Cargando…
An ERP investigation of children and adolescents’ sensitivity to wins and losses during a peer observation manipulation
The purpose of this ERP P3 study was to test a peer observation manipulation (being observed by a peer versus being alone) on neural markers of attention to reward (win-feedback) and punishment (loss-feedback) during the Balloon Analogue Risk Task. Participants (126 children, 53 % male, 8–10 years;...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34364173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2021.100995 |
_version_ | 1783736382879956992 |
---|---|
author | Willoughby, Teena Heffer, Taylor van Noordt, Stefon Desjardins, James Segalowitz, Sid Schmidt, Louis |
author_facet | Willoughby, Teena Heffer, Taylor van Noordt, Stefon Desjardins, James Segalowitz, Sid Schmidt, Louis |
author_sort | Willoughby, Teena |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this ERP P3 study was to test a peer observation manipulation (being observed by a peer versus being alone) on neural markers of attention to reward (win-feedback) and punishment (loss-feedback) during the Balloon Analogue Risk Task. Participants (126 children, 53 % male, 8–10 years; 196 early adolescents, 50 % male, 11–13 years; and 121 mid-adolescents, 52 % male, 14–16 years) were assessed by age group and pubertal status. Individual differences in how participants felt about being observed by a peer, and self-report personality factors, also were examined. Findings indicated that early and mid-adolescents (and individuals in mid-puberty and late-puberty) were sensitive to peer observation as both groups showed larger neural responses to loss-feedback in the peer condition than in the alone condition. Conversely, children (and individuals in pre- and early-puberty) were unaffected by peer observation. In addition, there clearly were individual differences in how rewarding versus anxiety-provoking participants found the peer experience. Early adolescents and mid-adolescents (and individuals in mid- and late-puberty) who reported feeling more anxious about the peer observation elicited larger neural responses to loss-feedback, and individuals in mid- and late-puberty in particular reported higher worry and lower sensation-seeking scores than those who reported a positive experience. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8353349 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83533492021-08-15 An ERP investigation of children and adolescents’ sensitivity to wins and losses during a peer observation manipulation Willoughby, Teena Heffer, Taylor van Noordt, Stefon Desjardins, James Segalowitz, Sid Schmidt, Louis Dev Cogn Neurosci Original Research The purpose of this ERP P3 study was to test a peer observation manipulation (being observed by a peer versus being alone) on neural markers of attention to reward (win-feedback) and punishment (loss-feedback) during the Balloon Analogue Risk Task. Participants (126 children, 53 % male, 8–10 years; 196 early adolescents, 50 % male, 11–13 years; and 121 mid-adolescents, 52 % male, 14–16 years) were assessed by age group and pubertal status. Individual differences in how participants felt about being observed by a peer, and self-report personality factors, also were examined. Findings indicated that early and mid-adolescents (and individuals in mid-puberty and late-puberty) were sensitive to peer observation as both groups showed larger neural responses to loss-feedback in the peer condition than in the alone condition. Conversely, children (and individuals in pre- and early-puberty) were unaffected by peer observation. In addition, there clearly were individual differences in how rewarding versus anxiety-provoking participants found the peer experience. Early adolescents and mid-adolescents (and individuals in mid- and late-puberty) who reported feeling more anxious about the peer observation elicited larger neural responses to loss-feedback, and individuals in mid- and late-puberty in particular reported higher worry and lower sensation-seeking scores than those who reported a positive experience. Elsevier 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8353349/ /pubmed/34364173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2021.100995 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Willoughby, Teena Heffer, Taylor van Noordt, Stefon Desjardins, James Segalowitz, Sid Schmidt, Louis An ERP investigation of children and adolescents’ sensitivity to wins and losses during a peer observation manipulation |
title | An ERP investigation of children and adolescents’ sensitivity to wins and losses during a peer observation manipulation |
title_full | An ERP investigation of children and adolescents’ sensitivity to wins and losses during a peer observation manipulation |
title_fullStr | An ERP investigation of children and adolescents’ sensitivity to wins and losses during a peer observation manipulation |
title_full_unstemmed | An ERP investigation of children and adolescents’ sensitivity to wins and losses during a peer observation manipulation |
title_short | An ERP investigation of children and adolescents’ sensitivity to wins and losses during a peer observation manipulation |
title_sort | erp investigation of children and adolescents’ sensitivity to wins and losses during a peer observation manipulation |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34364173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2021.100995 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT willoughbyteena anerpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation AT heffertaylor anerpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation AT vannoordtstefon anerpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation AT desjardinsjames anerpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation AT segalowitzsid anerpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation AT schmidtlouis anerpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation AT willoughbyteena erpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation AT heffertaylor erpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation AT vannoordtstefon erpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation AT desjardinsjames erpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation AT segalowitzsid erpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation AT schmidtlouis erpinvestigationofchildrenandadolescentssensitivitytowinsandlossesduringapeerobservationmanipulation |