Cargando…

Consequences of using chronological age versus corrected age when testing cognitive and motor development in infancy and intelligence quotient at school age for children born preterm

BACKGROUND: Children born preterm (<37 weeks’ gestation) have an increased risk of poor neurodevelopment, including lower intelligence quotient (IQ) scores compared with their term-born counterparts. OBJECTIVE: To explore the differences in psychometric scores for cognition and motor skills when...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gould, Jacqueline F., Fuss, Belinda G., Roberts, Rachel M., Collins, Carmel T., Makrides, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8412365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34473781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256824
_version_ 1783747439003435008
author Gould, Jacqueline F.
Fuss, Belinda G.
Roberts, Rachel M.
Collins, Carmel T.
Makrides, Maria
author_facet Gould, Jacqueline F.
Fuss, Belinda G.
Roberts, Rachel M.
Collins, Carmel T.
Makrides, Maria
author_sort Gould, Jacqueline F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Children born preterm (<37 weeks’ gestation) have an increased risk of poor neurodevelopment, including lower intelligence quotient (IQ) scores compared with their term-born counterparts. OBJECTIVE: To explore the differences in psychometric scores for cognition and motor skills when they are age-standardized according to chronological age instead of corrected age for children born preterm. METHODS: We assessed = 554 children born <33 weeks’ gestation with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 2(nd) edition (mental and motor scores) at 18 months and the Weschler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (IQ score) at seven years of age. Scores were standardized according to chronological age and corrected age and differences between mean chronological and corrected scores were compared, along with the proportion of children whose scores could be classified as impaired. RESULTS: When scores were standardized according to chronological age instead of corrected age there was a large significant difference of 17.3 points on the mental scale (79.5 vs. 96.8, respectively) and 11.8 points on the motor scale (84.8 vs. 96.6, respectively) at 18 months. By seven years, the difference in IQ scores remained, although of a smaller magnitude at 1.9 points between mean chronological and corrected age scoring (97.2 vs. 99.1, respectively). CONCLUSION: Consistent with previous literature, outcome assessments for preterm infants consistently differed according to use of chronological or corrected age to standardized scores. Cognitive scores were impacted more severely than motor scores, and differences were more substantial in early childhood than later in childhood. For clinical purposes, correction for preterm birth is only likely to have an impact during early childhood, however assessments for research purposes should continue to correct into childhood to account for the persistent bias due to preterm birth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8412365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84123652021-09-03 Consequences of using chronological age versus corrected age when testing cognitive and motor development in infancy and intelligence quotient at school age for children born preterm Gould, Jacqueline F. Fuss, Belinda G. Roberts, Rachel M. Collins, Carmel T. Makrides, Maria PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Children born preterm (<37 weeks’ gestation) have an increased risk of poor neurodevelopment, including lower intelligence quotient (IQ) scores compared with their term-born counterparts. OBJECTIVE: To explore the differences in psychometric scores for cognition and motor skills when they are age-standardized according to chronological age instead of corrected age for children born preterm. METHODS: We assessed = 554 children born <33 weeks’ gestation with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 2(nd) edition (mental and motor scores) at 18 months and the Weschler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (IQ score) at seven years of age. Scores were standardized according to chronological age and corrected age and differences between mean chronological and corrected scores were compared, along with the proportion of children whose scores could be classified as impaired. RESULTS: When scores were standardized according to chronological age instead of corrected age there was a large significant difference of 17.3 points on the mental scale (79.5 vs. 96.8, respectively) and 11.8 points on the motor scale (84.8 vs. 96.6, respectively) at 18 months. By seven years, the difference in IQ scores remained, although of a smaller magnitude at 1.9 points between mean chronological and corrected age scoring (97.2 vs. 99.1, respectively). CONCLUSION: Consistent with previous literature, outcome assessments for preterm infants consistently differed according to use of chronological or corrected age to standardized scores. Cognitive scores were impacted more severely than motor scores, and differences were more substantial in early childhood than later in childhood. For clinical purposes, correction for preterm birth is only likely to have an impact during early childhood, however assessments for research purposes should continue to correct into childhood to account for the persistent bias due to preterm birth. Public Library of Science 2021-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8412365/ /pubmed/34473781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256824 Text en © 2021 Gould et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gould, Jacqueline F.
Fuss, Belinda G.
Roberts, Rachel M.
Collins, Carmel T.
Makrides, Maria
Consequences of using chronological age versus corrected age when testing cognitive and motor development in infancy and intelligence quotient at school age for children born preterm
title Consequences of using chronological age versus corrected age when testing cognitive and motor development in infancy and intelligence quotient at school age for children born preterm
title_full Consequences of using chronological age versus corrected age when testing cognitive and motor development in infancy and intelligence quotient at school age for children born preterm
title_fullStr Consequences of using chronological age versus corrected age when testing cognitive and motor development in infancy and intelligence quotient at school age for children born preterm
title_full_unstemmed Consequences of using chronological age versus corrected age when testing cognitive and motor development in infancy and intelligence quotient at school age for children born preterm
title_short Consequences of using chronological age versus corrected age when testing cognitive and motor development in infancy and intelligence quotient at school age for children born preterm
title_sort consequences of using chronological age versus corrected age when testing cognitive and motor development in infancy and intelligence quotient at school age for children born preterm
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8412365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34473781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256824
work_keys_str_mv AT gouldjacquelinef consequencesofusingchronologicalageversuscorrectedagewhentestingcognitiveandmotordevelopmentininfancyandintelligencequotientatschoolageforchildrenbornpreterm
AT fussbelindag consequencesofusingchronologicalageversuscorrectedagewhentestingcognitiveandmotordevelopmentininfancyandintelligencequotientatschoolageforchildrenbornpreterm
AT robertsrachelm consequencesofusingchronologicalageversuscorrectedagewhentestingcognitiveandmotordevelopmentininfancyandintelligencequotientatschoolageforchildrenbornpreterm
AT collinscarmelt consequencesofusingchronologicalageversuscorrectedagewhentestingcognitiveandmotordevelopmentininfancyandintelligencequotientatschoolageforchildrenbornpreterm
AT makridesmaria consequencesofusingchronologicalageversuscorrectedagewhentestingcognitiveandmotordevelopmentininfancyandintelligencequotientatschoolageforchildrenbornpreterm