Cargando…

CCNE1 amplification among metastatic sites in patients with gynecologic high-grade serous carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the variability of CCNE1 amplification among metastatic sites of CCNE1 amplified high grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) cases to investigate the feasibility of targeting this alteration for therapeutic purposes. METHODS: Patients with CCNE1 amplified HGSC who underwe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Margolis, Benjamin, Dao, Fanny, Licciardi, Michael, Misirlioglu, Selim, Olvera, Narciso, Ramaswami, Sitharam, Levine, Douglas A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8391017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34485660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100850
_version_ 1783743180294848512
author Margolis, Benjamin
Dao, Fanny
Licciardi, Michael
Misirlioglu, Selim
Olvera, Narciso
Ramaswami, Sitharam
Levine, Douglas A.
author_facet Margolis, Benjamin
Dao, Fanny
Licciardi, Michael
Misirlioglu, Selim
Olvera, Narciso
Ramaswami, Sitharam
Levine, Douglas A.
author_sort Margolis, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the variability of CCNE1 amplification among metastatic sites of CCNE1 amplified high grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) cases to investigate the feasibility of targeting this alteration for therapeutic purposes. METHODS: Patients with CCNE1 amplified HGSC who underwent surgical cytoreduction with metastatic sites were identified from institutional molecular profiling reports and a population of HGSC cases screened using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). Cases with normal CCNE1 copy number were included as controls. Slides from metastatic sites were cut from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks, dissected for tumor of > 50% purity, and underwent DNA extraction. CCNE1 copy number was determined by ddPCR. Tumor purity was confirmed with mutant TP53 allele fraction from targeted massively parallel sequencing. RESULTS: Four of 15 patients from an institutional database screened by ddPCR were found to have CCNE1 amplification. Three additional patients were identified from a query of institutional commercial clinical reports. Among these 7 CCNE1 amplified cases (2 uterine, 5 ovarian), 5 showed preservation of CCNE1 amplification (copy number > 5) among all metastatic sites. The remaining 2 cases had multiple metastatic sites without preserved CCNE1 amplification. Non-amplified cases had predominantly normal CCNE1 copy number across metastatic sites. CONCLUSIONS: CCNE1 amplification is an early genomic event in HGSC and is preserved in most metastatic sites suggesting a uniform response to pathway targeting therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8391017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83910172021-09-02 CCNE1 amplification among metastatic sites in patients with gynecologic high-grade serous carcinoma Margolis, Benjamin Dao, Fanny Licciardi, Michael Misirlioglu, Selim Olvera, Narciso Ramaswami, Sitharam Levine, Douglas A. Gynecol Oncol Rep Research Report OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the variability of CCNE1 amplification among metastatic sites of CCNE1 amplified high grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) cases to investigate the feasibility of targeting this alteration for therapeutic purposes. METHODS: Patients with CCNE1 amplified HGSC who underwent surgical cytoreduction with metastatic sites were identified from institutional molecular profiling reports and a population of HGSC cases screened using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). Cases with normal CCNE1 copy number were included as controls. Slides from metastatic sites were cut from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks, dissected for tumor of > 50% purity, and underwent DNA extraction. CCNE1 copy number was determined by ddPCR. Tumor purity was confirmed with mutant TP53 allele fraction from targeted massively parallel sequencing. RESULTS: Four of 15 patients from an institutional database screened by ddPCR were found to have CCNE1 amplification. Three additional patients were identified from a query of institutional commercial clinical reports. Among these 7 CCNE1 amplified cases (2 uterine, 5 ovarian), 5 showed preservation of CCNE1 amplification (copy number > 5) among all metastatic sites. The remaining 2 cases had multiple metastatic sites without preserved CCNE1 amplification. Non-amplified cases had predominantly normal CCNE1 copy number across metastatic sites. CONCLUSIONS: CCNE1 amplification is an early genomic event in HGSC and is preserved in most metastatic sites suggesting a uniform response to pathway targeting therapies. Elsevier 2021-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8391017/ /pubmed/34485660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100850 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Report
Margolis, Benjamin
Dao, Fanny
Licciardi, Michael
Misirlioglu, Selim
Olvera, Narciso
Ramaswami, Sitharam
Levine, Douglas A.
CCNE1 amplification among metastatic sites in patients with gynecologic high-grade serous carcinoma
title CCNE1 amplification among metastatic sites in patients with gynecologic high-grade serous carcinoma
title_full CCNE1 amplification among metastatic sites in patients with gynecologic high-grade serous carcinoma
title_fullStr CCNE1 amplification among metastatic sites in patients with gynecologic high-grade serous carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed CCNE1 amplification among metastatic sites in patients with gynecologic high-grade serous carcinoma
title_short CCNE1 amplification among metastatic sites in patients with gynecologic high-grade serous carcinoma
title_sort ccne1 amplification among metastatic sites in patients with gynecologic high-grade serous carcinoma
topic Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8391017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34485660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100850
work_keys_str_mv AT margolisbenjamin ccne1amplificationamongmetastaticsitesinpatientswithgynecologichighgradeserouscarcinoma
AT daofanny ccne1amplificationamongmetastaticsitesinpatientswithgynecologichighgradeserouscarcinoma
AT licciardimichael ccne1amplificationamongmetastaticsitesinpatientswithgynecologichighgradeserouscarcinoma
AT misirliogluselim ccne1amplificationamongmetastaticsitesinpatientswithgynecologichighgradeserouscarcinoma
AT olveranarciso ccne1amplificationamongmetastaticsitesinpatientswithgynecologichighgradeserouscarcinoma
AT ramaswamisitharam ccne1amplificationamongmetastaticsitesinpatientswithgynecologichighgradeserouscarcinoma
AT levinedouglasa ccne1amplificationamongmetastaticsitesinpatientswithgynecologichighgradeserouscarcinoma