Suppression of CD80 Expression by ICP22 Affects Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Replication and CD8(+)IFN-γ(+) Infiltrates in the Eyes of Infected Mice but Not Latency Reactivation

Previously, we reported that herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) ICP22 binds to the CD80 promoter and suppresses its expression in vitro and in vivo. To better understand the impact of ICP22 binding to CD80 on HSV-1 infectivity and pathogenicity, we mapped the region of ICP22 required to bind the CD80 promoter to a 40-amino-acid (aa) region of ICP22. We constructed a recombinant HSV-1 expressing a truncated form of ICP22 that lacks these 40 aa, which does not bind to the CD80 promoter (KOS-ICP22Δ40) and retains the ability to replicate efficiently in rabbit skin cells, in contrast to ICP22-null virus. The replication of this recombinant virus in vitro and in vivo was higher than that of the ICP22-null virus, but virus replication kinetics were lower than those of the wild-type (WT) control virus. Similar to ICP22-null virus, the KOS-ICP22Δ40 mutant virus increased CD80 expression in dendritic cells (DCs) and interferon gamma (IFN-γ) expression in CD8(+) T cells but not CD4(+) T cells in infected mouse corneas. In contrast to the significantly reduced virus replication in the eyes of ocularly infected mice, the levels of latency reactivation were similar between KOS-ICP22Δ40 virus and WT virus. Thus, blocking ICP22 binding to the CD80 promoter using a recombinant virus expressing a truncated ICP22 that lacks CD80 promoter binding appears to reduce virus replication and enhance CD8(+)IFN-γ(+) infiltrates in corneas of infected mice, with no effect on latency reactivation. IMPORTANCE Direct binding of HSV-1 ICP22 to the CD80 promoter downregulates the expression of the costimulatory molecule CD80 but not CD86. In this study, we fine mapped the region of ICP22 required for binding to the CD80 promoter and constructed a recombinant virus containing a deletion in ICP22 that failed to bind to the CD80 promoter. This recombinant virus replicated less efficiently in vitro and in vivo than did the WT control virus, although CD80-expressing CD11c(+) cells and IFN-γ-expressing CD8(+) T cells were increased. Interestingly, the levels of latency and reactivation in the two viruses were similar despite lower virus replication in the eyes of infected mice. Therefore, blocking the interaction of ICP22 with the CD80 promoter could be used to temper the immune response.