Cargando…
Membrane Association Modes of Natural Anticancer Peptides: Mechanistic Details on Helicity, Orientation, and Surface Coverage
Anticancer peptides (ACPs) could potentially offer many advantages over other cancer therapies. ACPs often target cell membranes, where their surface mechanism is coupled to a conformational change into helical structures. However, details on their binding are still unclear, which would be crucial t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8395313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34445319 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168613 |
_version_ | 1783744144292708352 |
---|---|
author | Quemé-Peña, Mayra Juhász, Tünde Kohut, Gergely Ricci, Maria Singh, Priyanka Szigyártó, Imola Cs. Papp, Zita I. Fülöp, Lívia Beke-Somfai, Tamás |
author_facet | Quemé-Peña, Mayra Juhász, Tünde Kohut, Gergely Ricci, Maria Singh, Priyanka Szigyártó, Imola Cs. Papp, Zita I. Fülöp, Lívia Beke-Somfai, Tamás |
author_sort | Quemé-Peña, Mayra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Anticancer peptides (ACPs) could potentially offer many advantages over other cancer therapies. ACPs often target cell membranes, where their surface mechanism is coupled to a conformational change into helical structures. However, details on their binding are still unclear, which would be crucial to reach progress in connecting structural aspects to ACP action and to therapeutic developments. Here we investigated natural helical ACPs, Lasioglossin LL-III, Macropin 1, Temporin-La, FK-16, and LL-37, on model liposomes, and also on extracellular vesicles (EVs), with an outer leaflet composition similar to cancer cells. The combined simulations and experiments identified three distinct binding modes to the membranes. Firstly, a highly helical structure, lying mainly on the membrane surface; secondly, a similar, yet only partially helical structure with disordered regions; and thirdly, a helical monomeric form with a non-inserted perpendicular orientation relative to the membrane surface. The latter allows large swings of the helix while the N-terminal is anchored to the headgroup region. These results indicate that subtle differences in sequence and charge can result in altered binding modes. The first two modes could be part of the well-known carpet model mechanism, whereas the newly identified third mode could be an intermediate state, existing prior to membrane insertion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8395313 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83953132021-08-28 Membrane Association Modes of Natural Anticancer Peptides: Mechanistic Details on Helicity, Orientation, and Surface Coverage Quemé-Peña, Mayra Juhász, Tünde Kohut, Gergely Ricci, Maria Singh, Priyanka Szigyártó, Imola Cs. Papp, Zita I. Fülöp, Lívia Beke-Somfai, Tamás Int J Mol Sci Article Anticancer peptides (ACPs) could potentially offer many advantages over other cancer therapies. ACPs often target cell membranes, where their surface mechanism is coupled to a conformational change into helical structures. However, details on their binding are still unclear, which would be crucial to reach progress in connecting structural aspects to ACP action and to therapeutic developments. Here we investigated natural helical ACPs, Lasioglossin LL-III, Macropin 1, Temporin-La, FK-16, and LL-37, on model liposomes, and also on extracellular vesicles (EVs), with an outer leaflet composition similar to cancer cells. The combined simulations and experiments identified three distinct binding modes to the membranes. Firstly, a highly helical structure, lying mainly on the membrane surface; secondly, a similar, yet only partially helical structure with disordered regions; and thirdly, a helical monomeric form with a non-inserted perpendicular orientation relative to the membrane surface. The latter allows large swings of the helix while the N-terminal is anchored to the headgroup region. These results indicate that subtle differences in sequence and charge can result in altered binding modes. The first two modes could be part of the well-known carpet model mechanism, whereas the newly identified third mode could be an intermediate state, existing prior to membrane insertion. MDPI 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8395313/ /pubmed/34445319 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168613 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Quemé-Peña, Mayra Juhász, Tünde Kohut, Gergely Ricci, Maria Singh, Priyanka Szigyártó, Imola Cs. Papp, Zita I. Fülöp, Lívia Beke-Somfai, Tamás Membrane Association Modes of Natural Anticancer Peptides: Mechanistic Details on Helicity, Orientation, and Surface Coverage |
title | Membrane Association Modes of Natural Anticancer Peptides: Mechanistic Details on Helicity, Orientation, and Surface Coverage |
title_full | Membrane Association Modes of Natural Anticancer Peptides: Mechanistic Details on Helicity, Orientation, and Surface Coverage |
title_fullStr | Membrane Association Modes of Natural Anticancer Peptides: Mechanistic Details on Helicity, Orientation, and Surface Coverage |
title_full_unstemmed | Membrane Association Modes of Natural Anticancer Peptides: Mechanistic Details on Helicity, Orientation, and Surface Coverage |
title_short | Membrane Association Modes of Natural Anticancer Peptides: Mechanistic Details on Helicity, Orientation, and Surface Coverage |
title_sort | membrane association modes of natural anticancer peptides: mechanistic details on helicity, orientation, and surface coverage |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8395313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34445319 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168613 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quemepenamayra membraneassociationmodesofnaturalanticancerpeptidesmechanisticdetailsonhelicityorientationandsurfacecoverage AT juhasztunde membraneassociationmodesofnaturalanticancerpeptidesmechanisticdetailsonhelicityorientationandsurfacecoverage AT kohutgergely membraneassociationmodesofnaturalanticancerpeptidesmechanisticdetailsonhelicityorientationandsurfacecoverage AT riccimaria membraneassociationmodesofnaturalanticancerpeptidesmechanisticdetailsonhelicityorientationandsurfacecoverage AT singhpriyanka membraneassociationmodesofnaturalanticancerpeptidesmechanisticdetailsonhelicityorientationandsurfacecoverage AT szigyartoimolacs membraneassociationmodesofnaturalanticancerpeptidesmechanisticdetailsonhelicityorientationandsurfacecoverage AT pappzitai membraneassociationmodesofnaturalanticancerpeptidesmechanisticdetailsonhelicityorientationandsurfacecoverage AT fuloplivia membraneassociationmodesofnaturalanticancerpeptidesmechanisticdetailsonhelicityorientationandsurfacecoverage AT bekesomfaitamas membraneassociationmodesofnaturalanticancerpeptidesmechanisticdetailsonhelicityorientationandsurfacecoverage |