Cargando…
Exploring the acute affective responses to resistance training: A comparison of the predetermined and the estimated repetitions to failure approaches
BACKGROUND: In resistance-training (RT), the number of repetitions is traditionally prescribed using a predetermined approach (e.g., three sets of 10 repetitions). An emerging alternative is the estimated repetitions to failure (ERF) approach (e.g., terminating sets two repetitions from failure). De...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8372906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34407124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256231 |
_version_ | 1783739851899666432 |
---|---|
author | Schwartz, Hadar Emanuel, Aviv Rozen Samukas, Isaac Isur Halperin, Israel |
author_facet | Schwartz, Hadar Emanuel, Aviv Rozen Samukas, Isaac Isur Halperin, Israel |
author_sort | Schwartz, Hadar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In resistance-training (RT), the number of repetitions is traditionally prescribed using a predetermined approach (e.g., three sets of 10 repetitions). An emerging alternative is the estimated repetitions to failure (ERF) approach (e.g., terminating sets two repetitions from failure). Despite the importance of affective responses experienced during RT, a comparison between the two approaches on such outcomes is lacking. METHODS: Twenty women (age range: 23–45 years) without RT experience completed estimated one repetition maximum (RM) tests in four exercises. In the next two counterbalanced sessions, participants performed the exercises using 70%1RM. Participants completed ten repetitions in all three sets (predetermined condition) or terminated the sets when perceived to be two repetitions away from task-failure (ERF condition). Primary outcomes were affective-valence, enjoyment, and approach-preference and secondary outcomes were repetition-numbers completed in each exercise. RESULTS: We observed trivial differences in the subjective measures and an approximately even approach-preference split. Under the ERF condition, we observed greater variability in repetition-numbers between participants and across exercises. Specifically, the mean number of repetitions was slightly lower in the chest-press, knee-extension, and lat-pulldown (~1 repetition) but considerably higher in the leg-press (17 vs. 10, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Both approaches led to comparable affective responses and to an approximately even approach preference. Hence, prior to prescribing either approach, coaches should consider trainee’s preferences. Moreover, under the ERF condition participants completed a dissimilar number of repetitions across exercises while presumably reaching a similar proximity to task-failure. This finding suggests that ERF allows for better effort regulation between exercises. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8372906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83729062021-08-19 Exploring the acute affective responses to resistance training: A comparison of the predetermined and the estimated repetitions to failure approaches Schwartz, Hadar Emanuel, Aviv Rozen Samukas, Isaac Isur Halperin, Israel PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In resistance-training (RT), the number of repetitions is traditionally prescribed using a predetermined approach (e.g., three sets of 10 repetitions). An emerging alternative is the estimated repetitions to failure (ERF) approach (e.g., terminating sets two repetitions from failure). Despite the importance of affective responses experienced during RT, a comparison between the two approaches on such outcomes is lacking. METHODS: Twenty women (age range: 23–45 years) without RT experience completed estimated one repetition maximum (RM) tests in four exercises. In the next two counterbalanced sessions, participants performed the exercises using 70%1RM. Participants completed ten repetitions in all three sets (predetermined condition) or terminated the sets when perceived to be two repetitions away from task-failure (ERF condition). Primary outcomes were affective-valence, enjoyment, and approach-preference and secondary outcomes were repetition-numbers completed in each exercise. RESULTS: We observed trivial differences in the subjective measures and an approximately even approach-preference split. Under the ERF condition, we observed greater variability in repetition-numbers between participants and across exercises. Specifically, the mean number of repetitions was slightly lower in the chest-press, knee-extension, and lat-pulldown (~1 repetition) but considerably higher in the leg-press (17 vs. 10, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Both approaches led to comparable affective responses and to an approximately even approach preference. Hence, prior to prescribing either approach, coaches should consider trainee’s preferences. Moreover, under the ERF condition participants completed a dissimilar number of repetitions across exercises while presumably reaching a similar proximity to task-failure. This finding suggests that ERF allows for better effort regulation between exercises. Public Library of Science 2021-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8372906/ /pubmed/34407124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256231 Text en © 2021 Schwartz et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schwartz, Hadar Emanuel, Aviv Rozen Samukas, Isaac Isur Halperin, Israel Exploring the acute affective responses to resistance training: A comparison of the predetermined and the estimated repetitions to failure approaches |
title | Exploring the acute affective responses to resistance training: A comparison of the predetermined and the estimated repetitions to failure approaches |
title_full | Exploring the acute affective responses to resistance training: A comparison of the predetermined and the estimated repetitions to failure approaches |
title_fullStr | Exploring the acute affective responses to resistance training: A comparison of the predetermined and the estimated repetitions to failure approaches |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring the acute affective responses to resistance training: A comparison of the predetermined and the estimated repetitions to failure approaches |
title_short | Exploring the acute affective responses to resistance training: A comparison of the predetermined and the estimated repetitions to failure approaches |
title_sort | exploring the acute affective responses to resistance training: a comparison of the predetermined and the estimated repetitions to failure approaches |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8372906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34407124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256231 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schwartzhadar exploringtheacuteaffectiveresponsestoresistancetrainingacomparisonofthepredeterminedandtheestimatedrepetitionstofailureapproaches AT emanuelaviv exploringtheacuteaffectiveresponsestoresistancetrainingacomparisonofthepredeterminedandtheestimatedrepetitionstofailureapproaches AT rozensamukasisaacisur exploringtheacuteaffectiveresponsestoresistancetrainingacomparisonofthepredeterminedandtheestimatedrepetitionstofailureapproaches AT halperinisrael exploringtheacuteaffectiveresponsestoresistancetrainingacomparisonofthepredeterminedandtheestimatedrepetitionstofailureapproaches |