Cargando…

An ERP investigation of children and adolescents’ sensitivity to wins and losses during a peer observation manipulation

The purpose of this ERP P3 study was to test a peer observation manipulation (being observed by a peer versus being alone) on neural markers of attention to reward (win-feedback) and punishment (loss-feedback) during the Balloon Analogue Risk Task. Participants (126 children, 53 % male, 8–10 years;...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Willoughby, Teena, Heffer, Taylor, van Noordt, Stefon, Desjardins, James, Segalowitz, Sid, Schmidt, Louis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34364173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2021.100995
_version_ 1783736382879956992
author Willoughby, Teena
Heffer, Taylor
van Noordt, Stefon
Desjardins, James
Segalowitz, Sid
Schmidt, Louis
author_facet Willoughby, Teena
Heffer, Taylor
van Noordt, Stefon
Desjardins, James
Segalowitz, Sid
Schmidt, Louis
author_sort Willoughby, Teena
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this ERP P3 study was to test a peer observation manipulation (being observed by a peer versus being alone) on neural markers of attention to reward (win-feedback) and punishment (loss-feedback) during the Balloon Analogue Risk Task. Participants (126 children, 53 % male, 8–10 years; 196 early adolescents, 50 % male, 11–13 years; and 121 mid-adolescents, 52 % male, 14–16 years) were assessed by age group and pubertal status. Individual differences in how participants felt about being observed by a peer, and self-report personality factors, also were examined. Findings indicated that early and mid-adolescents (and individuals in mid-puberty and late-puberty) were sensitive to peer observation as both groups showed larger neural responses to loss-feedback in the peer condition than in the alone condition. Conversely, children (and individuals in pre- and early-puberty) were unaffected by peer observation. In addition, there clearly were individual differences in how rewarding versus anxiety-provoking participants found the peer experience. Early adolescents and mid-adolescents (and individuals in mid- and late-puberty) who reported feeling more anxious about the peer observation elicited larger neural responses to loss-feedback, and individuals in mid- and late-puberty in particular reported higher worry and lower sensation-seeking scores than those who reported a positive experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8353349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83533492021-08-15 An ERP investigation of children and adolescents’ sensitivity to wins and losses during a peer observation manipulation Willoughby, Teena Heffer, Taylor van Noordt, Stefon Desjardins, James Segalowitz, Sid Schmidt, Louis Dev Cogn Neurosci Original Research The purpose of this ERP P3 study was to test a peer observation manipulation (being observed by a peer versus being alone) on neural markers of attention to reward (win-feedback) and punishment (loss-feedback) during the Balloon Analogue Risk Task. Participants (126 children, 53 % male, 8–10 years; 196 early adolescents, 50 % male, 11–13 years; and 121 mid-adolescents, 52 % male, 14–16 years) were assessed by age group and pubertal status. Individual differences in how participants felt about being observed by a peer, and self-report personality factors, also were examined. Findings indicated that early and mid-adolescents (and individuals in mid-puberty and late-puberty) were sensitive to peer observation as both groups showed larger neural responses to loss-feedback in the peer condition than in the alone condition. Conversely, children (and individuals in pre- and early-puberty) were unaffected by peer observation. In addition, there clearly were individual differences in how rewarding versus anxiety-provoking participants found the peer experience. Early adolescents and mid-adolescents (and individuals in mid- and late-puberty) who reported feeling more anxious about the peer observation elicited larger neural responses to loss-feedback, and individuals in mid- and late-puberty in particular reported higher worry and lower sensation-seeking scores than those who reported a positive experience. Elsevier 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8353349/ /pubmed/34364173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2021.100995 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Willoughby, Teena
Heffer, Taylor
van Noordt, Stefon
Desjardins, James
Segalowitz, Sid
Schmidt, Louis
An ERP investigation of children and adolescents’ sensitivity to wins and losses during a peer observation manipulation
title An ERP investigation of children and adolescents’ sensitivity to wins and losses during a peer observation manipulation
title_full An ERP investigation of children and adolescents’ sensitivity to wins and losses during a peer observation manipulation
title_fullStr An ERP investigation of children and adolescents’ sensitivity to wins and losses during a peer observation manipulation
title_full_unstemmed An ERP investigation of children and adolescents’ sensitivity to wins and losses during a peer observation manipulation
title_short An ERP investigation of children and adolescents’ sensitivity to wins and losses during a peer observation manipulation
title_sort erp investigation of children and adolescents’ sensitivity to wins and losses during a peer observation manipulation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34364173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2021.100995
work_keys_str_mv AT willoughbyteena anerpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation
AT heffertaylor anerpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation
AT vannoordtstefon anerpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation
AT desjardinsjames anerpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation
AT segalowitzsid anerpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation
AT schmidtlouis anerpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation
AT willoughbyteena erpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation
AT heffertaylor erpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation
AT vannoordtstefon erpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation
AT desjardinsjames erpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation
AT segalowitzsid erpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation
AT schmidtlouis erpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation