Cargando…

Impact of Packaging Film and Beef Trimmings on Ground Beef Shelf Life

Fresh beef storage in the retail setting can be presented in a variety of packaging methods, and identifying an alternative such as vacuum packaging to current traditional methods could potentially increase shelf life and reduce meat waste. The objective of this study was to identify the influence o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Hunter R., Wilborn, Barney S., Parnell, Anna Grace, Reyes, Tristan M., Wagoner, Madison P., Yoder, Laura E., Blythe, Eugene, Mulvaney, Don R., Rodning, Soren P., Mullenix, Mary K., Bonner, Tom, Sawyer, Jason T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441700
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10081923
_version_ 1783743897731596288
author Smith, Hunter R.
Wilborn, Barney S.
Parnell, Anna Grace
Reyes, Tristan M.
Wagoner, Madison P.
Yoder, Laura E.
Blythe, Eugene
Mulvaney, Don R.
Rodning, Soren P.
Mullenix, Mary K.
Bonner, Tom
Sawyer, Jason T.
author_facet Smith, Hunter R.
Wilborn, Barney S.
Parnell, Anna Grace
Reyes, Tristan M.
Wagoner, Madison P.
Yoder, Laura E.
Blythe, Eugene
Mulvaney, Don R.
Rodning, Soren P.
Mullenix, Mary K.
Bonner, Tom
Sawyer, Jason T.
author_sort Smith, Hunter R.
collection PubMed
description Fresh beef storage in the retail setting can be presented in a variety of packaging methods, and identifying an alternative such as vacuum packaging to current traditional methods could potentially increase shelf life and reduce meat waste. The objective of this study was to identify the influence of packaging film and lean trimming sources on fresh ground beef surface color during a simulated retail display period. There were no differences (p > 0.05) in surface color redness (a*), yellowness (b*), chroma, or hue angle regardless of packaging film or lean trimmings. However, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) were greater (p < 0.05) for packages containing a greater percentage of CULL beef trimmings regardless of packaging film. In addition, pH values of ground beef packages did not differ (p > 0.05) among packaging film or lean trimming blends. Visual color did not differ (p > 0.05) throughout the simulated retail display period regardless of beef trimmings or packaging film. Microbial spoilage organisms were greater (p < 0.05) after the simulated display period. These results suggest that ground beef presented in a simulated retail setting using an alternative packaging platform, such as vacuum packaging, is plausible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8394221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83942212021-08-28 Impact of Packaging Film and Beef Trimmings on Ground Beef Shelf Life Smith, Hunter R. Wilborn, Barney S. Parnell, Anna Grace Reyes, Tristan M. Wagoner, Madison P. Yoder, Laura E. Blythe, Eugene Mulvaney, Don R. Rodning, Soren P. Mullenix, Mary K. Bonner, Tom Sawyer, Jason T. Foods Article Fresh beef storage in the retail setting can be presented in a variety of packaging methods, and identifying an alternative such as vacuum packaging to current traditional methods could potentially increase shelf life and reduce meat waste. The objective of this study was to identify the influence of packaging film and lean trimming sources on fresh ground beef surface color during a simulated retail display period. There were no differences (p > 0.05) in surface color redness (a*), yellowness (b*), chroma, or hue angle regardless of packaging film or lean trimmings. However, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) were greater (p < 0.05) for packages containing a greater percentage of CULL beef trimmings regardless of packaging film. In addition, pH values of ground beef packages did not differ (p > 0.05) among packaging film or lean trimming blends. Visual color did not differ (p > 0.05) throughout the simulated retail display period regardless of beef trimmings or packaging film. Microbial spoilage organisms were greater (p < 0.05) after the simulated display period. These results suggest that ground beef presented in a simulated retail setting using an alternative packaging platform, such as vacuum packaging, is plausible. MDPI 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8394221/ /pubmed/34441700 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10081923 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Smith, Hunter R.
Wilborn, Barney S.
Parnell, Anna Grace
Reyes, Tristan M.
Wagoner, Madison P.
Yoder, Laura E.
Blythe, Eugene
Mulvaney, Don R.
Rodning, Soren P.
Mullenix, Mary K.
Bonner, Tom
Sawyer, Jason T.
Impact of Packaging Film and Beef Trimmings on Ground Beef Shelf Life
title Impact of Packaging Film and Beef Trimmings on Ground Beef Shelf Life
title_full Impact of Packaging Film and Beef Trimmings on Ground Beef Shelf Life
title_fullStr Impact of Packaging Film and Beef Trimmings on Ground Beef Shelf Life
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Packaging Film and Beef Trimmings on Ground Beef Shelf Life
title_short Impact of Packaging Film and Beef Trimmings on Ground Beef Shelf Life
title_sort impact of packaging film and beef trimmings on ground beef shelf life
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441700
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10081923
work_keys_str_mv AT smithhunterr impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife
AT wilbornbarneys impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife
AT parnellannagrace impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife
AT reyestristanm impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife
AT wagonermadisonp impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife
AT yoderlaurae impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife
AT blytheeugene impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife
AT mulvaneydonr impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife
AT rodningsorenp impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife
AT mullenixmaryk impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife
AT bonnertom impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife
AT sawyerjasont impactofpackagingfilmandbeeftrimmingsongroundbeefshelflife