Cargando…
Understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: What works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? A systematic realist review protocol
BACKGROUND: Work participation among employees with common mental disorders (CMDs) is an increasingly important, yet highly complex phenomenon. Given the call for preventing instead of reacting to negative work outcomes, there is a need to understand how employees with CMDs can continue working. OBJ...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
IOS Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8385521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34180455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/WOR-213515 |
_version_ | 1783742111029395456 |
---|---|
author | van Hees, Suzanne G.M. Carlier, Bouwine E. Blonk, Roland W.B. Oomens, Shirley |
author_facet | van Hees, Suzanne G.M. Carlier, Bouwine E. Blonk, Roland W.B. Oomens, Shirley |
author_sort | van Hees, Suzanne G.M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Work participation among employees with common mental disorders (CMDs) is an increasingly important, yet highly complex phenomenon. Given the call for preventing instead of reacting to negative work outcomes, there is a need to understand how employees with CMDs can continue working. OBJECTIVES: 1) to provide insights in applying a realist approach to the literature review process and 2) to present a way to develop an explanatory framework on work participation, the related causal mechanisms and the interaction with the work context. METHODS: A systematic realist literature review, using stay at work (SAW) and work performance (WP) as outcomes of work participation. This protocol paper explains the rationale, tools and procedures developed and used for identification, selection, appraisal and synthesis of included studies. RESULTS: The review process entailed six steps to develop so called ‘middle range program theories’. Each step followed a systematic, iterative procedure using context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting a realist review adds on the understanding to promote work participation, by examining the heterogeneity and complexity of intervention- and observational studies. This paper facilitates other researchers within the field of occupational health by demonstrating ways to develop a framework on work participation using realist synthesis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8385521 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | IOS Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83855212021-09-09 Understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: What works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? A systematic realist review protocol van Hees, Suzanne G.M. Carlier, Bouwine E. Blonk, Roland W.B. Oomens, Shirley Work Research Article BACKGROUND: Work participation among employees with common mental disorders (CMDs) is an increasingly important, yet highly complex phenomenon. Given the call for preventing instead of reacting to negative work outcomes, there is a need to understand how employees with CMDs can continue working. OBJECTIVES: 1) to provide insights in applying a realist approach to the literature review process and 2) to present a way to develop an explanatory framework on work participation, the related causal mechanisms and the interaction with the work context. METHODS: A systematic realist literature review, using stay at work (SAW) and work performance (WP) as outcomes of work participation. This protocol paper explains the rationale, tools and procedures developed and used for identification, selection, appraisal and synthesis of included studies. RESULTS: The review process entailed six steps to develop so called ‘middle range program theories’. Each step followed a systematic, iterative procedure using context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting a realist review adds on the understanding to promote work participation, by examining the heterogeneity and complexity of intervention- and observational studies. This paper facilitates other researchers within the field of occupational health by demonstrating ways to develop a framework on work participation using realist synthesis. IOS Press 2021-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8385521/ /pubmed/34180455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/WOR-213515 Text en © 2021 – The authors. Published by IOS Press https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van Hees, Suzanne G.M. Carlier, Bouwine E. Blonk, Roland W.B. Oomens, Shirley Understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: What works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? A systematic realist review protocol |
title | Understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: What works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? A systematic realist review protocol |
title_full | Understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: What works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? A systematic realist review protocol |
title_fullStr | Understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: What works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? A systematic realist review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: What works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? A systematic realist review protocol |
title_short | Understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: What works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? A systematic realist review protocol |
title_sort | understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: what works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? a systematic realist review protocol |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8385521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34180455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/WOR-213515 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanheessuzannegm understandingworkparticipationamongemployeeswithcommonmentaldisorderswhatworksforwhomunderwhatcircumstancesandhowasystematicrealistreviewprotocol AT carlierbouwinee understandingworkparticipationamongemployeeswithcommonmentaldisorderswhatworksforwhomunderwhatcircumstancesandhowasystematicrealistreviewprotocol AT blonkrolandwb understandingworkparticipationamongemployeeswithcommonmentaldisorderswhatworksforwhomunderwhatcircumstancesandhowasystematicrealistreviewprotocol AT oomensshirley understandingworkparticipationamongemployeeswithcommonmentaldisorderswhatworksforwhomunderwhatcircumstancesandhowasystematicrealistreviewprotocol |