Cargando…

Entropy–Entropy Compensation between the Protein, Ligand, and Solvent Degrees of Freedom Fine-Tunes Affinity in Ligand Binding to Galectin-3C

[Image: see text] Molecular recognition is fundamental to biological signaling. A central question is how individual interactions between molecular moieties affect the thermodynamics of ligand binding to proteins and how these effects might propagate beyond the immediate neighborhood of the binding...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wallerstein, Johan, Ekberg, Vilhelm, Ignjatović, Majda Misini, Kumar, Rohit, Caldararu, Octav, Peterson, Kristoffer, Wernersson, Sven, Brath, Ulrika, Leffler, Hakon, Oksanen, Esko, Logan, Derek T., Nilsson, Ulf J., Ryde, Ulf, Akke, Mikael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8395690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34467311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.0c00094
_version_ 1783744227855826944
author Wallerstein, Johan
Ekberg, Vilhelm
Ignjatović, Majda Misini
Kumar, Rohit
Caldararu, Octav
Peterson, Kristoffer
Wernersson, Sven
Brath, Ulrika
Leffler, Hakon
Oksanen, Esko
Logan, Derek T.
Nilsson, Ulf J.
Ryde, Ulf
Akke, Mikael
author_facet Wallerstein, Johan
Ekberg, Vilhelm
Ignjatović, Majda Misini
Kumar, Rohit
Caldararu, Octav
Peterson, Kristoffer
Wernersson, Sven
Brath, Ulrika
Leffler, Hakon
Oksanen, Esko
Logan, Derek T.
Nilsson, Ulf J.
Ryde, Ulf
Akke, Mikael
author_sort Wallerstein, Johan
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Molecular recognition is fundamental to biological signaling. A central question is how individual interactions between molecular moieties affect the thermodynamics of ligand binding to proteins and how these effects might propagate beyond the immediate neighborhood of the binding site. Here, we investigate this question by introducing minor changes in ligand structure and characterizing the effects of these on ligand affinity to the carbohydrate recognition domain of galectin-3, using a combination of isothermal titration calorimetry, X-ray crystallography, NMR relaxation, and computational approaches including molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and grid inhomogeneous solvation theory (GIST). We studied a congeneric series of ligands with a fluorophenyl-triazole moiety, where the fluorine substituent varies between the ortho, meta, and para positions (denoted O, M, and P). The M and P ligands have similar affinities, whereas the O ligand has 3-fold lower affinity, reflecting differences in binding enthalpy and entropy. The results reveal surprising differences in conformational and solvation entropy among the three complexes. NMR backbone order parameters show that the O-bound protein has reduced conformational entropy compared to the M and P complexes. By contrast, the bound ligand is more flexible in the O complex, as determined by (19)F NMR relaxation, ensemble-refined X-ray diffraction data, and MD simulations. Furthermore, GIST calculations indicate that the O-bound complex has less unfavorable solvation entropy compared to the other two complexes. Thus, the results indicate compensatory effects from ligand conformational entropy and water entropy, on the one hand, and protein conformational entropy, on the other hand. Taken together, these different contributions amount to entropy–entropy compensation among the system components involved in ligand binding to a target protein.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8395690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83956902021-08-30 Entropy–Entropy Compensation between the Protein, Ligand, and Solvent Degrees of Freedom Fine-Tunes Affinity in Ligand Binding to Galectin-3C Wallerstein, Johan Ekberg, Vilhelm Ignjatović, Majda Misini Kumar, Rohit Caldararu, Octav Peterson, Kristoffer Wernersson, Sven Brath, Ulrika Leffler, Hakon Oksanen, Esko Logan, Derek T. Nilsson, Ulf J. Ryde, Ulf Akke, Mikael JACS Au [Image: see text] Molecular recognition is fundamental to biological signaling. A central question is how individual interactions between molecular moieties affect the thermodynamics of ligand binding to proteins and how these effects might propagate beyond the immediate neighborhood of the binding site. Here, we investigate this question by introducing minor changes in ligand structure and characterizing the effects of these on ligand affinity to the carbohydrate recognition domain of galectin-3, using a combination of isothermal titration calorimetry, X-ray crystallography, NMR relaxation, and computational approaches including molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and grid inhomogeneous solvation theory (GIST). We studied a congeneric series of ligands with a fluorophenyl-triazole moiety, where the fluorine substituent varies between the ortho, meta, and para positions (denoted O, M, and P). The M and P ligands have similar affinities, whereas the O ligand has 3-fold lower affinity, reflecting differences in binding enthalpy and entropy. The results reveal surprising differences in conformational and solvation entropy among the three complexes. NMR backbone order parameters show that the O-bound protein has reduced conformational entropy compared to the M and P complexes. By contrast, the bound ligand is more flexible in the O complex, as determined by (19)F NMR relaxation, ensemble-refined X-ray diffraction data, and MD simulations. Furthermore, GIST calculations indicate that the O-bound complex has less unfavorable solvation entropy compared to the other two complexes. Thus, the results indicate compensatory effects from ligand conformational entropy and water entropy, on the one hand, and protein conformational entropy, on the other hand. Taken together, these different contributions amount to entropy–entropy compensation among the system components involved in ligand binding to a target protein. American Chemical Society 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8395690/ /pubmed/34467311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.0c00094 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Wallerstein, Johan
Ekberg, Vilhelm
Ignjatović, Majda Misini
Kumar, Rohit
Caldararu, Octav
Peterson, Kristoffer
Wernersson, Sven
Brath, Ulrika
Leffler, Hakon
Oksanen, Esko
Logan, Derek T.
Nilsson, Ulf J.
Ryde, Ulf
Akke, Mikael
Entropy–Entropy Compensation between the Protein, Ligand, and Solvent Degrees of Freedom Fine-Tunes Affinity in Ligand Binding to Galectin-3C
title Entropy–Entropy Compensation between the Protein, Ligand, and Solvent Degrees of Freedom Fine-Tunes Affinity in Ligand Binding to Galectin-3C
title_full Entropy–Entropy Compensation between the Protein, Ligand, and Solvent Degrees of Freedom Fine-Tunes Affinity in Ligand Binding to Galectin-3C
title_fullStr Entropy–Entropy Compensation between the Protein, Ligand, and Solvent Degrees of Freedom Fine-Tunes Affinity in Ligand Binding to Galectin-3C
title_full_unstemmed Entropy–Entropy Compensation between the Protein, Ligand, and Solvent Degrees of Freedom Fine-Tunes Affinity in Ligand Binding to Galectin-3C
title_short Entropy–Entropy Compensation between the Protein, Ligand, and Solvent Degrees of Freedom Fine-Tunes Affinity in Ligand Binding to Galectin-3C
title_sort entropy–entropy compensation between the protein, ligand, and solvent degrees of freedom fine-tunes affinity in ligand binding to galectin-3c
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8395690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34467311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.0c00094
work_keys_str_mv AT wallersteinjohan entropyentropycompensationbetweentheproteinligandandsolventdegreesoffreedomfinetunesaffinityinligandbindingtogalectin3c
AT ekbergvilhelm entropyentropycompensationbetweentheproteinligandandsolventdegreesoffreedomfinetunesaffinityinligandbindingtogalectin3c
AT ignjatovicmajdamisini entropyentropycompensationbetweentheproteinligandandsolventdegreesoffreedomfinetunesaffinityinligandbindingtogalectin3c
AT kumarrohit entropyentropycompensationbetweentheproteinligandandsolventdegreesoffreedomfinetunesaffinityinligandbindingtogalectin3c
AT caldararuoctav entropyentropycompensationbetweentheproteinligandandsolventdegreesoffreedomfinetunesaffinityinligandbindingtogalectin3c
AT petersonkristoffer entropyentropycompensationbetweentheproteinligandandsolventdegreesoffreedomfinetunesaffinityinligandbindingtogalectin3c
AT wernerssonsven entropyentropycompensationbetweentheproteinligandandsolventdegreesoffreedomfinetunesaffinityinligandbindingtogalectin3c
AT brathulrika entropyentropycompensationbetweentheproteinligandandsolventdegreesoffreedomfinetunesaffinityinligandbindingtogalectin3c
AT lefflerhakon entropyentropycompensationbetweentheproteinligandandsolventdegreesoffreedomfinetunesaffinityinligandbindingtogalectin3c
AT oksanenesko entropyentropycompensationbetweentheproteinligandandsolventdegreesoffreedomfinetunesaffinityinligandbindingtogalectin3c
AT loganderekt entropyentropycompensationbetweentheproteinligandandsolventdegreesoffreedomfinetunesaffinityinligandbindingtogalectin3c
AT nilssonulfj entropyentropycompensationbetweentheproteinligandandsolventdegreesoffreedomfinetunesaffinityinligandbindingtogalectin3c
AT rydeulf entropyentropycompensationbetweentheproteinligandandsolventdegreesoffreedomfinetunesaffinityinligandbindingtogalectin3c
AT akkemikael entropyentropycompensationbetweentheproteinligandandsolventdegreesoffreedomfinetunesaffinityinligandbindingtogalectin3c