Cargando…
Comparison of Aerobic Capacity Changes as a Result of a Polarized or Block Training Program among Trained Mountain Bike Cyclists
This study compared the effectiveness of a block training program and a polarized training program in developing aerobic capacity in twenty trained mountain bike cyclists. The cyclists were divided into two groups: the block training program group (BT) and the polarized training program group (PT)....
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8393863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34444612 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168865 |
_version_ | 1783743820845809664 |
---|---|
author | Hebisz, Paulina Hebisz, Rafał Drelak, Maja |
author_facet | Hebisz, Paulina Hebisz, Rafał Drelak, Maja |
author_sort | Hebisz, Paulina |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study compared the effectiveness of a block training program and a polarized training program in developing aerobic capacity in twenty trained mountain bike cyclists. The cyclists were divided into two groups: the block training program group (BT) and the polarized training program group (PT). The experiment lasted 8 weeks. During the experiment, the BT group alternated between 17-day blocks consisting of dominant low-intensity training (LIT) and 11-day blocks consisting of sprint interval training (SIT), and high-intensity interval training (HIIT), while the PT group performed SIT, HIIT, and LIT simultaneously. Before and after the experiment, the cyclists performed incremental tests during which maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max), maximal aerobic power (Pmax), power achieved at the first ventilatory threshold (P(VT1)), and at the second ventilatory threshold (P(VT2)) were measured. VO(2)max increased in BT group (from 3.75 ± 0.67 to 4.00 ± 0.75 L∙min(−1)) and PT group (from 3.66 ± 0.73 to 4.20 ± 0.89 L∙min(−1)). In addition, Pmax, P(VT1), and P(VT2) increased in both groups to a similar extent. In conclusion, the polarized training program was more effective in developing the VO(2)max compared to the block program. In terms of developing other parameters characterizing the cyclists’ aerobic capacity, the block and polarized program induced similar results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8393863 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83938632021-08-28 Comparison of Aerobic Capacity Changes as a Result of a Polarized or Block Training Program among Trained Mountain Bike Cyclists Hebisz, Paulina Hebisz, Rafał Drelak, Maja Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This study compared the effectiveness of a block training program and a polarized training program in developing aerobic capacity in twenty trained mountain bike cyclists. The cyclists were divided into two groups: the block training program group (BT) and the polarized training program group (PT). The experiment lasted 8 weeks. During the experiment, the BT group alternated between 17-day blocks consisting of dominant low-intensity training (LIT) and 11-day blocks consisting of sprint interval training (SIT), and high-intensity interval training (HIIT), while the PT group performed SIT, HIIT, and LIT simultaneously. Before and after the experiment, the cyclists performed incremental tests during which maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max), maximal aerobic power (Pmax), power achieved at the first ventilatory threshold (P(VT1)), and at the second ventilatory threshold (P(VT2)) were measured. VO(2)max increased in BT group (from 3.75 ± 0.67 to 4.00 ± 0.75 L∙min(−1)) and PT group (from 3.66 ± 0.73 to 4.20 ± 0.89 L∙min(−1)). In addition, Pmax, P(VT1), and P(VT2) increased in both groups to a similar extent. In conclusion, the polarized training program was more effective in developing the VO(2)max compared to the block program. In terms of developing other parameters characterizing the cyclists’ aerobic capacity, the block and polarized program induced similar results. MDPI 2021-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8393863/ /pubmed/34444612 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168865 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hebisz, Paulina Hebisz, Rafał Drelak, Maja Comparison of Aerobic Capacity Changes as a Result of a Polarized or Block Training Program among Trained Mountain Bike Cyclists |
title | Comparison of Aerobic Capacity Changes as a Result of a Polarized or Block Training Program among Trained Mountain Bike Cyclists |
title_full | Comparison of Aerobic Capacity Changes as a Result of a Polarized or Block Training Program among Trained Mountain Bike Cyclists |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Aerobic Capacity Changes as a Result of a Polarized or Block Training Program among Trained Mountain Bike Cyclists |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Aerobic Capacity Changes as a Result of a Polarized or Block Training Program among Trained Mountain Bike Cyclists |
title_short | Comparison of Aerobic Capacity Changes as a Result of a Polarized or Block Training Program among Trained Mountain Bike Cyclists |
title_sort | comparison of aerobic capacity changes as a result of a polarized or block training program among trained mountain bike cyclists |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8393863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34444612 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168865 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hebiszpaulina comparisonofaerobiccapacitychangesasaresultofapolarizedorblocktrainingprogramamongtrainedmountainbikecyclists AT hebiszrafał comparisonofaerobiccapacitychangesasaresultofapolarizedorblocktrainingprogramamongtrainedmountainbikecyclists AT drelakmaja comparisonofaerobiccapacitychangesasaresultofapolarizedorblocktrainingprogramamongtrainedmountainbikecyclists |