Cargando…

No Time to Lift? Designing Time-Efficient Training Programs for Strength and Hypertrophy: A Narrative Review

ABSTRACT: Lack of time is among the more commonly reported barriers for abstention from exercise programs. The aim of this review was to determine how strength training can be most effectively carried out in a time-efficient manner by critically evaluating research on acute training variables, advan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iversen, Vegard M., Norum, Martin, Schoenfeld, Brad J., Fimland, Marius S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8449772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34125411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01490-1
_version_ 1784569489266835456
author Iversen, Vegard M.
Norum, Martin
Schoenfeld, Brad J.
Fimland, Marius S.
author_facet Iversen, Vegard M.
Norum, Martin
Schoenfeld, Brad J.
Fimland, Marius S.
author_sort Iversen, Vegard M.
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: Lack of time is among the more commonly reported barriers for abstention from exercise programs. The aim of this review was to determine how strength training can be most effectively carried out in a time-efficient manner by critically evaluating research on acute training variables, advanced training techniques, and the need for warm-up and stretching. When programming strength training for optimum time-efficiency we recommend prioritizing bilateral, multi-joint exercises that include full dynamic movements (i.e. both eccentric and concentric muscle actions), and to perform a minimum of one leg pressing exercise (e.g. squats), one upper-body pulling exercise (e.g. pull-up) and one upper-body pushing exercise (e.g. bench press). Exercises can be performed with machines and/or free weights based on training goals, availability, and personal preferences. Weekly training volume is more important than training frequency and we recommend performing a minimum of 4 weekly sets per muscle group using a 6–15 RM loading range (15–40 repetitions can be used if training is performed to volitional failure). Advanced training techniques, such as supersets, drop sets and rest-pause training roughly halves training time compared to traditional training, while maintaining training volume. However, these methods are probably better at inducing hypertrophy than muscular strength, and more research is needed on longitudinal training effects. Finally, we advise restricting the warm-up to exercise-specific warm-ups, and only prioritize stretching if the goal of training is to increase flexibility. This review shows how acute training variables can be manipulated, and how specific training techniques can be used to optimize the training response: time ratio in regard to improvements in strength and hypertrophy. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8449772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84497722021-10-01 No Time to Lift? Designing Time-Efficient Training Programs for Strength and Hypertrophy: A Narrative Review Iversen, Vegard M. Norum, Martin Schoenfeld, Brad J. Fimland, Marius S. Sports Med Review Article ABSTRACT: Lack of time is among the more commonly reported barriers for abstention from exercise programs. The aim of this review was to determine how strength training can be most effectively carried out in a time-efficient manner by critically evaluating research on acute training variables, advanced training techniques, and the need for warm-up and stretching. When programming strength training for optimum time-efficiency we recommend prioritizing bilateral, multi-joint exercises that include full dynamic movements (i.e. both eccentric and concentric muscle actions), and to perform a minimum of one leg pressing exercise (e.g. squats), one upper-body pulling exercise (e.g. pull-up) and one upper-body pushing exercise (e.g. bench press). Exercises can be performed with machines and/or free weights based on training goals, availability, and personal preferences. Weekly training volume is more important than training frequency and we recommend performing a minimum of 4 weekly sets per muscle group using a 6–15 RM loading range (15–40 repetitions can be used if training is performed to volitional failure). Advanced training techniques, such as supersets, drop sets and rest-pause training roughly halves training time compared to traditional training, while maintaining training volume. However, these methods are probably better at inducing hypertrophy than muscular strength, and more research is needed on longitudinal training effects. Finally, we advise restricting the warm-up to exercise-specific warm-ups, and only prioritize stretching if the goal of training is to increase flexibility. This review shows how acute training variables can be manipulated, and how specific training techniques can be used to optimize the training response: time ratio in regard to improvements in strength and hypertrophy. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer International Publishing 2021-06-14 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8449772/ /pubmed/34125411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01490-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Iversen, Vegard M.
Norum, Martin
Schoenfeld, Brad J.
Fimland, Marius S.
No Time to Lift? Designing Time-Efficient Training Programs for Strength and Hypertrophy: A Narrative Review
title No Time to Lift? Designing Time-Efficient Training Programs for Strength and Hypertrophy: A Narrative Review
title_full No Time to Lift? Designing Time-Efficient Training Programs for Strength and Hypertrophy: A Narrative Review
title_fullStr No Time to Lift? Designing Time-Efficient Training Programs for Strength and Hypertrophy: A Narrative Review
title_full_unstemmed No Time to Lift? Designing Time-Efficient Training Programs for Strength and Hypertrophy: A Narrative Review
title_short No Time to Lift? Designing Time-Efficient Training Programs for Strength and Hypertrophy: A Narrative Review
title_sort no time to lift? designing time-efficient training programs for strength and hypertrophy: a narrative review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8449772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34125411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01490-1
work_keys_str_mv AT iversenvegardm notimetoliftdesigningtimeefficienttrainingprogramsforstrengthandhypertrophyanarrativereview
AT norummartin notimetoliftdesigningtimeefficienttrainingprogramsforstrengthandhypertrophyanarrativereview
AT schoenfeldbradj notimetoliftdesigningtimeefficienttrainingprogramsforstrengthandhypertrophyanarrativereview
AT fimlandmariuss notimetoliftdesigningtimeefficienttrainingprogramsforstrengthandhypertrophyanarrativereview