Cargando…

Evaluation of Drug‐Drug Interaction Liability for Buprenorphine Extended‐Release Monthly Injection Administered by Subcutaneous Route

Buprenorphine extended‐release (BUP‐XR) formulation is a once‐monthly subcutaneous injection for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). Buprenorphine undergoes extensive cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 metabolism, leading to potential drug‐drug interactions (DDIs) as reported for sublingual buprenorp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kharidia, Jahnavi, Howgate, Eleanor M., Laffont, Celine M., Liu, Yongzhen, Young, Malcolm A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33750027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.934
_version_ 1784569941024833536
author Kharidia, Jahnavi
Howgate, Eleanor M.
Laffont, Celine M.
Liu, Yongzhen
Young, Malcolm A.
author_facet Kharidia, Jahnavi
Howgate, Eleanor M.
Laffont, Celine M.
Liu, Yongzhen
Young, Malcolm A.
author_sort Kharidia, Jahnavi
collection PubMed
description Buprenorphine extended‐release (BUP‐XR) formulation is a once‐monthly subcutaneous injection for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). Buprenorphine undergoes extensive cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 metabolism, leading to potential drug‐drug interactions (DDIs) as reported for sublingual buprenorphine. Sublingual buprenorphine is subject to first‐pass extraction, as a significant proportion of the dose is swallowed. Because subcutaneous administration avoids first‐pass extraction, the DDI with CYP3A4 inhibitors is expected to be less than the 2‐fold increase reported for the sublingual route. The objective of this analysis was to predict the magnitude of DDI following coadministration of BUP‐XR with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor or inducer using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. Models were developed and verified by comparing predicted and observed data for buprenorphine following intravenous and sublingual dosing. Comparison of predicted and observed pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and PK parameters demonstrated acceptable predictive performance of the models (within 1.5‐fold). Buprenorphine plasma concentrations following administration of a single dose of BUP‐XR (300 mg) were simulated using a series of intravenous infusions. Daily coadministration of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors with BUP‐XR predicted mild increases in buprenorphine exposures (AUC, 33%‐44%; C(max), 17‐28%). Daily coadministration of a strong CYP3A4 inducer was also associated with mild decreases in buprenorphine AUC (28%) and C(max) (22%). In addition, the model predicted minimal increases in buprenorphine AUC (8%‐11%) under clinical conditions of 2 weeks’ treatment with CYP3A4 inhibitors administered after initiation of BUP‐XR. In conclusion, the PBPK predictions indicate that coadministration of BUP‐XR with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers would not result in clinically meaningful interactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8451859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84518592021-09-27 Evaluation of Drug‐Drug Interaction Liability for Buprenorphine Extended‐Release Monthly Injection Administered by Subcutaneous Route Kharidia, Jahnavi Howgate, Eleanor M. Laffont, Celine M. Liu, Yongzhen Young, Malcolm A. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev Articles Buprenorphine extended‐release (BUP‐XR) formulation is a once‐monthly subcutaneous injection for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). Buprenorphine undergoes extensive cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 metabolism, leading to potential drug‐drug interactions (DDIs) as reported for sublingual buprenorphine. Sublingual buprenorphine is subject to first‐pass extraction, as a significant proportion of the dose is swallowed. Because subcutaneous administration avoids first‐pass extraction, the DDI with CYP3A4 inhibitors is expected to be less than the 2‐fold increase reported for the sublingual route. The objective of this analysis was to predict the magnitude of DDI following coadministration of BUP‐XR with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor or inducer using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. Models were developed and verified by comparing predicted and observed data for buprenorphine following intravenous and sublingual dosing. Comparison of predicted and observed pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and PK parameters demonstrated acceptable predictive performance of the models (within 1.5‐fold). Buprenorphine plasma concentrations following administration of a single dose of BUP‐XR (300 mg) were simulated using a series of intravenous infusions. Daily coadministration of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors with BUP‐XR predicted mild increases in buprenorphine exposures (AUC, 33%‐44%; C(max), 17‐28%). Daily coadministration of a strong CYP3A4 inducer was also associated with mild decreases in buprenorphine AUC (28%) and C(max) (22%). In addition, the model predicted minimal increases in buprenorphine AUC (8%‐11%) under clinical conditions of 2 weeks’ treatment with CYP3A4 inhibitors administered after initiation of BUP‐XR. In conclusion, the PBPK predictions indicate that coadministration of BUP‐XR with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers would not result in clinically meaningful interactions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-22 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8451859/ /pubmed/33750027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.934 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Kharidia, Jahnavi
Howgate, Eleanor M.
Laffont, Celine M.
Liu, Yongzhen
Young, Malcolm A.
Evaluation of Drug‐Drug Interaction Liability for Buprenorphine Extended‐Release Monthly Injection Administered by Subcutaneous Route
title Evaluation of Drug‐Drug Interaction Liability for Buprenorphine Extended‐Release Monthly Injection Administered by Subcutaneous Route
title_full Evaluation of Drug‐Drug Interaction Liability for Buprenorphine Extended‐Release Monthly Injection Administered by Subcutaneous Route
title_fullStr Evaluation of Drug‐Drug Interaction Liability for Buprenorphine Extended‐Release Monthly Injection Administered by Subcutaneous Route
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Drug‐Drug Interaction Liability for Buprenorphine Extended‐Release Monthly Injection Administered by Subcutaneous Route
title_short Evaluation of Drug‐Drug Interaction Liability for Buprenorphine Extended‐Release Monthly Injection Administered by Subcutaneous Route
title_sort evaluation of drug‐drug interaction liability for buprenorphine extended‐release monthly injection administered by subcutaneous route
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33750027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.934
work_keys_str_mv AT kharidiajahnavi evaluationofdrugdruginteractionliabilityforbuprenorphineextendedreleasemonthlyinjectionadministeredbysubcutaneousroute
AT howgateeleanorm evaluationofdrugdruginteractionliabilityforbuprenorphineextendedreleasemonthlyinjectionadministeredbysubcutaneousroute
AT laffontcelinem evaluationofdrugdruginteractionliabilityforbuprenorphineextendedreleasemonthlyinjectionadministeredbysubcutaneousroute
AT liuyongzhen evaluationofdrugdruginteractionliabilityforbuprenorphineextendedreleasemonthlyinjectionadministeredbysubcutaneousroute
AT youngmalcolma evaluationofdrugdruginteractionliabilityforbuprenorphineextendedreleasemonthlyinjectionadministeredbysubcutaneousroute