Cargando…

Exploring the acute affective responses to resistance training: A comparison of the predetermined and the estimated repetitions to failure approaches

BACKGROUND: In resistance-training (RT), the number of repetitions is traditionally prescribed using a predetermined approach (e.g., three sets of 10 repetitions). An emerging alternative is the estimated repetitions to failure (ERF) approach (e.g., terminating sets two repetitions from failure). De...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwartz, Hadar, Emanuel, Aviv, Rozen Samukas, Isaac Isur, Halperin, Israel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8372906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34407124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256231
_version_ 1783739851899666432
author Schwartz, Hadar
Emanuel, Aviv
Rozen Samukas, Isaac Isur
Halperin, Israel
author_facet Schwartz, Hadar
Emanuel, Aviv
Rozen Samukas, Isaac Isur
Halperin, Israel
author_sort Schwartz, Hadar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In resistance-training (RT), the number of repetitions is traditionally prescribed using a predetermined approach (e.g., three sets of 10 repetitions). An emerging alternative is the estimated repetitions to failure (ERF) approach (e.g., terminating sets two repetitions from failure). Despite the importance of affective responses experienced during RT, a comparison between the two approaches on such outcomes is lacking. METHODS: Twenty women (age range: 23–45 years) without RT experience completed estimated one repetition maximum (RM) tests in four exercises. In the next two counterbalanced sessions, participants performed the exercises using 70%1RM. Participants completed ten repetitions in all three sets (predetermined condition) or terminated the sets when perceived to be two repetitions away from task-failure (ERF condition). Primary outcomes were affective-valence, enjoyment, and approach-preference and secondary outcomes were repetition-numbers completed in each exercise. RESULTS: We observed trivial differences in the subjective measures and an approximately even approach-preference split. Under the ERF condition, we observed greater variability in repetition-numbers between participants and across exercises. Specifically, the mean number of repetitions was slightly lower in the chest-press, knee-extension, and lat-pulldown (~1 repetition) but considerably higher in the leg-press (17 vs. 10, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Both approaches led to comparable affective responses and to an approximately even approach preference. Hence, prior to prescribing either approach, coaches should consider trainee’s preferences. Moreover, under the ERF condition participants completed a dissimilar number of repetitions across exercises while presumably reaching a similar proximity to task-failure. This finding suggests that ERF allows for better effort regulation between exercises.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8372906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83729062021-08-19 Exploring the acute affective responses to resistance training: A comparison of the predetermined and the estimated repetitions to failure approaches Schwartz, Hadar Emanuel, Aviv Rozen Samukas, Isaac Isur Halperin, Israel PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In resistance-training (RT), the number of repetitions is traditionally prescribed using a predetermined approach (e.g., three sets of 10 repetitions). An emerging alternative is the estimated repetitions to failure (ERF) approach (e.g., terminating sets two repetitions from failure). Despite the importance of affective responses experienced during RT, a comparison between the two approaches on such outcomes is lacking. METHODS: Twenty women (age range: 23–45 years) without RT experience completed estimated one repetition maximum (RM) tests in four exercises. In the next two counterbalanced sessions, participants performed the exercises using 70%1RM. Participants completed ten repetitions in all three sets (predetermined condition) or terminated the sets when perceived to be two repetitions away from task-failure (ERF condition). Primary outcomes were affective-valence, enjoyment, and approach-preference and secondary outcomes were repetition-numbers completed in each exercise. RESULTS: We observed trivial differences in the subjective measures and an approximately even approach-preference split. Under the ERF condition, we observed greater variability in repetition-numbers between participants and across exercises. Specifically, the mean number of repetitions was slightly lower in the chest-press, knee-extension, and lat-pulldown (~1 repetition) but considerably higher in the leg-press (17 vs. 10, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Both approaches led to comparable affective responses and to an approximately even approach preference. Hence, prior to prescribing either approach, coaches should consider trainee’s preferences. Moreover, under the ERF condition participants completed a dissimilar number of repetitions across exercises while presumably reaching a similar proximity to task-failure. This finding suggests that ERF allows for better effort regulation between exercises. Public Library of Science 2021-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8372906/ /pubmed/34407124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256231 Text en © 2021 Schwartz et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schwartz, Hadar
Emanuel, Aviv
Rozen Samukas, Isaac Isur
Halperin, Israel
Exploring the acute affective responses to resistance training: A comparison of the predetermined and the estimated repetitions to failure approaches
title Exploring the acute affective responses to resistance training: A comparison of the predetermined and the estimated repetitions to failure approaches
title_full Exploring the acute affective responses to resistance training: A comparison of the predetermined and the estimated repetitions to failure approaches
title_fullStr Exploring the acute affective responses to resistance training: A comparison of the predetermined and the estimated repetitions to failure approaches
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the acute affective responses to resistance training: A comparison of the predetermined and the estimated repetitions to failure approaches
title_short Exploring the acute affective responses to resistance training: A comparison of the predetermined and the estimated repetitions to failure approaches
title_sort exploring the acute affective responses to resistance training: a comparison of the predetermined and the estimated repetitions to failure approaches
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8372906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34407124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256231
work_keys_str_mv AT schwartzhadar exploringtheacuteaffectiveresponsestoresistancetrainingacomparisonofthepredeterminedandtheestimatedrepetitionstofailureapproaches
AT emanuelaviv exploringtheacuteaffectiveresponsestoresistancetrainingacomparisonofthepredeterminedandtheestimatedrepetitionstofailureapproaches
AT rozensamukasisaacisur exploringtheacuteaffectiveresponsestoresistancetrainingacomparisonofthepredeterminedandtheestimatedrepetitionstofailureapproaches
AT halperinisrael exploringtheacuteaffectiveresponsestoresistancetrainingacomparisonofthepredeterminedandtheestimatedrepetitionstofailureapproaches