Cargando…

Understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: What works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? A systematic realist review protocol

BACKGROUND: Work participation among employees with common mental disorders (CMDs) is an increasingly important, yet highly complex phenomenon. Given the call for preventing instead of reacting to negative work outcomes, there is a need to understand how employees with CMDs can continue working. OBJ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Hees, Suzanne G.M., Carlier, Bouwine E., Blonk, Roland W.B., Oomens, Shirley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8385521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34180455
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/WOR-213515
_version_ 1783742111029395456
author van Hees, Suzanne G.M.
Carlier, Bouwine E.
Blonk, Roland W.B.
Oomens, Shirley
author_facet van Hees, Suzanne G.M.
Carlier, Bouwine E.
Blonk, Roland W.B.
Oomens, Shirley
author_sort van Hees, Suzanne G.M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Work participation among employees with common mental disorders (CMDs) is an increasingly important, yet highly complex phenomenon. Given the call for preventing instead of reacting to negative work outcomes, there is a need to understand how employees with CMDs can continue working. OBJECTIVES: 1) to provide insights in applying a realist approach to the literature review process and 2) to present a way to develop an explanatory framework on work participation, the related causal mechanisms and the interaction with the work context. METHODS: A systematic realist literature review, using stay at work (SAW) and work performance (WP) as outcomes of work participation. This protocol paper explains the rationale, tools and procedures developed and used for identification, selection, appraisal and synthesis of included studies. RESULTS: The review process entailed six steps to develop so called ‘middle range program theories’. Each step followed a systematic, iterative procedure using context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting a realist review adds on the understanding to promote work participation, by examining the heterogeneity and complexity of intervention- and observational studies. This paper facilitates other researchers within the field of occupational health by demonstrating ways to develop a framework on work participation using realist synthesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8385521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83855212021-09-09 Understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: What works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? A systematic realist review protocol van Hees, Suzanne G.M. Carlier, Bouwine E. Blonk, Roland W.B. Oomens, Shirley Work Research Article BACKGROUND: Work participation among employees with common mental disorders (CMDs) is an increasingly important, yet highly complex phenomenon. Given the call for preventing instead of reacting to negative work outcomes, there is a need to understand how employees with CMDs can continue working. OBJECTIVES: 1) to provide insights in applying a realist approach to the literature review process and 2) to present a way to develop an explanatory framework on work participation, the related causal mechanisms and the interaction with the work context. METHODS: A systematic realist literature review, using stay at work (SAW) and work performance (WP) as outcomes of work participation. This protocol paper explains the rationale, tools and procedures developed and used for identification, selection, appraisal and synthesis of included studies. RESULTS: The review process entailed six steps to develop so called ‘middle range program theories’. Each step followed a systematic, iterative procedure using context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting a realist review adds on the understanding to promote work participation, by examining the heterogeneity and complexity of intervention- and observational studies. This paper facilitates other researchers within the field of occupational health by demonstrating ways to develop a framework on work participation using realist synthesis. IOS Press 2021-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8385521/ /pubmed/34180455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/WOR-213515 Text en © 2021 – The authors. Published by IOS Press https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Hees, Suzanne G.M.
Carlier, Bouwine E.
Blonk, Roland W.B.
Oomens, Shirley
Understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: What works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? A systematic realist review protocol
title Understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: What works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? A systematic realist review protocol
title_full Understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: What works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? A systematic realist review protocol
title_fullStr Understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: What works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? A systematic realist review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: What works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? A systematic realist review protocol
title_short Understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: What works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? A systematic realist review protocol
title_sort understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: what works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? a systematic realist review protocol
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8385521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34180455
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/WOR-213515
work_keys_str_mv AT vanheessuzannegm understandingworkparticipationamongemployeeswithcommonmentaldisorderswhatworksforwhomunderwhatcircumstancesandhowasystematicrealistreviewprotocol
AT carlierbouwinee understandingworkparticipationamongemployeeswithcommonmentaldisorderswhatworksforwhomunderwhatcircumstancesandhowasystematicrealistreviewprotocol
AT blonkrolandwb understandingworkparticipationamongemployeeswithcommonmentaldisorderswhatworksforwhomunderwhatcircumstancesandhowasystematicrealistreviewprotocol
AT oomensshirley understandingworkparticipationamongemployeeswithcommonmentaldisorderswhatworksforwhomunderwhatcircumstancesandhowasystematicrealistreviewprotocol