Cargando…

The impact of artificial intelligence on clinical education: perceptions of postgraduate trainee doctors in London (UK) and recommendations for trainers

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are increasingly used in clinical practice. Although there is robust evidence that AI innovations can improve patient care, reduce clinicians’ workload and increase efficiency, their impact on medical training and education remains unclear. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Banerjee, Maya, Chiew, Daphne, Patel, Keval T., Johns, Ieuan, Chappell, Digby, Linton, Nick, Cole, Graham D., Francis, Darrel P., Szram, Jo, Ross, Jack, Zaman, Sameer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34391424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02870-x
_version_ 1783738456863670272
author Banerjee, Maya
Chiew, Daphne
Patel, Keval T.
Johns, Ieuan
Chappell, Digby
Linton, Nick
Cole, Graham D.
Francis, Darrel P.
Szram, Jo
Ross, Jack
Zaman, Sameer
author_facet Banerjee, Maya
Chiew, Daphne
Patel, Keval T.
Johns, Ieuan
Chappell, Digby
Linton, Nick
Cole, Graham D.
Francis, Darrel P.
Szram, Jo
Ross, Jack
Zaman, Sameer
author_sort Banerjee, Maya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are increasingly used in clinical practice. Although there is robust evidence that AI innovations can improve patient care, reduce clinicians’ workload and increase efficiency, their impact on medical training and education remains unclear. METHODS: A survey of trainee doctors’ perceived impact of AI technologies on clinical training and education was conducted at UK NHS postgraduate centers in London between October and December 2020. Impact assessment mirrored domains in training curricula such as ‘clinical judgement’, ‘practical skills’ and ‘research and quality improvement skills’. Significance between Likert-type data was analysed using Fisher’s exact test. Response variations between clinical specialities were analysed using k-modes clustering. Free-text responses were analysed by thematic analysis. RESULTS: Two hundred ten doctors responded to the survey (response rate 72%). The majority (58%) perceived an overall positive impact of AI technologies on their training and education. Respondents agreed that AI would reduce clinical workload (62%) and improve research and audit training (68%). Trainees were skeptical that it would improve clinical judgement (46% agree, p = 0.12) and practical skills training (32% agree, p < 0.01). The majority reported insufficient AI training in their current curricula (92%), and supported having more formal AI training (81%). CONCLUSIONS: Trainee doctors have an overall positive perception of AI technologies’ impact on clinical training. There is optimism that it will improve ‘research and quality improvement’ skills and facilitate ‘curriculum mapping’. There is skepticism that it may reduce educational opportunities to develop ‘clinical judgement’ and ‘practical skills’. Medical educators should be mindful that these domains are protected as AI develops. We recommend that ‘Applied AI’ topics are formalized in curricula and digital technologies leveraged to deliver clinical education. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-02870-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8364021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83640212021-08-17 The impact of artificial intelligence on clinical education: perceptions of postgraduate trainee doctors in London (UK) and recommendations for trainers Banerjee, Maya Chiew, Daphne Patel, Keval T. Johns, Ieuan Chappell, Digby Linton, Nick Cole, Graham D. Francis, Darrel P. Szram, Jo Ross, Jack Zaman, Sameer BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are increasingly used in clinical practice. Although there is robust evidence that AI innovations can improve patient care, reduce clinicians’ workload and increase efficiency, their impact on medical training and education remains unclear. METHODS: A survey of trainee doctors’ perceived impact of AI technologies on clinical training and education was conducted at UK NHS postgraduate centers in London between October and December 2020. Impact assessment mirrored domains in training curricula such as ‘clinical judgement’, ‘practical skills’ and ‘research and quality improvement skills’. Significance between Likert-type data was analysed using Fisher’s exact test. Response variations between clinical specialities were analysed using k-modes clustering. Free-text responses were analysed by thematic analysis. RESULTS: Two hundred ten doctors responded to the survey (response rate 72%). The majority (58%) perceived an overall positive impact of AI technologies on their training and education. Respondents agreed that AI would reduce clinical workload (62%) and improve research and audit training (68%). Trainees were skeptical that it would improve clinical judgement (46% agree, p = 0.12) and practical skills training (32% agree, p < 0.01). The majority reported insufficient AI training in their current curricula (92%), and supported having more formal AI training (81%). CONCLUSIONS: Trainee doctors have an overall positive perception of AI technologies’ impact on clinical training. There is optimism that it will improve ‘research and quality improvement’ skills and facilitate ‘curriculum mapping’. There is skepticism that it may reduce educational opportunities to develop ‘clinical judgement’ and ‘practical skills’. Medical educators should be mindful that these domains are protected as AI develops. We recommend that ‘Applied AI’ topics are formalized in curricula and digital technologies leveraged to deliver clinical education. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-02870-x. BioMed Central 2021-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8364021/ /pubmed/34391424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02870-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Banerjee, Maya
Chiew, Daphne
Patel, Keval T.
Johns, Ieuan
Chappell, Digby
Linton, Nick
Cole, Graham D.
Francis, Darrel P.
Szram, Jo
Ross, Jack
Zaman, Sameer
The impact of artificial intelligence on clinical education: perceptions of postgraduate trainee doctors in London (UK) and recommendations for trainers
title The impact of artificial intelligence on clinical education: perceptions of postgraduate trainee doctors in London (UK) and recommendations for trainers
title_full The impact of artificial intelligence on clinical education: perceptions of postgraduate trainee doctors in London (UK) and recommendations for trainers
title_fullStr The impact of artificial intelligence on clinical education: perceptions of postgraduate trainee doctors in London (UK) and recommendations for trainers
title_full_unstemmed The impact of artificial intelligence on clinical education: perceptions of postgraduate trainee doctors in London (UK) and recommendations for trainers
title_short The impact of artificial intelligence on clinical education: perceptions of postgraduate trainee doctors in London (UK) and recommendations for trainers
title_sort impact of artificial intelligence on clinical education: perceptions of postgraduate trainee doctors in london (uk) and recommendations for trainers
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34391424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02870-x
work_keys_str_mv AT banerjeemaya theimpactofartificialintelligenceonclinicaleducationperceptionsofpostgraduatetraineedoctorsinlondonukandrecommendationsfortrainers
AT chiewdaphne theimpactofartificialintelligenceonclinicaleducationperceptionsofpostgraduatetraineedoctorsinlondonukandrecommendationsfortrainers
AT patelkevalt theimpactofartificialintelligenceonclinicaleducationperceptionsofpostgraduatetraineedoctorsinlondonukandrecommendationsfortrainers
AT johnsieuan theimpactofartificialintelligenceonclinicaleducationperceptionsofpostgraduatetraineedoctorsinlondonukandrecommendationsfortrainers
AT chappelldigby theimpactofartificialintelligenceonclinicaleducationperceptionsofpostgraduatetraineedoctorsinlondonukandrecommendationsfortrainers
AT lintonnick theimpactofartificialintelligenceonclinicaleducationperceptionsofpostgraduatetraineedoctorsinlondonukandrecommendationsfortrainers
AT colegrahamd theimpactofartificialintelligenceonclinicaleducationperceptionsofpostgraduatetraineedoctorsinlondonukandrecommendationsfortrainers
AT francisdarrelp theimpactofartificialintelligenceonclinicaleducationperceptionsofpostgraduatetraineedoctorsinlondonukandrecommendationsfortrainers
AT szramjo theimpactofartificialintelligenceonclinicaleducationperceptionsofpostgraduatetraineedoctorsinlondonukandrecommendationsfortrainers
AT rossjack theimpactofartificialintelligenceonclinicaleducationperceptionsofpostgraduatetraineedoctorsinlondonukandrecommendationsfortrainers
AT zamansameer theimpactofartificialintelligenceonclinicaleducationperceptionsofpostgraduatetraineedoctorsinlondonukandrecommendationsfortrainers
AT banerjeemaya impactofartificialintelligenceonclinicaleducationperceptionsofpostgraduatetraineedoctorsinlondonukandrecommendationsfortrainers
AT chiewdaphne impactofartificialintelligenceonclinicaleducationperceptionsofpostgraduatetraineedoctorsinlondonukandrecommendationsfortrainers
AT patelkevalt impactofartificialintelligenceonclinicaleducationperceptionsofpostgraduatetraineedoctorsinlondonukandrecommendationsfortrainers
AT johnsieuan impactofartificialintelligenceonclinicaleducationperceptionsofpostgraduatetraineedoctorsinlondonukandrecommendationsfortrainers
AT chappelldigby impactofartificialintelligenceonclinicaleducationperceptionsofpostgraduatetraineedoctorsinlondonukandrecommendationsfortrainers
AT lintonnick impactofartificialintelligenceonclinicaleducationperceptionsofpostgraduatetraineedoctorsinlondonukandrecommendationsfortrainers
AT colegrahamd impactofartificialintelligenceonclinicaleducationperceptionsofpostgraduatetraineedoctorsinlondonukandrecommendationsfortrainers
AT francisdarrelp impactofartificialintelligenceonclinicaleducationperceptionsofpostgraduatetraineedoctorsinlondonukandrecommendationsfortrainers
AT szramjo impactofartificialintelligenceonclinicaleducationperceptionsofpostgraduatetraineedoctorsinlondonukandrecommendationsfortrainers
AT rossjack impactofartificialintelligenceonclinicaleducationperceptionsofpostgraduatetraineedoctorsinlondonukandrecommendationsfortrainers
AT zamansameer impactofartificialintelligenceonclinicaleducationperceptionsofpostgraduatetraineedoctorsinlondonukandrecommendationsfortrainers