Cargando…

The Implications of Changing Age and Weight at Slaughter of Heavy Pigs on Carcass and Green Ham Quality Traits

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Conventional rearing systems for heavy pigs intended for Italian dry-cured ham production require pigs to be slaughtered at 160 ± 16 kg and a minimum age of 9 months. With the current animal genetic trends providing progressively leaner animals, the conventional rearing system fails...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malgwi, Isaac Hyeladi, Gallo, Luigi, Halas, Veronika, Bonfatti, Valentina, Carcò, Giuseppe, Sasso, Celio Paolo, Carnier, Paolo, Schiavon, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8388713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34438904
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11082447
_version_ 1783742699876122624
author Malgwi, Isaac Hyeladi
Gallo, Luigi
Halas, Veronika
Bonfatti, Valentina
Carcò, Giuseppe
Sasso, Celio Paolo
Carnier, Paolo
Schiavon, Stefano
author_facet Malgwi, Isaac Hyeladi
Gallo, Luigi
Halas, Veronika
Bonfatti, Valentina
Carcò, Giuseppe
Sasso, Celio Paolo
Carnier, Paolo
Schiavon, Stefano
author_sort Malgwi, Isaac Hyeladi
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Conventional rearing systems for heavy pigs intended for Italian dry-cured ham production require pigs to be slaughtered at 160 ± 16 kg and a minimum age of 9 months. With the current animal genetic trends providing progressively leaner animals, the conventional rearing system fails to provide pigs with optimal characteristics for the dry-cured ham industry. In this research, new combinations of age and weight at slaughter were explored, using different feeding conditions, as possible alternative rearing strategies for heavy pigs. Such alternative rearing strategies aimed to manipulate the growth rate of pigs, first allowing them to reach 160 ± 16 kg slaughter weight at a younger age; second, allowing pigs to maximize their slaughter weight at 9 months of age; and third, inducing slow growth in the pigs to reach the 160 ± 16 kg body weight at an older age. The first two strategies were the most promising alternatives as they improved the rate of gain, feed efficiency, and ham adiposity of the pigs. While the first strategy was the most economically convenient, the second produced the hams with the highest quality. ABSTRACT: Italian dry-cured ham production requires pigs to be slaughtered at 160 ± 16 kg at 9 months of age (control, C). The study explored three alternatives, based on different feeding conditions: (1) allowing pigs to express their growth potential by letting them reach 160 ± 16 kg slaughter weight (SW) at younger slaughter age (SA) (younger Age, YA); (2) allowing pigs to express their growth potential by maximizing their SW at 9 months SA (greater weight, GW); (3) increasing the SA required to reach 160 ± 16 kg SW (older age, OA). Pigs (336 C21 Goland, 95 kg initial body weight) were slaughtered on average at 257, 230, 257, and 273 d SA and 172.7, 172.3, 192.9, and 169.3 SW kg for the four treatments, respectively. C pigs had an average daily gain (ADG) of 715 g/d and feed efficiency (FE) of 0.265 (gain to feed). Compared to C, YA pigs had higher ADG (+32%), FE (+7.5%), and better ham adiposity; GW pigs had higher carcass weight (+12%), ADG (+25%), trimmed ham weight (+10.9%), and better ham adiposity. OA treatment affected ADG (−16.4%), FE (−16.6%), and trimmed ham weight (−3.6%). YA and GW could be promising alternatives to C as they improved FE and ham quality traits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8388713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83887132021-08-27 The Implications of Changing Age and Weight at Slaughter of Heavy Pigs on Carcass and Green Ham Quality Traits Malgwi, Isaac Hyeladi Gallo, Luigi Halas, Veronika Bonfatti, Valentina Carcò, Giuseppe Sasso, Celio Paolo Carnier, Paolo Schiavon, Stefano Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Conventional rearing systems for heavy pigs intended for Italian dry-cured ham production require pigs to be slaughtered at 160 ± 16 kg and a minimum age of 9 months. With the current animal genetic trends providing progressively leaner animals, the conventional rearing system fails to provide pigs with optimal characteristics for the dry-cured ham industry. In this research, new combinations of age and weight at slaughter were explored, using different feeding conditions, as possible alternative rearing strategies for heavy pigs. Such alternative rearing strategies aimed to manipulate the growth rate of pigs, first allowing them to reach 160 ± 16 kg slaughter weight at a younger age; second, allowing pigs to maximize their slaughter weight at 9 months of age; and third, inducing slow growth in the pigs to reach the 160 ± 16 kg body weight at an older age. The first two strategies were the most promising alternatives as they improved the rate of gain, feed efficiency, and ham adiposity of the pigs. While the first strategy was the most economically convenient, the second produced the hams with the highest quality. ABSTRACT: Italian dry-cured ham production requires pigs to be slaughtered at 160 ± 16 kg at 9 months of age (control, C). The study explored three alternatives, based on different feeding conditions: (1) allowing pigs to express their growth potential by letting them reach 160 ± 16 kg slaughter weight (SW) at younger slaughter age (SA) (younger Age, YA); (2) allowing pigs to express their growth potential by maximizing their SW at 9 months SA (greater weight, GW); (3) increasing the SA required to reach 160 ± 16 kg SW (older age, OA). Pigs (336 C21 Goland, 95 kg initial body weight) were slaughtered on average at 257, 230, 257, and 273 d SA and 172.7, 172.3, 192.9, and 169.3 SW kg for the four treatments, respectively. C pigs had an average daily gain (ADG) of 715 g/d and feed efficiency (FE) of 0.265 (gain to feed). Compared to C, YA pigs had higher ADG (+32%), FE (+7.5%), and better ham adiposity; GW pigs had higher carcass weight (+12%), ADG (+25%), trimmed ham weight (+10.9%), and better ham adiposity. OA treatment affected ADG (−16.4%), FE (−16.6%), and trimmed ham weight (−3.6%). YA and GW could be promising alternatives to C as they improved FE and ham quality traits. MDPI 2021-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8388713/ /pubmed/34438904 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11082447 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Malgwi, Isaac Hyeladi
Gallo, Luigi
Halas, Veronika
Bonfatti, Valentina
Carcò, Giuseppe
Sasso, Celio Paolo
Carnier, Paolo
Schiavon, Stefano
The Implications of Changing Age and Weight at Slaughter of Heavy Pigs on Carcass and Green Ham Quality Traits
title The Implications of Changing Age and Weight at Slaughter of Heavy Pigs on Carcass and Green Ham Quality Traits
title_full The Implications of Changing Age and Weight at Slaughter of Heavy Pigs on Carcass and Green Ham Quality Traits
title_fullStr The Implications of Changing Age and Weight at Slaughter of Heavy Pigs on Carcass and Green Ham Quality Traits
title_full_unstemmed The Implications of Changing Age and Weight at Slaughter of Heavy Pigs on Carcass and Green Ham Quality Traits
title_short The Implications of Changing Age and Weight at Slaughter of Heavy Pigs on Carcass and Green Ham Quality Traits
title_sort implications of changing age and weight at slaughter of heavy pigs on carcass and green ham quality traits
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8388713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34438904
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11082447
work_keys_str_mv AT malgwiisaachyeladi theimplicationsofchangingageandweightatslaughterofheavypigsoncarcassandgreenhamqualitytraits
AT galloluigi theimplicationsofchangingageandweightatslaughterofheavypigsoncarcassandgreenhamqualitytraits
AT halasveronika theimplicationsofchangingageandweightatslaughterofheavypigsoncarcassandgreenhamqualitytraits
AT bonfattivalentina theimplicationsofchangingageandweightatslaughterofheavypigsoncarcassandgreenhamqualitytraits
AT carcogiuseppe theimplicationsofchangingageandweightatslaughterofheavypigsoncarcassandgreenhamqualitytraits
AT sassoceliopaolo theimplicationsofchangingageandweightatslaughterofheavypigsoncarcassandgreenhamqualitytraits
AT carnierpaolo theimplicationsofchangingageandweightatslaughterofheavypigsoncarcassandgreenhamqualitytraits
AT schiavonstefano theimplicationsofchangingageandweightatslaughterofheavypigsoncarcassandgreenhamqualitytraits
AT malgwiisaachyeladi implicationsofchangingageandweightatslaughterofheavypigsoncarcassandgreenhamqualitytraits
AT galloluigi implicationsofchangingageandweightatslaughterofheavypigsoncarcassandgreenhamqualitytraits
AT halasveronika implicationsofchangingageandweightatslaughterofheavypigsoncarcassandgreenhamqualitytraits
AT bonfattivalentina implicationsofchangingageandweightatslaughterofheavypigsoncarcassandgreenhamqualitytraits
AT carcogiuseppe implicationsofchangingageandweightatslaughterofheavypigsoncarcassandgreenhamqualitytraits
AT sassoceliopaolo implicationsofchangingageandweightatslaughterofheavypigsoncarcassandgreenhamqualitytraits
AT carnierpaolo implicationsofchangingageandweightatslaughterofheavypigsoncarcassandgreenhamqualitytraits
AT schiavonstefano implicationsofchangingageandweightatslaughterofheavypigsoncarcassandgreenhamqualitytraits