Cargando…

Sweat Chloride Testing and Nasal Potential Difference (NPD) Are Primary Outcome Parameters in Treatment with Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Modulators

With the advent of CFTR modulators, surrogate outcome parameters that accurately quantify the improvement in CFTR activity are needed. In vivo biomarkers that reflect CFTR ion transport and can serve as outcomes in the treatment of CFTR modulators are the sweat Cl(−) test (SCT), the nasal potential...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sermet-Gaudelus, Isabelle, Nguyen-Khoa, Thao, Hatton, Aurélie, Hayes, Kate, Pranke, Iwona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8398324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34442373
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080729
_version_ 1783744812085673984
author Sermet-Gaudelus, Isabelle
Nguyen-Khoa, Thao
Hatton, Aurélie
Hayes, Kate
Pranke, Iwona
author_facet Sermet-Gaudelus, Isabelle
Nguyen-Khoa, Thao
Hatton, Aurélie
Hayes, Kate
Pranke, Iwona
author_sort Sermet-Gaudelus, Isabelle
collection PubMed
description With the advent of CFTR modulators, surrogate outcome parameters that accurately quantify the improvement in CFTR activity are needed. In vivo biomarkers that reflect CFTR ion transport and can serve as outcomes in the treatment of CFTR modulators are the sweat Cl(−) test (SCT), the nasal potential difference (NPD) measurement or the intestinal current measurement (ICM). This review focus on the SCT and NPD. The SCT displays a low intra-patient variability in contrast to the NPD. It has been used extensively as a biomarker of CFTR function in clinical trials of CFTR modulator therapies and provides evidence for change in the short term. The level of functional rescue in the NPD increases up to 40% of normal CFTR in patients with a Gly551Asp treated with ivacaftor monotherapy, while in F508del homozygous patients treated with ivacaftor-lumacaftor, activity increased on average up to ~20% of normal activity. While both tests provide evidence of the effect on CFTR activity, they cannot be used at an individual level to predict the response to any CFTR modulators. Nevertheless, their rapid modification, reflecting electrophysiological properties, highlight their potential use in proof-of-concept studies for CFTR modulators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8398324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83983242021-08-29 Sweat Chloride Testing and Nasal Potential Difference (NPD) Are Primary Outcome Parameters in Treatment with Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Modulators Sermet-Gaudelus, Isabelle Nguyen-Khoa, Thao Hatton, Aurélie Hayes, Kate Pranke, Iwona J Pers Med Article With the advent of CFTR modulators, surrogate outcome parameters that accurately quantify the improvement in CFTR activity are needed. In vivo biomarkers that reflect CFTR ion transport and can serve as outcomes in the treatment of CFTR modulators are the sweat Cl(−) test (SCT), the nasal potential difference (NPD) measurement or the intestinal current measurement (ICM). This review focus on the SCT and NPD. The SCT displays a low intra-patient variability in contrast to the NPD. It has been used extensively as a biomarker of CFTR function in clinical trials of CFTR modulator therapies and provides evidence for change in the short term. The level of functional rescue in the NPD increases up to 40% of normal CFTR in patients with a Gly551Asp treated with ivacaftor monotherapy, while in F508del homozygous patients treated with ivacaftor-lumacaftor, activity increased on average up to ~20% of normal activity. While both tests provide evidence of the effect on CFTR activity, they cannot be used at an individual level to predict the response to any CFTR modulators. Nevertheless, their rapid modification, reflecting electrophysiological properties, highlight their potential use in proof-of-concept studies for CFTR modulators. MDPI 2021-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8398324/ /pubmed/34442373 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080729 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sermet-Gaudelus, Isabelle
Nguyen-Khoa, Thao
Hatton, Aurélie
Hayes, Kate
Pranke, Iwona
Sweat Chloride Testing and Nasal Potential Difference (NPD) Are Primary Outcome Parameters in Treatment with Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Modulators
title Sweat Chloride Testing and Nasal Potential Difference (NPD) Are Primary Outcome Parameters in Treatment with Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Modulators
title_full Sweat Chloride Testing and Nasal Potential Difference (NPD) Are Primary Outcome Parameters in Treatment with Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Modulators
title_fullStr Sweat Chloride Testing and Nasal Potential Difference (NPD) Are Primary Outcome Parameters in Treatment with Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Modulators
title_full_unstemmed Sweat Chloride Testing and Nasal Potential Difference (NPD) Are Primary Outcome Parameters in Treatment with Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Modulators
title_short Sweat Chloride Testing and Nasal Potential Difference (NPD) Are Primary Outcome Parameters in Treatment with Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Modulators
title_sort sweat chloride testing and nasal potential difference (npd) are primary outcome parameters in treatment with cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (cftr) modulators
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8398324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34442373
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080729
work_keys_str_mv AT sermetgaudelusisabelle sweatchloridetestingandnasalpotentialdifferencenpdareprimaryoutcomeparametersintreatmentwithcysticfibrosistransmembraneconductanceregulatorcftrmodulators
AT nguyenkhoathao sweatchloridetestingandnasalpotentialdifferencenpdareprimaryoutcomeparametersintreatmentwithcysticfibrosistransmembraneconductanceregulatorcftrmodulators
AT hattonaurelie sweatchloridetestingandnasalpotentialdifferencenpdareprimaryoutcomeparametersintreatmentwithcysticfibrosistransmembraneconductanceregulatorcftrmodulators
AT hayeskate sweatchloridetestingandnasalpotentialdifferencenpdareprimaryoutcomeparametersintreatmentwithcysticfibrosistransmembraneconductanceregulatorcftrmodulators
AT prankeiwona sweatchloridetestingandnasalpotentialdifferencenpdareprimaryoutcomeparametersintreatmentwithcysticfibrosistransmembraneconductanceregulatorcftrmodulators