Cargando…

Does being a coach benefit clinician-educators? A mixed methods study of faculty self-efficacy, job satisfaction and burnout

INTRODUCTION: Coaching is a growing clinician-educator role. Self-efficacy is a powerful faculty motivator that is associated positively with job satisfaction and negatively with burnout. This study examines self-efficacy, job satisfaction, and burnout in coaches and other clinician-educators. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elster, Martha J., O’Sullivan, Patricia S., Muller-Juge, Virginie, Sheu, Leslie, Kaiser, Sunitha V., Hauer, Karen E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8371581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34406613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00676-7
_version_ 1783739672235606016
author Elster, Martha J.
O’Sullivan, Patricia S.
Muller-Juge, Virginie
Sheu, Leslie
Kaiser, Sunitha V.
Hauer, Karen E.
author_facet Elster, Martha J.
O’Sullivan, Patricia S.
Muller-Juge, Virginie
Sheu, Leslie
Kaiser, Sunitha V.
Hauer, Karen E.
author_sort Elster, Martha J.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Coaching is a growing clinician-educator role. Self-efficacy is a powerful faculty motivator that is associated positively with job satisfaction and negatively with burnout. This study examines self-efficacy, job satisfaction, and burnout in coaches and other clinician-educators. METHODS: We conducted a mixed methods study using a quantitative survey followed by qualitative interviews of faculty at the University of California, San Francisco. Coaches (funded 20% full-time equivalents), faculty with other funded education positions (“funded”), and faculty without funded education positions (“unfunded”) completed a 48-item survey addressing self-efficacy (teaching, professional development, and scholarship), job satisfaction, and burnout. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance followed by post-hoc tests and chi-square tests. To elaborate quantitative results, we conducted qualitative interviews of 15 faculty and analyzed data using framework analysis. RESULTS: 202 of 384 faculty (52.6%) responded to the survey; 187 complete surveys were analyzed. Teaching self-efficacy was similar across groups. Coaches and funded educators had significantly higher professional development self-efficacy and job satisfaction than unfunded educators. Burnout was more prevalent in coaches and unfunded educators. Qualitative analysis yielded three themes: sources of reward, academic identity, and strategies to mitigate burnout. Educator roles provide reward that enhances self-efficacy and job satisfaction but also generate competing demands. Coaches cited challenges in forming professional identities and working with struggling learners. DISCUSSION: The coaching role provides faculty with benefits similar to other funded educator roles, but the particular demands of the coach role may contribute to burnout. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-021-00676-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8371581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83715812021-08-18 Does being a coach benefit clinician-educators? A mixed methods study of faculty self-efficacy, job satisfaction and burnout Elster, Martha J. O’Sullivan, Patricia S. Muller-Juge, Virginie Sheu, Leslie Kaiser, Sunitha V. Hauer, Karen E. Perspect Med Educ Original Article INTRODUCTION: Coaching is a growing clinician-educator role. Self-efficacy is a powerful faculty motivator that is associated positively with job satisfaction and negatively with burnout. This study examines self-efficacy, job satisfaction, and burnout in coaches and other clinician-educators. METHODS: We conducted a mixed methods study using a quantitative survey followed by qualitative interviews of faculty at the University of California, San Francisco. Coaches (funded 20% full-time equivalents), faculty with other funded education positions (“funded”), and faculty without funded education positions (“unfunded”) completed a 48-item survey addressing self-efficacy (teaching, professional development, and scholarship), job satisfaction, and burnout. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance followed by post-hoc tests and chi-square tests. To elaborate quantitative results, we conducted qualitative interviews of 15 faculty and analyzed data using framework analysis. RESULTS: 202 of 384 faculty (52.6%) responded to the survey; 187 complete surveys were analyzed. Teaching self-efficacy was similar across groups. Coaches and funded educators had significantly higher professional development self-efficacy and job satisfaction than unfunded educators. Burnout was more prevalent in coaches and unfunded educators. Qualitative analysis yielded three themes: sources of reward, academic identity, and strategies to mitigate burnout. Educator roles provide reward that enhances self-efficacy and job satisfaction but also generate competing demands. Coaches cited challenges in forming professional identities and working with struggling learners. DISCUSSION: The coaching role provides faculty with benefits similar to other funded educator roles, but the particular demands of the coach role may contribute to burnout. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-021-00676-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2021-08-18 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8371581/ /pubmed/34406613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00676-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Elster, Martha J.
O’Sullivan, Patricia S.
Muller-Juge, Virginie
Sheu, Leslie
Kaiser, Sunitha V.
Hauer, Karen E.
Does being a coach benefit clinician-educators? A mixed methods study of faculty self-efficacy, job satisfaction and burnout
title Does being a coach benefit clinician-educators? A mixed methods study of faculty self-efficacy, job satisfaction and burnout
title_full Does being a coach benefit clinician-educators? A mixed methods study of faculty self-efficacy, job satisfaction and burnout
title_fullStr Does being a coach benefit clinician-educators? A mixed methods study of faculty self-efficacy, job satisfaction and burnout
title_full_unstemmed Does being a coach benefit clinician-educators? A mixed methods study of faculty self-efficacy, job satisfaction and burnout
title_short Does being a coach benefit clinician-educators? A mixed methods study of faculty self-efficacy, job satisfaction and burnout
title_sort does being a coach benefit clinician-educators? a mixed methods study of faculty self-efficacy, job satisfaction and burnout
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8371581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34406613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00676-7
work_keys_str_mv AT elstermarthaj doesbeingacoachbenefitclinicianeducatorsamixedmethodsstudyoffacultyselfefficacyjobsatisfactionandburnout
AT osullivanpatricias doesbeingacoachbenefitclinicianeducatorsamixedmethodsstudyoffacultyselfefficacyjobsatisfactionandburnout
AT mullerjugevirginie doesbeingacoachbenefitclinicianeducatorsamixedmethodsstudyoffacultyselfefficacyjobsatisfactionandburnout
AT sheuleslie doesbeingacoachbenefitclinicianeducatorsamixedmethodsstudyoffacultyselfefficacyjobsatisfactionandburnout
AT kaisersunithav doesbeingacoachbenefitclinicianeducatorsamixedmethodsstudyoffacultyselfefficacyjobsatisfactionandburnout
AT hauerkarene doesbeingacoachbenefitclinicianeducatorsamixedmethodsstudyoffacultyselfefficacyjobsatisfactionandburnout