Cargando…

Aspects and Challenges of Resource Use Measurement in Health Economics: Towards a Comprehensive Measurement Framework

BACKGROUND: While the methods for conducting health economics research in general are improving, current guidelines provide limited guidance regarding resource use measurement (RUM). Consequently, a variety of methods exists, yet there is no overview of aspects to consider when deciding on the most...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janssen, Luca M. M., Drost, Ruben M. W. A., Paulus, Aggie T. G., Garfield, Kirsty, Hollingworth, William, Noble, Sian, Thorn, Joanna C., Pokhilenko, Irina, Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34169466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-021-01048-z
_version_ 1783736268232851456
author Janssen, Luca M. M.
Drost, Ruben M. W. A.
Paulus, Aggie T. G.
Garfield, Kirsty
Hollingworth, William
Noble, Sian
Thorn, Joanna C.
Pokhilenko, Irina
Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
author_facet Janssen, Luca M. M.
Drost, Ruben M. W. A.
Paulus, Aggie T. G.
Garfield, Kirsty
Hollingworth, William
Noble, Sian
Thorn, Joanna C.
Pokhilenko, Irina
Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
author_sort Janssen, Luca M. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While the methods for conducting health economics research in general are improving, current guidelines provide limited guidance regarding resource use measurement (RUM). Consequently, a variety of methods exists, yet there is no overview of aspects to consider when deciding on the most appropriate RUM methodology. Therefore, this study aims to (1) identify and categorize existing knowledge regarding aspects of RUM, and (2) develop a framework that provides a comprehensive overview of methodological aspects regarding RUM. METHODS: Relevant articles were identified by enrolling a search string in six databases and handsearching the DIRUM database. Included articles were descriptively reviewed and served as input for a comprehensive framework. Health economics experts were involved during the process to establish the framework’s face validity. RESULTS: Forty articles were included in the scoping review. The RUM framework consists of four methodological RUM domains: ‘Whom to measure’, addressing whom to ask and whom to measure; ‘How to measure’, addressing the different approaches of measurement; ‘How often to measure’, addressing recall period and measurement patterns; and ‘Additional considerations’, which covers additional aspects that are essential for further refining the methodologies for measurement. Evidence retrieved from the scoping review was categorized according to these domains. CONCLUSION: This study clustered the aspects of RUM methodology in health economics into a comprehensive framework. The results may guide health economists in their decision making regarding the selection of appropriate RUM methods and developing instruments for RUM. Furthermore, policy makers may use these findings to review study results from an evidence-based perspective. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40273-021-01048-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8352823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83528232021-08-24 Aspects and Challenges of Resource Use Measurement in Health Economics: Towards a Comprehensive Measurement Framework Janssen, Luca M. M. Drost, Ruben M. W. A. Paulus, Aggie T. G. Garfield, Kirsty Hollingworth, William Noble, Sian Thorn, Joanna C. Pokhilenko, Irina Evers, Silvia M. A. A. Pharmacoeconomics Scoping Review BACKGROUND: While the methods for conducting health economics research in general are improving, current guidelines provide limited guidance regarding resource use measurement (RUM). Consequently, a variety of methods exists, yet there is no overview of aspects to consider when deciding on the most appropriate RUM methodology. Therefore, this study aims to (1) identify and categorize existing knowledge regarding aspects of RUM, and (2) develop a framework that provides a comprehensive overview of methodological aspects regarding RUM. METHODS: Relevant articles were identified by enrolling a search string in six databases and handsearching the DIRUM database. Included articles were descriptively reviewed and served as input for a comprehensive framework. Health economics experts were involved during the process to establish the framework’s face validity. RESULTS: Forty articles were included in the scoping review. The RUM framework consists of four methodological RUM domains: ‘Whom to measure’, addressing whom to ask and whom to measure; ‘How to measure’, addressing the different approaches of measurement; ‘How often to measure’, addressing recall period and measurement patterns; and ‘Additional considerations’, which covers additional aspects that are essential for further refining the methodologies for measurement. Evidence retrieved from the scoping review was categorized according to these domains. CONCLUSION: This study clustered the aspects of RUM methodology in health economics into a comprehensive framework. The results may guide health economists in their decision making regarding the selection of appropriate RUM methods and developing instruments for RUM. Furthermore, policy makers may use these findings to review study results from an evidence-based perspective. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40273-021-01048-z. Springer International Publishing 2021-06-25 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8352823/ /pubmed/34169466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-021-01048-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Scoping Review
Janssen, Luca M. M.
Drost, Ruben M. W. A.
Paulus, Aggie T. G.
Garfield, Kirsty
Hollingworth, William
Noble, Sian
Thorn, Joanna C.
Pokhilenko, Irina
Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
Aspects and Challenges of Resource Use Measurement in Health Economics: Towards a Comprehensive Measurement Framework
title Aspects and Challenges of Resource Use Measurement in Health Economics: Towards a Comprehensive Measurement Framework
title_full Aspects and Challenges of Resource Use Measurement in Health Economics: Towards a Comprehensive Measurement Framework
title_fullStr Aspects and Challenges of Resource Use Measurement in Health Economics: Towards a Comprehensive Measurement Framework
title_full_unstemmed Aspects and Challenges of Resource Use Measurement in Health Economics: Towards a Comprehensive Measurement Framework
title_short Aspects and Challenges of Resource Use Measurement in Health Economics: Towards a Comprehensive Measurement Framework
title_sort aspects and challenges of resource use measurement in health economics: towards a comprehensive measurement framework
topic Scoping Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34169466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-021-01048-z
work_keys_str_mv AT janssenlucamm aspectsandchallengesofresourceusemeasurementinhealtheconomicstowardsacomprehensivemeasurementframework
AT drostrubenmwa aspectsandchallengesofresourceusemeasurementinhealtheconomicstowardsacomprehensivemeasurementframework
AT paulusaggietg aspectsandchallengesofresourceusemeasurementinhealtheconomicstowardsacomprehensivemeasurementframework
AT garfieldkirsty aspectsandchallengesofresourceusemeasurementinhealtheconomicstowardsacomprehensivemeasurementframework
AT hollingworthwilliam aspectsandchallengesofresourceusemeasurementinhealtheconomicstowardsacomprehensivemeasurementframework
AT noblesian aspectsandchallengesofresourceusemeasurementinhealtheconomicstowardsacomprehensivemeasurementframework
AT thornjoannac aspectsandchallengesofresourceusemeasurementinhealtheconomicstowardsacomprehensivemeasurementframework
AT pokhilenkoirina aspectsandchallengesofresourceusemeasurementinhealtheconomicstowardsacomprehensivemeasurementframework
AT everssilviamaa aspectsandchallengesofresourceusemeasurementinhealtheconomicstowardsacomprehensivemeasurementframework