Gu, Ning
Zhao, Ranzun
Zhang, Wei
Ma, Yi
Wang, Zhenglong
Liu, Zhijiang
Shen, Changyin
Shi, Bei
Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
title Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
title_full Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
title_fullStr Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
title_full_unstemmed Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
title_short Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
title_sort development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with st-segment elevation myocardial infarction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8350690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34430603
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-2905
work_keys_str_mv AT baizhixun developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT hushan developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT wangyan developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT dengwenwen developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT guning developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT zhaoranzun developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT zhangwei developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT mayi developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT wangzhenglong developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT liuzhijiang developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT shenchangyin developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT shibei developmentofamachinelearningmodeltopredicttheriskoflatecardiogenicshockinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction