Cargando…

Categorising ultra-processed foods in large-scale cohort studies: evidence from the Nurses’ Health Studies, the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, and the Growing Up Today Study

This manuscript details the strategy employed for categorising food items based on their processing levels into the four NOVA groups. Semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) from the Nurses’ Health Studies (NHS) I and II, the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS) and the Growing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khandpur, Neha, Rossato, Sinara, Drouin-Chartier, Jean-Philippe, Du, Mengxi, Steele, Euridice M., Sampson, Laura, Monteiro, Carlos, Zhang, Fang F., Willett, Walter, Fung, Teresa T., Sun, Qi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34589209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jns.2021.72
_version_ 1784570275215441920
author Khandpur, Neha
Rossato, Sinara
Drouin-Chartier, Jean-Philippe
Du, Mengxi
Steele, Euridice M.
Sampson, Laura
Monteiro, Carlos
Zhang, Fang F.
Willett, Walter
Fung, Teresa T.
Sun, Qi
author_facet Khandpur, Neha
Rossato, Sinara
Drouin-Chartier, Jean-Philippe
Du, Mengxi
Steele, Euridice M.
Sampson, Laura
Monteiro, Carlos
Zhang, Fang F.
Willett, Walter
Fung, Teresa T.
Sun, Qi
author_sort Khandpur, Neha
collection PubMed
description This manuscript details the strategy employed for categorising food items based on their processing levels into the four NOVA groups. Semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) from the Nurses’ Health Studies (NHS) I and II, the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS) and the Growing Up Today Studies (GUTS) I and II cohorts were used. The four-stage approach included: (i) the creation of a complete food list from the FFQs; (ii) assignment of food items to a NOVA group by three researchers; (iii) checking for consensus in categorisation and shortlisting discordant food items; (iv) discussions with experts and use of additional resources (research dieticians, cohort-specific documents, online grocery store scans) to guide the final categorisation of the short-listed items. At stage 1, 205 and 315 food items were compiled from the NHS and HPFS, and the GUTS FFQs, respectively. Over 70 % of food items from all cohorts were assigned to a NOVA group after stage 2. The remainder were shortlisted for further discussion (stage 3). After two rounds of reviews at stage 4, 95⋅6 % of food items (NHS + HPFS) and 90⋅7 % items (GUTS) were categorised. The remaining products were assigned to a non-ultra-processed food group (primary categorisation) and flagged for sensitivity analyses at which point they would be categorised as ultra-processed. Of all items in the food lists, 36⋅1 % in the NHS and HPFS cohorts and 43⋅5 % in the GUTS cohorts were identified as ultra-processed. Future work is needed to validate this approach. Documentation and discussions of alternative approaches for categorisation are encouraged.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8453454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84534542021-09-28 Categorising ultra-processed foods in large-scale cohort studies: evidence from the Nurses’ Health Studies, the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, and the Growing Up Today Study Khandpur, Neha Rossato, Sinara Drouin-Chartier, Jean-Philippe Du, Mengxi Steele, Euridice M. Sampson, Laura Monteiro, Carlos Zhang, Fang F. Willett, Walter Fung, Teresa T. Sun, Qi J Nutr Sci Research Article This manuscript details the strategy employed for categorising food items based on their processing levels into the four NOVA groups. Semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) from the Nurses’ Health Studies (NHS) I and II, the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS) and the Growing Up Today Studies (GUTS) I and II cohorts were used. The four-stage approach included: (i) the creation of a complete food list from the FFQs; (ii) assignment of food items to a NOVA group by three researchers; (iii) checking for consensus in categorisation and shortlisting discordant food items; (iv) discussions with experts and use of additional resources (research dieticians, cohort-specific documents, online grocery store scans) to guide the final categorisation of the short-listed items. At stage 1, 205 and 315 food items were compiled from the NHS and HPFS, and the GUTS FFQs, respectively. Over 70 % of food items from all cohorts were assigned to a NOVA group after stage 2. The remainder were shortlisted for further discussion (stage 3). After two rounds of reviews at stage 4, 95⋅6 % of food items (NHS + HPFS) and 90⋅7 % items (GUTS) were categorised. The remaining products were assigned to a non-ultra-processed food group (primary categorisation) and flagged for sensitivity analyses at which point they would be categorised as ultra-processed. Of all items in the food lists, 36⋅1 % in the NHS and HPFS cohorts and 43⋅5 % in the GUTS cohorts were identified as ultra-processed. Future work is needed to validate this approach. Documentation and discussions of alternative approaches for categorisation are encouraged. Cambridge University Press 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8453454/ /pubmed/34589209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jns.2021.72 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Khandpur, Neha
Rossato, Sinara
Drouin-Chartier, Jean-Philippe
Du, Mengxi
Steele, Euridice M.
Sampson, Laura
Monteiro, Carlos
Zhang, Fang F.
Willett, Walter
Fung, Teresa T.
Sun, Qi
Categorising ultra-processed foods in large-scale cohort studies: evidence from the Nurses’ Health Studies, the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, and the Growing Up Today Study
title Categorising ultra-processed foods in large-scale cohort studies: evidence from the Nurses’ Health Studies, the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, and the Growing Up Today Study
title_full Categorising ultra-processed foods in large-scale cohort studies: evidence from the Nurses’ Health Studies, the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, and the Growing Up Today Study
title_fullStr Categorising ultra-processed foods in large-scale cohort studies: evidence from the Nurses’ Health Studies, the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, and the Growing Up Today Study
title_full_unstemmed Categorising ultra-processed foods in large-scale cohort studies: evidence from the Nurses’ Health Studies, the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, and the Growing Up Today Study
title_short Categorising ultra-processed foods in large-scale cohort studies: evidence from the Nurses’ Health Studies, the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, and the Growing Up Today Study
title_sort categorising ultra-processed foods in large-scale cohort studies: evidence from the nurses’ health studies, the health professionals follow-up study, and the growing up today study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34589209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jns.2021.72
work_keys_str_mv AT khandpurneha categorisingultraprocessedfoodsinlargescalecohortstudiesevidencefromthenurseshealthstudiesthehealthprofessionalsfollowupstudyandthegrowinguptodaystudy
AT rossatosinara categorisingultraprocessedfoodsinlargescalecohortstudiesevidencefromthenurseshealthstudiesthehealthprofessionalsfollowupstudyandthegrowinguptodaystudy
AT drouinchartierjeanphilippe categorisingultraprocessedfoodsinlargescalecohortstudiesevidencefromthenurseshealthstudiesthehealthprofessionalsfollowupstudyandthegrowinguptodaystudy
AT dumengxi categorisingultraprocessedfoodsinlargescalecohortstudiesevidencefromthenurseshealthstudiesthehealthprofessionalsfollowupstudyandthegrowinguptodaystudy
AT steeleeuridicem categorisingultraprocessedfoodsinlargescalecohortstudiesevidencefromthenurseshealthstudiesthehealthprofessionalsfollowupstudyandthegrowinguptodaystudy
AT sampsonlaura categorisingultraprocessedfoodsinlargescalecohortstudiesevidencefromthenurseshealthstudiesthehealthprofessionalsfollowupstudyandthegrowinguptodaystudy
AT monteirocarlos categorisingultraprocessedfoodsinlargescalecohortstudiesevidencefromthenurseshealthstudiesthehealthprofessionalsfollowupstudyandthegrowinguptodaystudy
AT zhangfangf categorisingultraprocessedfoodsinlargescalecohortstudiesevidencefromthenurseshealthstudiesthehealthprofessionalsfollowupstudyandthegrowinguptodaystudy
AT willettwalter categorisingultraprocessedfoodsinlargescalecohortstudiesevidencefromthenurseshealthstudiesthehealthprofessionalsfollowupstudyandthegrowinguptodaystudy
AT fungteresat categorisingultraprocessedfoodsinlargescalecohortstudiesevidencefromthenurseshealthstudiesthehealthprofessionalsfollowupstudyandthegrowinguptodaystudy
AT sunqi categorisingultraprocessedfoodsinlargescalecohortstudiesevidencefromthenurseshealthstudiesthehealthprofessionalsfollowupstudyandthegrowinguptodaystudy