Cargando…
Does being a coach benefit clinician-educators? A mixed methods study of faculty self-efficacy, job satisfaction and burnout
INTRODUCTION: Coaching is a growing clinician-educator role. Self-efficacy is a powerful faculty motivator that is associated positively with job satisfaction and negatively with burnout. This study examines self-efficacy, job satisfaction, and burnout in coaches and other clinician-educators. METHO...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8371581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34406613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00676-7 |
_version_ | 1783739672235606016 |
---|---|
author | Elster, Martha J. O’Sullivan, Patricia S. Muller-Juge, Virginie Sheu, Leslie Kaiser, Sunitha V. Hauer, Karen E. |
author_facet | Elster, Martha J. O’Sullivan, Patricia S. Muller-Juge, Virginie Sheu, Leslie Kaiser, Sunitha V. Hauer, Karen E. |
author_sort | Elster, Martha J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Coaching is a growing clinician-educator role. Self-efficacy is a powerful faculty motivator that is associated positively with job satisfaction and negatively with burnout. This study examines self-efficacy, job satisfaction, and burnout in coaches and other clinician-educators. METHODS: We conducted a mixed methods study using a quantitative survey followed by qualitative interviews of faculty at the University of California, San Francisco. Coaches (funded 20% full-time equivalents), faculty with other funded education positions (“funded”), and faculty without funded education positions (“unfunded”) completed a 48-item survey addressing self-efficacy (teaching, professional development, and scholarship), job satisfaction, and burnout. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance followed by post-hoc tests and chi-square tests. To elaborate quantitative results, we conducted qualitative interviews of 15 faculty and analyzed data using framework analysis. RESULTS: 202 of 384 faculty (52.6%) responded to the survey; 187 complete surveys were analyzed. Teaching self-efficacy was similar across groups. Coaches and funded educators had significantly higher professional development self-efficacy and job satisfaction than unfunded educators. Burnout was more prevalent in coaches and unfunded educators. Qualitative analysis yielded three themes: sources of reward, academic identity, and strategies to mitigate burnout. Educator roles provide reward that enhances self-efficacy and job satisfaction but also generate competing demands. Coaches cited challenges in forming professional identities and working with struggling learners. DISCUSSION: The coaching role provides faculty with benefits similar to other funded educator roles, but the particular demands of the coach role may contribute to burnout. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-021-00676-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8371581 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Bohn Stafleu van Loghum |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83715812021-08-18 Does being a coach benefit clinician-educators? A mixed methods study of faculty self-efficacy, job satisfaction and burnout Elster, Martha J. O’Sullivan, Patricia S. Muller-Juge, Virginie Sheu, Leslie Kaiser, Sunitha V. Hauer, Karen E. Perspect Med Educ Original Article INTRODUCTION: Coaching is a growing clinician-educator role. Self-efficacy is a powerful faculty motivator that is associated positively with job satisfaction and negatively with burnout. This study examines self-efficacy, job satisfaction, and burnout in coaches and other clinician-educators. METHODS: We conducted a mixed methods study using a quantitative survey followed by qualitative interviews of faculty at the University of California, San Francisco. Coaches (funded 20% full-time equivalents), faculty with other funded education positions (“funded”), and faculty without funded education positions (“unfunded”) completed a 48-item survey addressing self-efficacy (teaching, professional development, and scholarship), job satisfaction, and burnout. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance followed by post-hoc tests and chi-square tests. To elaborate quantitative results, we conducted qualitative interviews of 15 faculty and analyzed data using framework analysis. RESULTS: 202 of 384 faculty (52.6%) responded to the survey; 187 complete surveys were analyzed. Teaching self-efficacy was similar across groups. Coaches and funded educators had significantly higher professional development self-efficacy and job satisfaction than unfunded educators. Burnout was more prevalent in coaches and unfunded educators. Qualitative analysis yielded three themes: sources of reward, academic identity, and strategies to mitigate burnout. Educator roles provide reward that enhances self-efficacy and job satisfaction but also generate competing demands. Coaches cited challenges in forming professional identities and working with struggling learners. DISCUSSION: The coaching role provides faculty with benefits similar to other funded educator roles, but the particular demands of the coach role may contribute to burnout. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-021-00676-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2021-08-18 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8371581/ /pubmed/34406613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00676-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Elster, Martha J. O’Sullivan, Patricia S. Muller-Juge, Virginie Sheu, Leslie Kaiser, Sunitha V. Hauer, Karen E. Does being a coach benefit clinician-educators? A mixed methods study of faculty self-efficacy, job satisfaction and burnout |
title | Does being a coach benefit clinician-educators? A mixed methods study of faculty self-efficacy, job satisfaction and burnout |
title_full | Does being a coach benefit clinician-educators? A mixed methods study of faculty self-efficacy, job satisfaction and burnout |
title_fullStr | Does being a coach benefit clinician-educators? A mixed methods study of faculty self-efficacy, job satisfaction and burnout |
title_full_unstemmed | Does being a coach benefit clinician-educators? A mixed methods study of faculty self-efficacy, job satisfaction and burnout |
title_short | Does being a coach benefit clinician-educators? A mixed methods study of faculty self-efficacy, job satisfaction and burnout |
title_sort | does being a coach benefit clinician-educators? a mixed methods study of faculty self-efficacy, job satisfaction and burnout |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8371581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34406613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00676-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elstermarthaj doesbeingacoachbenefitclinicianeducatorsamixedmethodsstudyoffacultyselfefficacyjobsatisfactionandburnout AT osullivanpatricias doesbeingacoachbenefitclinicianeducatorsamixedmethodsstudyoffacultyselfefficacyjobsatisfactionandburnout AT mullerjugevirginie doesbeingacoachbenefitclinicianeducatorsamixedmethodsstudyoffacultyselfefficacyjobsatisfactionandburnout AT sheuleslie doesbeingacoachbenefitclinicianeducatorsamixedmethodsstudyoffacultyselfefficacyjobsatisfactionandburnout AT kaisersunithav doesbeingacoachbenefitclinicianeducatorsamixedmethodsstudyoffacultyselfefficacyjobsatisfactionandburnout AT hauerkarene doesbeingacoachbenefitclinicianeducatorsamixedmethodsstudyoffacultyselfefficacyjobsatisfactionandburnout |