Cargando…

Understanding Teach-Back and Teach-To-Goal Strategies Embedded in Support Calls for a Health Literacy-Sensitive Childhood Obesity Treatment Trial

BACKGROUND: Low caregiver health literacy (HL) is related to increased obesity risk for their children. Teach-Back and Teach-to-Goal (TB/TTG) are strategies that may improve comprehension of key concepts for people who have low HL but have yet to be examined in the context of childhood obesity treat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuhas, Maryam, Zoellner, Jamie, Hou, Xiaolu, Alexander, Ramine, Hill, Jennie, You, Wen, Estabrooks, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SLACK Incorporated 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8356482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34379548
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20210713-01
_version_ 1783736953356681216
author Yuhas, Maryam
Zoellner, Jamie
Hou, Xiaolu
Alexander, Ramine
Hill, Jennie
You, Wen
Estabrooks, Paul
author_facet Yuhas, Maryam
Zoellner, Jamie
Hou, Xiaolu
Alexander, Ramine
Hill, Jennie
You, Wen
Estabrooks, Paul
author_sort Yuhas, Maryam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low caregiver health literacy (HL) is related to increased obesity risk for their children. Teach-Back and Teach-to-Goal (TB/TTG) are strategies that may improve comprehension of key concepts for people who have low HL but have yet to be examined in the context of childhood obesity treatment. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated TB/TTG strategies integrated within support calls delivered to caregivers as part of a 3-month childhood obesity intervention. METHODS: Ninety-four caregivers (60% Black, 42% high school education or less, 53% with income ≤$29,999, and 34% low HL) with overweight/obese children age 8 to 12 years enrolled in a childhood obesity intervention. Caregiver HL was assessed at baseline using the Newest Vital Sign and caregivers were dichotomized to low and adequate HL groups for analyses. Caregivers received 6 bi-weekly support calls that alternated with in-person, family sessions. Call completion rates, comprehension of key content (correct responses on TB/TTG questions), and satisfaction with support calls were evaluated. Qualitative information on call satisfaction was gathered at the 3-month time point. KEY RESULTS: Average completion rate across all calls was 62% with a mean call time of 26 minutes (no significant difference between HL groups). Caregivers had an average score of 0.90 out of 1 when evaluating overall call comprehension by scoring TB/TTG performance. Content comprehension in calls 1, 3, and 4 was significantly higher among caregivers with adequate HL relative to low HL (p < .1). Caregivers from both HL groups felt satisfied with calls [9.1 (2.0)/10-point scale] and agreed that calls helped them learn class material better [8.1 (2.7)]. Qualitatively, caregivers provided 81 (75%) positive responses (e.g., good content) and 27 (25%) negative responses (e.g., too lengthy) regarding the support calls. CONCLUSIONS: Support calls using TB/TTG strategies were feasible, well received, and should be considered for incorporation into childhood obesity interventions. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2021;5(3):e208–e217.] PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This study evaluated support calls that used Teach-Back and Teach-to-Goal health literacy strategies as part of a childhood obesity treatment trial. Support calls were well accepted and facilitated comprehension of the key learning objectives in caregivers, regardless of health literacy level. These strategies should be considered for incorporation into childhood obesity treatment interventions to increase uptake of main concepts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8356482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SLACK Incorporated
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83564822021-08-13 Understanding Teach-Back and Teach-To-Goal Strategies Embedded in Support Calls for a Health Literacy-Sensitive Childhood Obesity Treatment Trial Yuhas, Maryam Zoellner, Jamie Hou, Xiaolu Alexander, Ramine Hill, Jennie You, Wen Estabrooks, Paul Health Lit Res Pract Original Research BACKGROUND: Low caregiver health literacy (HL) is related to increased obesity risk for their children. Teach-Back and Teach-to-Goal (TB/TTG) are strategies that may improve comprehension of key concepts for people who have low HL but have yet to be examined in the context of childhood obesity treatment. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated TB/TTG strategies integrated within support calls delivered to caregivers as part of a 3-month childhood obesity intervention. METHODS: Ninety-four caregivers (60% Black, 42% high school education or less, 53% with income ≤$29,999, and 34% low HL) with overweight/obese children age 8 to 12 years enrolled in a childhood obesity intervention. Caregiver HL was assessed at baseline using the Newest Vital Sign and caregivers were dichotomized to low and adequate HL groups for analyses. Caregivers received 6 bi-weekly support calls that alternated with in-person, family sessions. Call completion rates, comprehension of key content (correct responses on TB/TTG questions), and satisfaction with support calls were evaluated. Qualitative information on call satisfaction was gathered at the 3-month time point. KEY RESULTS: Average completion rate across all calls was 62% with a mean call time of 26 minutes (no significant difference between HL groups). Caregivers had an average score of 0.90 out of 1 when evaluating overall call comprehension by scoring TB/TTG performance. Content comprehension in calls 1, 3, and 4 was significantly higher among caregivers with adequate HL relative to low HL (p < .1). Caregivers from both HL groups felt satisfied with calls [9.1 (2.0)/10-point scale] and agreed that calls helped them learn class material better [8.1 (2.7)]. Qualitatively, caregivers provided 81 (75%) positive responses (e.g., good content) and 27 (25%) negative responses (e.g., too lengthy) regarding the support calls. CONCLUSIONS: Support calls using TB/TTG strategies were feasible, well received, and should be considered for incorporation into childhood obesity interventions. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2021;5(3):e208–e217.] PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This study evaluated support calls that used Teach-Back and Teach-to-Goal health literacy strategies as part of a childhood obesity treatment trial. Support calls were well accepted and facilitated comprehension of the key learning objectives in caregivers, regardless of health literacy level. These strategies should be considered for incorporation into childhood obesity treatment interventions to increase uptake of main concepts. SLACK Incorporated 2021-07 2021-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8356482/ /pubmed/34379548 http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20210713-01 Text en © 2021 Yuhas, Zoellner, Hou, et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). This license allows users to copy and distribute, to remix, transform, and build upon the article, for any purpose, even commercially, provided the author is attributed and is not represented as endorsing the use made of the work. Grant: This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health, the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R24MD008005), and the Fralin Translational Obesity Research Center at Virginia Tech.
spellingShingle Original Research
Yuhas, Maryam
Zoellner, Jamie
Hou, Xiaolu
Alexander, Ramine
Hill, Jennie
You, Wen
Estabrooks, Paul
Understanding Teach-Back and Teach-To-Goal Strategies Embedded in Support Calls for a Health Literacy-Sensitive Childhood Obesity Treatment Trial
title Understanding Teach-Back and Teach-To-Goal Strategies Embedded in Support Calls for a Health Literacy-Sensitive Childhood Obesity Treatment Trial
title_full Understanding Teach-Back and Teach-To-Goal Strategies Embedded in Support Calls for a Health Literacy-Sensitive Childhood Obesity Treatment Trial
title_fullStr Understanding Teach-Back and Teach-To-Goal Strategies Embedded in Support Calls for a Health Literacy-Sensitive Childhood Obesity Treatment Trial
title_full_unstemmed Understanding Teach-Back and Teach-To-Goal Strategies Embedded in Support Calls for a Health Literacy-Sensitive Childhood Obesity Treatment Trial
title_short Understanding Teach-Back and Teach-To-Goal Strategies Embedded in Support Calls for a Health Literacy-Sensitive Childhood Obesity Treatment Trial
title_sort understanding teach-back and teach-to-goal strategies embedded in support calls for a health literacy-sensitive childhood obesity treatment trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8356482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34379548
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20210713-01
work_keys_str_mv AT yuhasmaryam understandingteachbackandteachtogoalstrategiesembeddedinsupportcallsforahealthliteracysensitivechildhoodobesitytreatmenttrial
AT zoellnerjamie understandingteachbackandteachtogoalstrategiesembeddedinsupportcallsforahealthliteracysensitivechildhoodobesitytreatmenttrial
AT houxiaolu understandingteachbackandteachtogoalstrategiesembeddedinsupportcallsforahealthliteracysensitivechildhoodobesitytreatmenttrial
AT alexanderramine understandingteachbackandteachtogoalstrategiesembeddedinsupportcallsforahealthliteracysensitivechildhoodobesitytreatmenttrial
AT hilljennie understandingteachbackandteachtogoalstrategiesembeddedinsupportcallsforahealthliteracysensitivechildhoodobesitytreatmenttrial
AT youwen understandingteachbackandteachtogoalstrategiesembeddedinsupportcallsforahealthliteracysensitivechildhoodobesitytreatmenttrial
AT estabrookspaul understandingteachbackandteachtogoalstrategiesembeddedinsupportcallsforahealthliteracysensitivechildhoodobesitytreatmenttrial