Cargando…

LMD-18. Detection and serial monitoring of CSF ctDNA in breast cancer leptomeningeal disease (BCLM)

BACKGROUND: CSF cytology is the gold standard diagnostic test for BCLM, but is hampered by a low sensitivity, often necessitating repeated lumbar puncture to confirm or refute the diagnosis. Furthermore, during the treatment of BCLM, there is no robust quantitative response tool to guide treatment d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fitzpatrick, Amanda, Iravani, Marjan, Okines, Alicia, Mills, Adam, Harries, Mark, Tutt, Andrew, Isacke, Clare
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351201/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab071.043
_version_ 1783735922591793152
author Fitzpatrick, Amanda
Iravani, Marjan
Okines, Alicia
Mills, Adam
Harries, Mark
Tutt, Andrew
Isacke, Clare
author_facet Fitzpatrick, Amanda
Iravani, Marjan
Okines, Alicia
Mills, Adam
Harries, Mark
Tutt, Andrew
Isacke, Clare
author_sort Fitzpatrick, Amanda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: CSF cytology is the gold standard diagnostic test for BCLM, but is hampered by a low sensitivity, often necessitating repeated lumbar puncture to confirm or refute the diagnosis. Furthermore, during the treatment of BCLM, there is no robust quantitative response tool to guide treatment decisions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: cfDNA was obtained from CSF and plasma in patients with breast cancer undergoing investigation for BCLM (n = 28) and during subsequent intrathecal treatment (n = 13). Ultra low pass whole genome sequencing (ulpWGS) and estimation of the ctDNA fraction was performed. Results were validated by mutation-specific digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). RESULTS: 22/28 cases had confirmed BCLM by positive MRI and/or CSF cytology. The remaining 6/28 had suspected but non-confirmed BCLM, and at median 20 months follow up, these patients were BCLM-free. CSF ctDNA fraction was significantly elevated (median 57.5, IQR 38.3 - 84.9%) in confirmed BCLM compared to 6 non-confirmed BCLM (median 5.0, IQR 0.0 - 6.7%) (p <0.0001). ctDNA fraction was detected in BCLM confirmed cases regardless of negative cytology or MRI. Plasma ctDNA fraction was only detected in extra-cranial disease progression. ctDNA fraction was concordant with mutant allele fraction measured by ddPCR (n = 118 samples). Serial CSF ctDNA fraction during intrathecal treatment showed dynamic changes, while CSF cytology and MRI were often unchanged or equivocal. Early reduction in CSF ctDNA fraction was associated with longer responses to intrathecal therapy. Further, rising ctDNA fraction during intrathecal chemotherapy could be detected up to 6 weeks before relapse in neurological symptoms, cytology or MRI. CONCLUSION: Measuring CSF ctDNA fraction is a sensitive diagnostic test for BCLM and could lead to more timely and accurate diagnosis. During intrathecal chemotherapy, CSF ctDNA also provides a quantitative response biomarker to help guide clinical management in this difficult treatment scenario.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8351201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83512012021-08-09 LMD-18. Detection and serial monitoring of CSF ctDNA in breast cancer leptomeningeal disease (BCLM) Fitzpatrick, Amanda Iravani, Marjan Okines, Alicia Mills, Adam Harries, Mark Tutt, Andrew Isacke, Clare Neurooncol Adv Supplement Abstracts BACKGROUND: CSF cytology is the gold standard diagnostic test for BCLM, but is hampered by a low sensitivity, often necessitating repeated lumbar puncture to confirm or refute the diagnosis. Furthermore, during the treatment of BCLM, there is no robust quantitative response tool to guide treatment decisions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: cfDNA was obtained from CSF and plasma in patients with breast cancer undergoing investigation for BCLM (n = 28) and during subsequent intrathecal treatment (n = 13). Ultra low pass whole genome sequencing (ulpWGS) and estimation of the ctDNA fraction was performed. Results were validated by mutation-specific digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). RESULTS: 22/28 cases had confirmed BCLM by positive MRI and/or CSF cytology. The remaining 6/28 had suspected but non-confirmed BCLM, and at median 20 months follow up, these patients were BCLM-free. CSF ctDNA fraction was significantly elevated (median 57.5, IQR 38.3 - 84.9%) in confirmed BCLM compared to 6 non-confirmed BCLM (median 5.0, IQR 0.0 - 6.7%) (p <0.0001). ctDNA fraction was detected in BCLM confirmed cases regardless of negative cytology or MRI. Plasma ctDNA fraction was only detected in extra-cranial disease progression. ctDNA fraction was concordant with mutant allele fraction measured by ddPCR (n = 118 samples). Serial CSF ctDNA fraction during intrathecal treatment showed dynamic changes, while CSF cytology and MRI were often unchanged or equivocal. Early reduction in CSF ctDNA fraction was associated with longer responses to intrathecal therapy. Further, rising ctDNA fraction during intrathecal chemotherapy could be detected up to 6 weeks before relapse in neurological symptoms, cytology or MRI. CONCLUSION: Measuring CSF ctDNA fraction is a sensitive diagnostic test for BCLM and could lead to more timely and accurate diagnosis. During intrathecal chemotherapy, CSF ctDNA also provides a quantitative response biomarker to help guide clinical management in this difficult treatment scenario. Oxford University Press 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8351201/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab071.043 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Supplement Abstracts
Fitzpatrick, Amanda
Iravani, Marjan
Okines, Alicia
Mills, Adam
Harries, Mark
Tutt, Andrew
Isacke, Clare
LMD-18. Detection and serial monitoring of CSF ctDNA in breast cancer leptomeningeal disease (BCLM)
title LMD-18. Detection and serial monitoring of CSF ctDNA in breast cancer leptomeningeal disease (BCLM)
title_full LMD-18. Detection and serial monitoring of CSF ctDNA in breast cancer leptomeningeal disease (BCLM)
title_fullStr LMD-18. Detection and serial monitoring of CSF ctDNA in breast cancer leptomeningeal disease (BCLM)
title_full_unstemmed LMD-18. Detection and serial monitoring of CSF ctDNA in breast cancer leptomeningeal disease (BCLM)
title_short LMD-18. Detection and serial monitoring of CSF ctDNA in breast cancer leptomeningeal disease (BCLM)
title_sort lmd-18. detection and serial monitoring of csf ctdna in breast cancer leptomeningeal disease (bclm)
topic Supplement Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351201/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab071.043
work_keys_str_mv AT fitzpatrickamanda lmd18detectionandserialmonitoringofcsfctdnainbreastcancerleptomeningealdiseasebclm
AT iravanimarjan lmd18detectionandserialmonitoringofcsfctdnainbreastcancerleptomeningealdiseasebclm
AT okinesalicia lmd18detectionandserialmonitoringofcsfctdnainbreastcancerleptomeningealdiseasebclm
AT millsadam lmd18detectionandserialmonitoringofcsfctdnainbreastcancerleptomeningealdiseasebclm
AT harriesmark lmd18detectionandserialmonitoringofcsfctdnainbreastcancerleptomeningealdiseasebclm
AT tuttandrew lmd18detectionandserialmonitoringofcsfctdnainbreastcancerleptomeningealdiseasebclm
AT isackeclare lmd18detectionandserialmonitoringofcsfctdnainbreastcancerleptomeningealdiseasebclm