Cargando…

Identification of the Carbohydrate and Organic Acid Metabolism Genes Responsible for Brix in Tomato Fruit by Transcriptome and Metabolome Analysis

BACKGROUND: Sugar and organic acids not only contribute to the formation of soluble solids (Brix) but also are an essential factor affecting the overall flavor intensity. However, the possible metabolic targets and molecular synthesis mechanisms remain to be further clarified. METHODS: UHPLC-HRMS (u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Ning, Wang, Juan, Wang, Baike, Huang, Shaoyong, Hu, Jiahui, Yang, Tao, Asmutola, Patiguli, Lan, Haiyan, Qinghui, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8446636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34539743
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.714942
_version_ 1784568923621949440
author Li, Ning
Wang, Juan
Wang, Baike
Huang, Shaoyong
Hu, Jiahui
Yang, Tao
Asmutola, Patiguli
Lan, Haiyan
Qinghui, Yu
author_facet Li, Ning
Wang, Juan
Wang, Baike
Huang, Shaoyong
Hu, Jiahui
Yang, Tao
Asmutola, Patiguli
Lan, Haiyan
Qinghui, Yu
author_sort Li, Ning
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sugar and organic acids not only contribute to the formation of soluble solids (Brix) but also are an essential factor affecting the overall flavor intensity. However, the possible metabolic targets and molecular synthesis mechanisms remain to be further clarified. METHODS: UHPLC-HRMS (ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometry) combined with comparative transcriptome analysis were performed in fruits at green ripe (S1), turning-color (S2), and red ripe (S3) stages of two tomato genotypes TM-1 (Solanum galapagense L., LA0436) and TM-38 (S. lycopersicum L. cultivar M82, LA3475) that vary in fruit Brix. RESULTS: The fruit Brix of TM-1 was nearly twice that of TM-38 at S3. Nevertheless, TM-1 accumulated 1.84- and 2.77-fold the L-malic acid and citric acid in red ripe fruit (S3) compared with TM-38, respectively. D-glucose and D-fructose in TM-1 and TM-38 fruits tended to be similar at S3. Concomitantly, the sugar/organic acid ratio of TM-38 fruits were 23. 08-, 4. 38-, and 2.59-fold higher than that of TM-1 fruits at S1, S2, and S3, respectively. Among starch and sucrose (carbohydrate, CHO) metabolism (ko00500) genes, SUS (Solyc07g042550.3) and BAM (Solyc08g077530.3) were positively (r = 0.885–0.931) correlated with the sugar/organic acid ratio. Besides, INV (Solyc09g010080.3 and Solyc09g010090.5.1), AAM (Solyc04g082090.3), 4-α-GTase (Solyc02g020980.2.1), BGL2 (Solyc06g073750.4, Solyc06g073760.3, and Solyc01g081170.3), TPS (Solyc01g005210.2 and Solyc07g006500.3), and TPP (Solyc08g079060.4) were negatively (r = −0.823 to −0.918) correlated with the sugar/organic acid ratio. The organic acid (TCA cycle) metabolism (ko00020) gene ALMT (Solyc01g096140.3) was also negatively (r = −0.905) correlated with the sugar/organic acid ratio. CONCLUSION: Citric acid may play a more dominant role in the sugar/organic acid ratio of the tomato fruit, and the contribution of both L-malic acid and citric acid to the fruit Brix was much greater than that of D-glucose and D-fructose. Genes involved in CHO and TCA metabolism, which have a significant correlation with the sugar/organic acid ratio were considered to be the contributing factors of fruit Brix.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8446636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84466362021-09-18 Identification of the Carbohydrate and Organic Acid Metabolism Genes Responsible for Brix in Tomato Fruit by Transcriptome and Metabolome Analysis Li, Ning Wang, Juan Wang, Baike Huang, Shaoyong Hu, Jiahui Yang, Tao Asmutola, Patiguli Lan, Haiyan Qinghui, Yu Front Genet Genetics BACKGROUND: Sugar and organic acids not only contribute to the formation of soluble solids (Brix) but also are an essential factor affecting the overall flavor intensity. However, the possible metabolic targets and molecular synthesis mechanisms remain to be further clarified. METHODS: UHPLC-HRMS (ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometry) combined with comparative transcriptome analysis were performed in fruits at green ripe (S1), turning-color (S2), and red ripe (S3) stages of two tomato genotypes TM-1 (Solanum galapagense L., LA0436) and TM-38 (S. lycopersicum L. cultivar M82, LA3475) that vary in fruit Brix. RESULTS: The fruit Brix of TM-1 was nearly twice that of TM-38 at S3. Nevertheless, TM-1 accumulated 1.84- and 2.77-fold the L-malic acid and citric acid in red ripe fruit (S3) compared with TM-38, respectively. D-glucose and D-fructose in TM-1 and TM-38 fruits tended to be similar at S3. Concomitantly, the sugar/organic acid ratio of TM-38 fruits were 23. 08-, 4. 38-, and 2.59-fold higher than that of TM-1 fruits at S1, S2, and S3, respectively. Among starch and sucrose (carbohydrate, CHO) metabolism (ko00500) genes, SUS (Solyc07g042550.3) and BAM (Solyc08g077530.3) were positively (r = 0.885–0.931) correlated with the sugar/organic acid ratio. Besides, INV (Solyc09g010080.3 and Solyc09g010090.5.1), AAM (Solyc04g082090.3), 4-α-GTase (Solyc02g020980.2.1), BGL2 (Solyc06g073750.4, Solyc06g073760.3, and Solyc01g081170.3), TPS (Solyc01g005210.2 and Solyc07g006500.3), and TPP (Solyc08g079060.4) were negatively (r = −0.823 to −0.918) correlated with the sugar/organic acid ratio. The organic acid (TCA cycle) metabolism (ko00020) gene ALMT (Solyc01g096140.3) was also negatively (r = −0.905) correlated with the sugar/organic acid ratio. CONCLUSION: Citric acid may play a more dominant role in the sugar/organic acid ratio of the tomato fruit, and the contribution of both L-malic acid and citric acid to the fruit Brix was much greater than that of D-glucose and D-fructose. Genes involved in CHO and TCA metabolism, which have a significant correlation with the sugar/organic acid ratio were considered to be the contributing factors of fruit Brix. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8446636/ /pubmed/34539743 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.714942 Text en Copyright © 2021 Li, Wang, Wang, Huang, Hu, Yang, Asmutola, Lan and Qinghui. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Li, Ning
Wang, Juan
Wang, Baike
Huang, Shaoyong
Hu, Jiahui
Yang, Tao
Asmutola, Patiguli
Lan, Haiyan
Qinghui, Yu
Identification of the Carbohydrate and Organic Acid Metabolism Genes Responsible for Brix in Tomato Fruit by Transcriptome and Metabolome Analysis
title Identification of the Carbohydrate and Organic Acid Metabolism Genes Responsible for Brix in Tomato Fruit by Transcriptome and Metabolome Analysis
title_full Identification of the Carbohydrate and Organic Acid Metabolism Genes Responsible for Brix in Tomato Fruit by Transcriptome and Metabolome Analysis
title_fullStr Identification of the Carbohydrate and Organic Acid Metabolism Genes Responsible for Brix in Tomato Fruit by Transcriptome and Metabolome Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Identification of the Carbohydrate and Organic Acid Metabolism Genes Responsible for Brix in Tomato Fruit by Transcriptome and Metabolome Analysis
title_short Identification of the Carbohydrate and Organic Acid Metabolism Genes Responsible for Brix in Tomato Fruit by Transcriptome and Metabolome Analysis
title_sort identification of the carbohydrate and organic acid metabolism genes responsible for brix in tomato fruit by transcriptome and metabolome analysis
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8446636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34539743
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.714942
work_keys_str_mv AT lining identificationofthecarbohydrateandorganicacidmetabolismgenesresponsibleforbrixintomatofruitbytranscriptomeandmetabolomeanalysis
AT wangjuan identificationofthecarbohydrateandorganicacidmetabolismgenesresponsibleforbrixintomatofruitbytranscriptomeandmetabolomeanalysis
AT wangbaike identificationofthecarbohydrateandorganicacidmetabolismgenesresponsibleforbrixintomatofruitbytranscriptomeandmetabolomeanalysis
AT huangshaoyong identificationofthecarbohydrateandorganicacidmetabolismgenesresponsibleforbrixintomatofruitbytranscriptomeandmetabolomeanalysis
AT hujiahui identificationofthecarbohydrateandorganicacidmetabolismgenesresponsibleforbrixintomatofruitbytranscriptomeandmetabolomeanalysis
AT yangtao identificationofthecarbohydrateandorganicacidmetabolismgenesresponsibleforbrixintomatofruitbytranscriptomeandmetabolomeanalysis
AT asmutolapatiguli identificationofthecarbohydrateandorganicacidmetabolismgenesresponsibleforbrixintomatofruitbytranscriptomeandmetabolomeanalysis
AT lanhaiyan identificationofthecarbohydrateandorganicacidmetabolismgenesresponsibleforbrixintomatofruitbytranscriptomeandmetabolomeanalysis
AT qinghuiyu identificationofthecarbohydrateandorganicacidmetabolismgenesresponsibleforbrixintomatofruitbytranscriptomeandmetabolomeanalysis