Cargando…
Analytic Pearson residuals for normalization of single-cell RNA-seq UMI data
BACKGROUND: Standard preprocessing of single-cell RNA-seq UMI data includes normalization by sequencing depth to remove this technical variability, and nonlinear transformation to stabilize the variance across genes with different expression levels. Instead, two recent papers propose to use statisti...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34488842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-021-02451-7 |
_version_ | 1783748871114981376 |
---|---|
author | Lause, Jan Berens, Philipp Kobak, Dmitry |
author_facet | Lause, Jan Berens, Philipp Kobak, Dmitry |
author_sort | Lause, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Standard preprocessing of single-cell RNA-seq UMI data includes normalization by sequencing depth to remove this technical variability, and nonlinear transformation to stabilize the variance across genes with different expression levels. Instead, two recent papers propose to use statistical count models for these tasks: Hafemeister and Satija (Genome Biol 20:296, 2019) recommend using Pearson residuals from negative binomial regression, while Townes et al. (Genome Biol 20:295, 2019) recommend fitting a generalized PCA model. Here, we investigate the connection between these approaches theoretically and empirically, and compare their effects on downstream processing. RESULTS: We show that the model of Hafemeister and Satija produces noisy parameter estimates because it is overspecified, which is why the original paper employs post hoc smoothing. When specified more parsimoniously, it has a simple analytic solution equivalent to the rank-one Poisson GLM-PCA of Townes et al. Further, our analysis indicates that per-gene overdispersion estimates in Hafemeister and Satija are biased, and that the data are in fact consistent with the overdispersion parameter being independent of gene expression. We then use negative control data without biological variability to estimate the technical overdispersion of UMI counts, and find that across several different experimental protocols, the data are close to Poisson and suggest very moderate overdispersion. Finally, we perform a benchmark to compare the performance of Pearson residuals, variance-stabilizing transformations, and GLM-PCA on scRNA-seq datasets with known ground truth. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that analytic Pearson residuals strongly outperform other methods for identifying biologically variable genes, and capture more of the biologically meaningful variation when used for dimensionality reduction. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s13059-021-02451-7). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8419999 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84199992021-09-09 Analytic Pearson residuals for normalization of single-cell RNA-seq UMI data Lause, Jan Berens, Philipp Kobak, Dmitry Genome Biol Short Report BACKGROUND: Standard preprocessing of single-cell RNA-seq UMI data includes normalization by sequencing depth to remove this technical variability, and nonlinear transformation to stabilize the variance across genes with different expression levels. Instead, two recent papers propose to use statistical count models for these tasks: Hafemeister and Satija (Genome Biol 20:296, 2019) recommend using Pearson residuals from negative binomial regression, while Townes et al. (Genome Biol 20:295, 2019) recommend fitting a generalized PCA model. Here, we investigate the connection between these approaches theoretically and empirically, and compare their effects on downstream processing. RESULTS: We show that the model of Hafemeister and Satija produces noisy parameter estimates because it is overspecified, which is why the original paper employs post hoc smoothing. When specified more parsimoniously, it has a simple analytic solution equivalent to the rank-one Poisson GLM-PCA of Townes et al. Further, our analysis indicates that per-gene overdispersion estimates in Hafemeister and Satija are biased, and that the data are in fact consistent with the overdispersion parameter being independent of gene expression. We then use negative control data without biological variability to estimate the technical overdispersion of UMI counts, and find that across several different experimental protocols, the data are close to Poisson and suggest very moderate overdispersion. Finally, we perform a benchmark to compare the performance of Pearson residuals, variance-stabilizing transformations, and GLM-PCA on scRNA-seq datasets with known ground truth. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that analytic Pearson residuals strongly outperform other methods for identifying biologically variable genes, and capture more of the biologically meaningful variation when used for dimensionality reduction. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s13059-021-02451-7). BioMed Central 2021-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8419999/ /pubmed/34488842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-021-02451-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Lause, Jan Berens, Philipp Kobak, Dmitry Analytic Pearson residuals for normalization of single-cell RNA-seq UMI data |
title | Analytic Pearson residuals for normalization of single-cell RNA-seq UMI data |
title_full | Analytic Pearson residuals for normalization of single-cell RNA-seq UMI data |
title_fullStr | Analytic Pearson residuals for normalization of single-cell RNA-seq UMI data |
title_full_unstemmed | Analytic Pearson residuals for normalization of single-cell RNA-seq UMI data |
title_short | Analytic Pearson residuals for normalization of single-cell RNA-seq UMI data |
title_sort | analytic pearson residuals for normalization of single-cell rna-seq umi data |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34488842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-021-02451-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lausejan analyticpearsonresidualsfornormalizationofsinglecellrnasequmidata AT berensphilipp analyticpearsonresidualsfornormalizationofsinglecellrnasequmidata AT kobakdmitry analyticpearsonresidualsfornormalizationofsinglecellrnasequmidata |