Cargando…
Perspectives of Clinical Teaching Fellows on preparedness for practice: a mixed-methods exploration of what needs to change
Supporting medical students in their transition to newly qualified doctor is an important educational priority. Clinical Teaching Fellows (CTFs), as both recent graduates and trained educators, are uniquely positioned to suggest curricular enhancements to support preparedness for practice. Our mixed...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34530702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1976443 |
_version_ | 1784569885389488128 |
---|---|
author | Morrice, Rory Buckeldee, Olivia Leedham-Green, Kathleen |
author_facet | Morrice, Rory Buckeldee, Olivia Leedham-Green, Kathleen |
author_sort | Morrice, Rory |
collection | PubMed |
description | Supporting medical students in their transition to newly qualified doctor is an important educational priority. Clinical Teaching Fellows (CTFs), as both recent graduates and trained educators, are uniquely positioned to suggest curricular enhancements to support preparedness for practice. Our mixed-methods approach involved CTFs across eight UK teaching hospitals. We conducted five activity-oriented focus groups to explore what CTFs felt needed to change to increase preparedness for practice. We analysed these focus groups to create a dataset of their suggestions followed by a survey. The survey invited CTFs to rate and rank these suggestions in relation to their own self-rated preparedness for practice, with qualitative insights into their choices. We explored commonalities and differences between high and low confidence participants, with findings qualitatively illuminated. 24 CTFs attended focus groups from which we identified 28 curriculum items and 10 curriculum agendas. We collected 23 complete survey responses. All confidence groups rated communicating with colleagues and managing working life as unmet needs, whereas core clinical competencies such as history and examination were well met. Participants with low confidence identified more complex clinical competencies including clinical decision making, task prioritisation and end-of-life care as unmet needs, with decision making and prioritisation being the most important. Confident graduates rated higher professional competencies such as quality improvement, career planning and education as unmet needs but of low importance. Graded transition of responsibility was the highest ranked curriculum agenda. Qualitative insights included suggestions for how learning in clinical environments could be enhanced. Our findings suggest that transitioning from student to newly qualified doctor could be supported by graded entrustment and enhanced shadowing opportunities. Other recommendations include prioritising more complex clinical competencies, identifying wellbeing as part of preparedness for practice, equipping students to communicate with colleagues and aligning higher professional competencies with learners’ needs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8451620 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84516202021-09-21 Perspectives of Clinical Teaching Fellows on preparedness for practice: a mixed-methods exploration of what needs to change Morrice, Rory Buckeldee, Olivia Leedham-Green, Kathleen Med Educ Online Research Article Supporting medical students in their transition to newly qualified doctor is an important educational priority. Clinical Teaching Fellows (CTFs), as both recent graduates and trained educators, are uniquely positioned to suggest curricular enhancements to support preparedness for practice. Our mixed-methods approach involved CTFs across eight UK teaching hospitals. We conducted five activity-oriented focus groups to explore what CTFs felt needed to change to increase preparedness for practice. We analysed these focus groups to create a dataset of their suggestions followed by a survey. The survey invited CTFs to rate and rank these suggestions in relation to their own self-rated preparedness for practice, with qualitative insights into their choices. We explored commonalities and differences between high and low confidence participants, with findings qualitatively illuminated. 24 CTFs attended focus groups from which we identified 28 curriculum items and 10 curriculum agendas. We collected 23 complete survey responses. All confidence groups rated communicating with colleagues and managing working life as unmet needs, whereas core clinical competencies such as history and examination were well met. Participants with low confidence identified more complex clinical competencies including clinical decision making, task prioritisation and end-of-life care as unmet needs, with decision making and prioritisation being the most important. Confident graduates rated higher professional competencies such as quality improvement, career planning and education as unmet needs but of low importance. Graded transition of responsibility was the highest ranked curriculum agenda. Qualitative insights included suggestions for how learning in clinical environments could be enhanced. Our findings suggest that transitioning from student to newly qualified doctor could be supported by graded entrustment and enhanced shadowing opportunities. Other recommendations include prioritising more complex clinical competencies, identifying wellbeing as part of preparedness for practice, equipping students to communicate with colleagues and aligning higher professional competencies with learners’ needs. Taylor & Francis 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8451620/ /pubmed/34530702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1976443 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Morrice, Rory Buckeldee, Olivia Leedham-Green, Kathleen Perspectives of Clinical Teaching Fellows on preparedness for practice: a mixed-methods exploration of what needs to change |
title | Perspectives of Clinical Teaching Fellows on preparedness for practice: a mixed-methods exploration of what needs to change |
title_full | Perspectives of Clinical Teaching Fellows on preparedness for practice: a mixed-methods exploration of what needs to change |
title_fullStr | Perspectives of Clinical Teaching Fellows on preparedness for practice: a mixed-methods exploration of what needs to change |
title_full_unstemmed | Perspectives of Clinical Teaching Fellows on preparedness for practice: a mixed-methods exploration of what needs to change |
title_short | Perspectives of Clinical Teaching Fellows on preparedness for practice: a mixed-methods exploration of what needs to change |
title_sort | perspectives of clinical teaching fellows on preparedness for practice: a mixed-methods exploration of what needs to change |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34530702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1976443 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morricerory perspectivesofclinicalteachingfellowsonpreparednessforpracticeamixedmethodsexplorationofwhatneedstochange AT buckeldeeolivia perspectivesofclinicalteachingfellowsonpreparednessforpracticeamixedmethodsexplorationofwhatneedstochange AT leedhamgreenkathleen perspectivesofclinicalteachingfellowsonpreparednessforpracticeamixedmethodsexplorationofwhatneedstochange |