Cargando…
Long-term effect of α(1)-antitrypsin augmentation therapy on the decline of FEV(1) in deficient patients: an analysis of the AIR database
BACKGROUND: Patients with ZZ (Glu342Lys) α-1-antitrypsin deficiency (ZZ-AATD) who received augmentation therapy with α-1-antitrypsin (AAT) in randomised controlled trials over 2–3 years failed to show a significant reduction of the annual decline of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)). METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Respiratory Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34435030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00194-2021 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Patients with ZZ (Glu342Lys) α-1-antitrypsin deficiency (ZZ-AATD) who received augmentation therapy with α-1-antitrypsin (AAT) in randomised controlled trials over 2–3 years failed to show a significant reduction of the annual decline of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)). METHODS: To compare the trajectory of FEV(1) change during 4 or more years in ZZ-AATD patients with emphysema receiving or not receiving intravenous augmentation therapy, a retrospective analysis of FEV(1) values entered in the Alpha-1 International Registry (AIR) of ZZ-AATD patients from five different European countries (Germany, UK, Spain, Italy and the Netherlands) was performed. The post-bronchodilator FEV(1) % predicted values for baseline and follow-up over time from patients were analysed using linear mixed effects models. RESULTS: Data of 374 patients were analysed: 246 untreated and 128 treated with intravenous AAT augmentation therapy. The mean±sd follow-up duration of the untreated group was 8.60±3.34 years and 8.59±2.62 years for the treated group. The mixed effects model analysis showed a mean FEV(1) decline of −0.931% predicted per year (95% CI −1.144 to −0.718) in the untreated group and a decline of −1.016% predicted per year (95% CI −1.319 to −0.7145) in the treated group. The likelihood ratio test showed no difference between the two groups (p=0.71). CONCLUSION: In our study population, we could not detect a significant difference in the annual decline of FEV(1) by AAT augmentation treatment over a mean period of 8.6 years. Other approaches are needed to validate any benefit of augmentation therapy. |
---|