Cargando…

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutation Detection in Histology and Cytology Specimens of Primary Lung Adenocarcinoma: Immunohistochemistry Versus the Molecular Method

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in lung adenocarcinoma is associated with good clinical response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase therapy. The two most common EGFR gene mutations, representing 80 to 90%, are the E746-A750 deletion in exon 19 and the L858R point mutation in exon 21. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdul Hamid, Nurul Shuhada, Mat Zin, Anani Aila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8418853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34181354
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.6.1935
_version_ 1783748646112591872
author Abdul Hamid, Nurul Shuhada
Mat Zin, Anani Aila
author_facet Abdul Hamid, Nurul Shuhada
Mat Zin, Anani Aila
author_sort Abdul Hamid, Nurul Shuhada
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in lung adenocarcinoma is associated with good clinical response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase therapy. The two most common EGFR gene mutations, representing 80 to 90%, are the E746-A750 deletion in exon 19 and the L858R point mutation in exon 21. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have conducted the study to evaluate immunohistochemistry’s performance in detecting the E746-A750 deletion in exon 19 of the EGFR gene in primary lung adenocarcinoma cases. This study examined 133 cases of primary lung adenocarcinoma for three years duration. The selected cases were tested for EGFR gene mutations by real-time PCR by a reference laboratory. Most cases (124) were diagnosed by tissue biopsy, though nine used cell block cytology. We performed an immunohistochemistry test on 75 cases that contained adequate diagnostic material in the paraffin block. RESULTS: The test result was scored as 0 to 3+, based on the staining intensity and percentage of positive tumor cells. We evaluated the immunohistochemistry test’s sensitivity and specificity compared to the EGFR gene mutations by real-time PCR. There was a significant association between gender, smoking status, and the EGFR gene mutations (P < 0.001). The overall sensitivity and specificity of the immunohistochemistry test were 40% and 100%, respectively. The positive predictive value and negative predictive values were 100% and 76.9%, each. CONCLUSIONS: The immunohistochemistry has high specificity but low sensitivity in the detection of E746-A750 deletion in exon 19 of the EGFR gene. The mutation-specific antibody used in this study was unable to detect other uncommon variants of exon 19 deletions. With high specificity value, immunohistochemistry may provide an adjunct to molecular testing for detecting the most common EGFR gene mutations in cases of a low cellularity sample, financially-limited situations, or in critically ill cases where urgent targeted therapy is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8418853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84188532021-09-10 Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutation Detection in Histology and Cytology Specimens of Primary Lung Adenocarcinoma: Immunohistochemistry Versus the Molecular Method Abdul Hamid, Nurul Shuhada Mat Zin, Anani Aila Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in lung adenocarcinoma is associated with good clinical response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase therapy. The two most common EGFR gene mutations, representing 80 to 90%, are the E746-A750 deletion in exon 19 and the L858R point mutation in exon 21. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have conducted the study to evaluate immunohistochemistry’s performance in detecting the E746-A750 deletion in exon 19 of the EGFR gene in primary lung adenocarcinoma cases. This study examined 133 cases of primary lung adenocarcinoma for three years duration. The selected cases were tested for EGFR gene mutations by real-time PCR by a reference laboratory. Most cases (124) were diagnosed by tissue biopsy, though nine used cell block cytology. We performed an immunohistochemistry test on 75 cases that contained adequate diagnostic material in the paraffin block. RESULTS: The test result was scored as 0 to 3+, based on the staining intensity and percentage of positive tumor cells. We evaluated the immunohistochemistry test’s sensitivity and specificity compared to the EGFR gene mutations by real-time PCR. There was a significant association between gender, smoking status, and the EGFR gene mutations (P < 0.001). The overall sensitivity and specificity of the immunohistochemistry test were 40% and 100%, respectively. The positive predictive value and negative predictive values were 100% and 76.9%, each. CONCLUSIONS: The immunohistochemistry has high specificity but low sensitivity in the detection of E746-A750 deletion in exon 19 of the EGFR gene. The mutation-specific antibody used in this study was unable to detect other uncommon variants of exon 19 deletions. With high specificity value, immunohistochemistry may provide an adjunct to molecular testing for detecting the most common EGFR gene mutations in cases of a low cellularity sample, financially-limited situations, or in critically ill cases where urgent targeted therapy is needed. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8418853/ /pubmed/34181354 http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.6.1935 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Abdul Hamid, Nurul Shuhada
Mat Zin, Anani Aila
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutation Detection in Histology and Cytology Specimens of Primary Lung Adenocarcinoma: Immunohistochemistry Versus the Molecular Method
title Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutation Detection in Histology and Cytology Specimens of Primary Lung Adenocarcinoma: Immunohistochemistry Versus the Molecular Method
title_full Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutation Detection in Histology and Cytology Specimens of Primary Lung Adenocarcinoma: Immunohistochemistry Versus the Molecular Method
title_fullStr Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutation Detection in Histology and Cytology Specimens of Primary Lung Adenocarcinoma: Immunohistochemistry Versus the Molecular Method
title_full_unstemmed Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutation Detection in Histology and Cytology Specimens of Primary Lung Adenocarcinoma: Immunohistochemistry Versus the Molecular Method
title_short Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutation Detection in Histology and Cytology Specimens of Primary Lung Adenocarcinoma: Immunohistochemistry Versus the Molecular Method
title_sort epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation detection in histology and cytology specimens of primary lung adenocarcinoma: immunohistochemistry versus the molecular method
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8418853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34181354
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.6.1935
work_keys_str_mv AT abdulhamidnurulshuhada epidermalgrowthfactorreceptorgenemutationdetectioninhistologyandcytologyspecimensofprimarylungadenocarcinomaimmunohistochemistryversusthemolecularmethod
AT matzinananiaila epidermalgrowthfactorreceptorgenemutationdetectioninhistologyandcytologyspecimensofprimarylungadenocarcinomaimmunohistochemistryversusthemolecularmethod