Cargando…

Randomised, double-blind comparison of a fixed co-formulation of intra-articular polynucleotides and hyaluronic acid versus hyaluronic acid alone in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: two-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: A first-year interim analysis of this two-year study suggested that intra-articular injections of highly purified, natural-origin polynucleotides and hyaluronic acid (HA) as a fixed combination (PNHA) might improve knee function and joint pain more effectively than HA alone in patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stagni, Cesare, Rocchi, Martina, Mazzotta, Alessandro, Del Piccolo, Nicolandrea, Rani, Nicola, Govoni, Marco, Vivarelli, Leonardo, Veronesi, Francesca, Fini, Milena, Dallari, Dante
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8436495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34511091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04648-0
_version_ 1783752005135630336
author Stagni, Cesare
Rocchi, Martina
Mazzotta, Alessandro
Del Piccolo, Nicolandrea
Rani, Nicola
Govoni, Marco
Vivarelli, Leonardo
Veronesi, Francesca
Fini, Milena
Dallari, Dante
author_facet Stagni, Cesare
Rocchi, Martina
Mazzotta, Alessandro
Del Piccolo, Nicolandrea
Rani, Nicola
Govoni, Marco
Vivarelli, Leonardo
Veronesi, Francesca
Fini, Milena
Dallari, Dante
author_sort Stagni, Cesare
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A first-year interim analysis of this two-year study suggested that intra-articular injections of highly purified, natural-origin polynucleotides and hyaluronic acid (HA) as a fixed combination (PNHA) might improve knee function and joint pain more effectively than HA alone in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of the second-year analysis herein described was to verify whether the first-year interim outcomes persist over the whole two-year period. METHODS: Randomised, double-blind, HA-controlled clinical trial in 100 knee OA patients (98 randomised, 79 completing the study) in a high-specialisation tertiary care setting. The hypothesised difference of efficacy between PNHA and HA for the original sample size estimate is 20%. Treatment cycle: three intra-articular knee injections of either PNHA or HA, at baseline and weekly for two weeks. Evaluations: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) score and Knee Society Score (KSS) as, respectively, primary and secondary endpoints, evaluated at baseline and after 2, 6, 12, and 24 months; synovial fluid levels of mediators (at baseline and the end of the treatment cycle). Adverse effects investigated at each control visit. Statistical analysis: Kruskal-Wallis test for independent samples (nonparametric one-way analysis of variance) after correction of means for age, Body Mass Index and Kellgren-Lawrence grade. If significant, pairwise post-hoc Sidak multiple comparisons. RESULTS: KSS total score and KSS pain item: significant improvement in both groups, with significantly more pain improvement in patients treated with PNHA (2-point reduction) than HA (1-point reduction). Both groups experienced significant long-term reductions in WOMAC total scores: significantly stronger in PNHA-treated patients after 24 months with a steady difference of 16% favouring PNHA in WOMAC pain subscore. No clinically significant adverse events in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of the 2-year study confirmed that a short cycle of intra-articular treatment (3 weekly double-blind injections) with polynucleotides (long-acting viscosupplementation properties, chondrocyte activation, pain-relieving properties) in fixed combination with high molecular weight hyaluronic acid is more effective in improving knee function and pain in knee OA patients than HA alone. PNHA may be elective for viscosupplementation in knee OA patients with fastidious and resistant pain and worsening disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02417610. Registration, 15/04/2015. ClinicalTrials.gov database link:
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8436495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84364952021-09-13 Randomised, double-blind comparison of a fixed co-formulation of intra-articular polynucleotides and hyaluronic acid versus hyaluronic acid alone in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: two-year follow-up Stagni, Cesare Rocchi, Martina Mazzotta, Alessandro Del Piccolo, Nicolandrea Rani, Nicola Govoni, Marco Vivarelli, Leonardo Veronesi, Francesca Fini, Milena Dallari, Dante BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: A first-year interim analysis of this two-year study suggested that intra-articular injections of highly purified, natural-origin polynucleotides and hyaluronic acid (HA) as a fixed combination (PNHA) might improve knee function and joint pain more effectively than HA alone in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of the second-year analysis herein described was to verify whether the first-year interim outcomes persist over the whole two-year period. METHODS: Randomised, double-blind, HA-controlled clinical trial in 100 knee OA patients (98 randomised, 79 completing the study) in a high-specialisation tertiary care setting. The hypothesised difference of efficacy between PNHA and HA for the original sample size estimate is 20%. Treatment cycle: three intra-articular knee injections of either PNHA or HA, at baseline and weekly for two weeks. Evaluations: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) score and Knee Society Score (KSS) as, respectively, primary and secondary endpoints, evaluated at baseline and after 2, 6, 12, and 24 months; synovial fluid levels of mediators (at baseline and the end of the treatment cycle). Adverse effects investigated at each control visit. Statistical analysis: Kruskal-Wallis test for independent samples (nonparametric one-way analysis of variance) after correction of means for age, Body Mass Index and Kellgren-Lawrence grade. If significant, pairwise post-hoc Sidak multiple comparisons. RESULTS: KSS total score and KSS pain item: significant improvement in both groups, with significantly more pain improvement in patients treated with PNHA (2-point reduction) than HA (1-point reduction). Both groups experienced significant long-term reductions in WOMAC total scores: significantly stronger in PNHA-treated patients after 24 months with a steady difference of 16% favouring PNHA in WOMAC pain subscore. No clinically significant adverse events in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of the 2-year study confirmed that a short cycle of intra-articular treatment (3 weekly double-blind injections) with polynucleotides (long-acting viscosupplementation properties, chondrocyte activation, pain-relieving properties) in fixed combination with high molecular weight hyaluronic acid is more effective in improving knee function and pain in knee OA patients than HA alone. PNHA may be elective for viscosupplementation in knee OA patients with fastidious and resistant pain and worsening disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02417610. Registration, 15/04/2015. ClinicalTrials.gov database link: BioMed Central 2021-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8436495/ /pubmed/34511091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04648-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Stagni, Cesare
Rocchi, Martina
Mazzotta, Alessandro
Del Piccolo, Nicolandrea
Rani, Nicola
Govoni, Marco
Vivarelli, Leonardo
Veronesi, Francesca
Fini, Milena
Dallari, Dante
Randomised, double-blind comparison of a fixed co-formulation of intra-articular polynucleotides and hyaluronic acid versus hyaluronic acid alone in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: two-year follow-up
title Randomised, double-blind comparison of a fixed co-formulation of intra-articular polynucleotides and hyaluronic acid versus hyaluronic acid alone in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: two-year follow-up
title_full Randomised, double-blind comparison of a fixed co-formulation of intra-articular polynucleotides and hyaluronic acid versus hyaluronic acid alone in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: two-year follow-up
title_fullStr Randomised, double-blind comparison of a fixed co-formulation of intra-articular polynucleotides and hyaluronic acid versus hyaluronic acid alone in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: two-year follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Randomised, double-blind comparison of a fixed co-formulation of intra-articular polynucleotides and hyaluronic acid versus hyaluronic acid alone in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: two-year follow-up
title_short Randomised, double-blind comparison of a fixed co-formulation of intra-articular polynucleotides and hyaluronic acid versus hyaluronic acid alone in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: two-year follow-up
title_sort randomised, double-blind comparison of a fixed co-formulation of intra-articular polynucleotides and hyaluronic acid versus hyaluronic acid alone in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: two-year follow-up
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8436495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34511091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04648-0
work_keys_str_mv AT stagnicesare randomiseddoubleblindcomparisonofafixedcoformulationofintraarticularpolynucleotidesandhyaluronicacidversushyaluronicacidaloneinthetreatmentofkneeosteoarthritistwoyearfollowup
AT rocchimartina randomiseddoubleblindcomparisonofafixedcoformulationofintraarticularpolynucleotidesandhyaluronicacidversushyaluronicacidaloneinthetreatmentofkneeosteoarthritistwoyearfollowup
AT mazzottaalessandro randomiseddoubleblindcomparisonofafixedcoformulationofintraarticularpolynucleotidesandhyaluronicacidversushyaluronicacidaloneinthetreatmentofkneeosteoarthritistwoyearfollowup
AT delpiccolonicolandrea randomiseddoubleblindcomparisonofafixedcoformulationofintraarticularpolynucleotidesandhyaluronicacidversushyaluronicacidaloneinthetreatmentofkneeosteoarthritistwoyearfollowup
AT raninicola randomiseddoubleblindcomparisonofafixedcoformulationofintraarticularpolynucleotidesandhyaluronicacidversushyaluronicacidaloneinthetreatmentofkneeosteoarthritistwoyearfollowup
AT govonimarco randomiseddoubleblindcomparisonofafixedcoformulationofintraarticularpolynucleotidesandhyaluronicacidversushyaluronicacidaloneinthetreatmentofkneeosteoarthritistwoyearfollowup
AT vivarellileonardo randomiseddoubleblindcomparisonofafixedcoformulationofintraarticularpolynucleotidesandhyaluronicacidversushyaluronicacidaloneinthetreatmentofkneeosteoarthritistwoyearfollowup
AT veronesifrancesca randomiseddoubleblindcomparisonofafixedcoformulationofintraarticularpolynucleotidesandhyaluronicacidversushyaluronicacidaloneinthetreatmentofkneeosteoarthritistwoyearfollowup
AT finimilena randomiseddoubleblindcomparisonofafixedcoformulationofintraarticularpolynucleotidesandhyaluronicacidversushyaluronicacidaloneinthetreatmentofkneeosteoarthritistwoyearfollowup
AT dallaridante randomiseddoubleblindcomparisonofafixedcoformulationofintraarticularpolynucleotidesandhyaluronicacidversushyaluronicacidaloneinthetreatmentofkneeosteoarthritistwoyearfollowup