Cargando…

Membrane Association Modes of Natural Anticancer Peptides: Mechanistic Details on Helicity, Orientation, and Surface Coverage

Anticancer peptides (ACPs) could potentially offer many advantages over other cancer therapies. ACPs often target cell membranes, where their surface mechanism is coupled to a conformational change into helical structures. However, details on their binding are still unclear, which would be crucial t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quemé-Peña, Mayra, Juhász, Tünde, Kohut, Gergely, Ricci, Maria, Singh, Priyanka, Szigyártó, Imola Cs., Papp, Zita I., Fülöp, Lívia, Beke-Somfai, Tamás
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8395313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34445319
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168613
_version_ 1783744144292708352
author Quemé-Peña, Mayra
Juhász, Tünde
Kohut, Gergely
Ricci, Maria
Singh, Priyanka
Szigyártó, Imola Cs.
Papp, Zita I.
Fülöp, Lívia
Beke-Somfai, Tamás
author_facet Quemé-Peña, Mayra
Juhász, Tünde
Kohut, Gergely
Ricci, Maria
Singh, Priyanka
Szigyártó, Imola Cs.
Papp, Zita I.
Fülöp, Lívia
Beke-Somfai, Tamás
author_sort Quemé-Peña, Mayra
collection PubMed
description Anticancer peptides (ACPs) could potentially offer many advantages over other cancer therapies. ACPs often target cell membranes, where their surface mechanism is coupled to a conformational change into helical structures. However, details on their binding are still unclear, which would be crucial to reach progress in connecting structural aspects to ACP action and to therapeutic developments. Here we investigated natural helical ACPs, Lasioglossin LL-III, Macropin 1, Temporin-La, FK-16, and LL-37, on model liposomes, and also on extracellular vesicles (EVs), with an outer leaflet composition similar to cancer cells. The combined simulations and experiments identified three distinct binding modes to the membranes. Firstly, a highly helical structure, lying mainly on the membrane surface; secondly, a similar, yet only partially helical structure with disordered regions; and thirdly, a helical monomeric form with a non-inserted perpendicular orientation relative to the membrane surface. The latter allows large swings of the helix while the N-terminal is anchored to the headgroup region. These results indicate that subtle differences in sequence and charge can result in altered binding modes. The first two modes could be part of the well-known carpet model mechanism, whereas the newly identified third mode could be an intermediate state, existing prior to membrane insertion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8395313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83953132021-08-28 Membrane Association Modes of Natural Anticancer Peptides: Mechanistic Details on Helicity, Orientation, and Surface Coverage Quemé-Peña, Mayra Juhász, Tünde Kohut, Gergely Ricci, Maria Singh, Priyanka Szigyártó, Imola Cs. Papp, Zita I. Fülöp, Lívia Beke-Somfai, Tamás Int J Mol Sci Article Anticancer peptides (ACPs) could potentially offer many advantages over other cancer therapies. ACPs often target cell membranes, where their surface mechanism is coupled to a conformational change into helical structures. However, details on their binding are still unclear, which would be crucial to reach progress in connecting structural aspects to ACP action and to therapeutic developments. Here we investigated natural helical ACPs, Lasioglossin LL-III, Macropin 1, Temporin-La, FK-16, and LL-37, on model liposomes, and also on extracellular vesicles (EVs), with an outer leaflet composition similar to cancer cells. The combined simulations and experiments identified three distinct binding modes to the membranes. Firstly, a highly helical structure, lying mainly on the membrane surface; secondly, a similar, yet only partially helical structure with disordered regions; and thirdly, a helical monomeric form with a non-inserted perpendicular orientation relative to the membrane surface. The latter allows large swings of the helix while the N-terminal is anchored to the headgroup region. These results indicate that subtle differences in sequence and charge can result in altered binding modes. The first two modes could be part of the well-known carpet model mechanism, whereas the newly identified third mode could be an intermediate state, existing prior to membrane insertion. MDPI 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8395313/ /pubmed/34445319 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168613 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Quemé-Peña, Mayra
Juhász, Tünde
Kohut, Gergely
Ricci, Maria
Singh, Priyanka
Szigyártó, Imola Cs.
Papp, Zita I.
Fülöp, Lívia
Beke-Somfai, Tamás
Membrane Association Modes of Natural Anticancer Peptides: Mechanistic Details on Helicity, Orientation, and Surface Coverage
title Membrane Association Modes of Natural Anticancer Peptides: Mechanistic Details on Helicity, Orientation, and Surface Coverage
title_full Membrane Association Modes of Natural Anticancer Peptides: Mechanistic Details on Helicity, Orientation, and Surface Coverage
title_fullStr Membrane Association Modes of Natural Anticancer Peptides: Mechanistic Details on Helicity, Orientation, and Surface Coverage
title_full_unstemmed Membrane Association Modes of Natural Anticancer Peptides: Mechanistic Details on Helicity, Orientation, and Surface Coverage
title_short Membrane Association Modes of Natural Anticancer Peptides: Mechanistic Details on Helicity, Orientation, and Surface Coverage
title_sort membrane association modes of natural anticancer peptides: mechanistic details on helicity, orientation, and surface coverage
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8395313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34445319
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168613
work_keys_str_mv AT quemepenamayra membraneassociationmodesofnaturalanticancerpeptidesmechanisticdetailsonhelicityorientationandsurfacecoverage
AT juhasztunde membraneassociationmodesofnaturalanticancerpeptidesmechanisticdetailsonhelicityorientationandsurfacecoverage
AT kohutgergely membraneassociationmodesofnaturalanticancerpeptidesmechanisticdetailsonhelicityorientationandsurfacecoverage
AT riccimaria membraneassociationmodesofnaturalanticancerpeptidesmechanisticdetailsonhelicityorientationandsurfacecoverage
AT singhpriyanka membraneassociationmodesofnaturalanticancerpeptidesmechanisticdetailsonhelicityorientationandsurfacecoverage
AT szigyartoimolacs membraneassociationmodesofnaturalanticancerpeptidesmechanisticdetailsonhelicityorientationandsurfacecoverage
AT pappzitai membraneassociationmodesofnaturalanticancerpeptidesmechanisticdetailsonhelicityorientationandsurfacecoverage
AT fuloplivia membraneassociationmodesofnaturalanticancerpeptidesmechanisticdetailsonhelicityorientationandsurfacecoverage
AT bekesomfaitamas membraneassociationmodesofnaturalanticancerpeptidesmechanisticdetailsonhelicityorientationandsurfacecoverage