Cargando…
Impact of Packaging Film and Beef Trimmings on Ground Beef Shelf Life
Fresh beef storage in the retail setting can be presented in a variety of packaging methods, and identifying an alternative such as vacuum packaging to current traditional methods could potentially increase shelf life and reduce meat waste. The objective of this study was to identify the influence o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441700 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10081923 |
_version_ | 1783743897731596288 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Hunter R. Wilborn, Barney S. Parnell, Anna Grace Reyes, Tristan M. Wagoner, Madison P. Yoder, Laura E. Blythe, Eugene Mulvaney, Don R. Rodning, Soren P. Mullenix, Mary K. Bonner, Tom Sawyer, Jason T. |
author_facet | Smith, Hunter R. Wilborn, Barney S. Parnell, Anna Grace Reyes, Tristan M. Wagoner, Madison P. Yoder, Laura E. Blythe, Eugene Mulvaney, Don R. Rodning, Soren P. Mullenix, Mary K. Bonner, Tom Sawyer, Jason T. |
author_sort | Smith, Hunter R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fresh beef storage in the retail setting can be presented in a variety of packaging methods, and identifying an alternative such as vacuum packaging to current traditional methods could potentially increase shelf life and reduce meat waste. The objective of this study was to identify the influence of packaging film and lean trimming sources on fresh ground beef surface color during a simulated retail display period. There were no differences (p > 0.05) in surface color redness (a*), yellowness (b*), chroma, or hue angle regardless of packaging film or lean trimmings. However, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) were greater (p < 0.05) for packages containing a greater percentage of CULL beef trimmings regardless of packaging film. In addition, pH values of ground beef packages did not differ (p > 0.05) among packaging film or lean trimming blends. Visual color did not differ (p > 0.05) throughout the simulated retail display period regardless of beef trimmings or packaging film. Microbial spoilage organisms were greater (p < 0.05) after the simulated display period. These results suggest that ground beef presented in a simulated retail setting using an alternative packaging platform, such as vacuum packaging, is plausible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8394221 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83942212021-08-28 Impact of Packaging Film and Beef Trimmings on Ground Beef Shelf Life Smith, Hunter R. Wilborn, Barney S. Parnell, Anna Grace Reyes, Tristan M. Wagoner, Madison P. Yoder, Laura E. Blythe, Eugene Mulvaney, Don R. Rodning, Soren P. Mullenix, Mary K. Bonner, Tom Sawyer, Jason T. Foods Article Fresh beef storage in the retail setting can be presented in a variety of packaging methods, and identifying an alternative such as vacuum packaging to current traditional methods could potentially increase shelf life and reduce meat waste. The objective of this study was to identify the influence of packaging film and lean trimming sources on fresh ground beef surface color during a simulated retail display period. There were no differences (p > 0.05) in surface color redness (a*), yellowness (b*), chroma, or hue angle regardless of packaging film or lean trimmings. However, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) were greater (p < 0.05) for packages containing a greater percentage of CULL beef trimmings regardless of packaging film. In addition, pH values of ground beef packages did not differ (p > 0.05) among packaging film or lean trimming blends. Visual color did not differ (p > 0.05) throughout the simulated retail display period regardless of beef trimmings or packaging film. Microbial spoilage organisms were greater (p < 0.05) after the simulated display period. These results suggest that ground beef presented in a simulated retail setting using an alternative packaging platform, such as vacuum packaging, is plausible. MDPI 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8394221/ /pubmed/34441700 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10081923 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Smith, Hunter R. Wilborn, Barney S. Parnell, Anna Grace Reyes, Tristan M. Wagoner, Madison P. Yoder, Laura E. Blythe, Eugene Mulvaney, Don R. Rodning, Soren P. Mullenix, Mary K. Bonner, Tom Sawyer, Jason T. Impact of Packaging Film and Beef Trimmings on Ground Beef Shelf Life |
title | Impact of Packaging Film and Beef Trimmings on Ground Beef Shelf Life |
title_full | Impact of Packaging Film and Beef Trimmings on Ground Beef Shelf Life |
title_fullStr | Impact of Packaging Film and Beef Trimmings on Ground Beef Shelf Life |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Packaging Film and Beef Trimmings on Ground Beef Shelf Life |
title_short | Impact of Packaging Film and Beef Trimmings on Ground Beef Shelf Life |
title_sort | impact of packaging film and beef trimmings on ground beef shelf life |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441700 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10081923 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithhunterr impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife AT wilbornbarneys impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife AT parnellannagrace impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife AT reyestristanm impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife AT wagonermadisonp impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife AT yoderlaurae impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife AT blytheeugene impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife AT mulvaneydonr impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife AT rodningsorenp impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife AT mullenixmaryk impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife AT bonnertom impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife AT sawyerjasont impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife |