Cargando…

Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals

Agronomically important cereal crops wheat, barley, and rye of the Triticeace tribe under the genus Triticum were studied with special focus on their physical, proximal, and technological characteristics which are linked to their end product utilization. The physiochemical parameters showed variabil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rani, Monika, Singh, Gagandeep, Siddiqi, Raashid Ahmad, Gill, Balmeet Singh, Sogi, Dalbir Singh, Bhat, Mohd Akbar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34604274
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.694679
_version_ 1784576725114421248
author Rani, Monika
Singh, Gagandeep
Siddiqi, Raashid Ahmad
Gill, Balmeet Singh
Sogi, Dalbir Singh
Bhat, Mohd Akbar
author_facet Rani, Monika
Singh, Gagandeep
Siddiqi, Raashid Ahmad
Gill, Balmeet Singh
Sogi, Dalbir Singh
Bhat, Mohd Akbar
author_sort Rani, Monika
collection PubMed
description Agronomically important cereal crops wheat, barley, and rye of the Triticeace tribe under the genus Triticum were studied with special focus on their physical, proximal, and technological characteristics which are linked to their end product utilization. The physiochemical parameters showed variability among the three cereal grains. Lactic acid-solvent retention capacity (SRC) was found to be higher in wheat (95.86–111.92%) as compared to rye (53.78–67.97%) and barley (50.24–67.12%) cultivars, indicating higher gluten strength. Sucrose-SRC and sodium carbonate-SRC were higher in rye as compared to wheat and barley flours. The essential amino acid proportion in barley and rye cultivars was higher as compared to wheat cultivars. Barley and rye flours exhibited higher biological value (BV) owing to their higher lysine content. SDS-PAGE of wheat cultivars showed a high degree of polymorphism in the low molecular range of 27.03–45.24 kDa as compared to barley and rye cultivars. High molecular weight (HMW) proteins varied from 68.38 to 119.66 kDa (4–5 subunits) in wheat, 82.33 to 117.78 kDa (4 subunits) in rye, and 73.08 to 108.57 kDa (2–4 subunits) in barley. The comparative evaluation of barley and rye with wheat cultivars would help in the development of healthy food products.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8481659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84816592021-10-01 Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals Rani, Monika Singh, Gagandeep Siddiqi, Raashid Ahmad Gill, Balmeet Singh Sogi, Dalbir Singh Bhat, Mohd Akbar Front Nutr Nutrition Agronomically important cereal crops wheat, barley, and rye of the Triticeace tribe under the genus Triticum were studied with special focus on their physical, proximal, and technological characteristics which are linked to their end product utilization. The physiochemical parameters showed variability among the three cereal grains. Lactic acid-solvent retention capacity (SRC) was found to be higher in wheat (95.86–111.92%) as compared to rye (53.78–67.97%) and barley (50.24–67.12%) cultivars, indicating higher gluten strength. Sucrose-SRC and sodium carbonate-SRC were higher in rye as compared to wheat and barley flours. The essential amino acid proportion in barley and rye cultivars was higher as compared to wheat cultivars. Barley and rye flours exhibited higher biological value (BV) owing to their higher lysine content. SDS-PAGE of wheat cultivars showed a high degree of polymorphism in the low molecular range of 27.03–45.24 kDa as compared to barley and rye cultivars. High molecular weight (HMW) proteins varied from 68.38 to 119.66 kDa (4–5 subunits) in wheat, 82.33 to 117.78 kDa (4 subunits) in rye, and 73.08 to 108.57 kDa (2–4 subunits) in barley. The comparative evaluation of barley and rye with wheat cultivars would help in the development of healthy food products. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8481659/ /pubmed/34604274 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.694679 Text en Copyright © 2021 Rani, Singh, Siddiqi, Gill, Sogi and Bhat. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Rani, Monika
Singh, Gagandeep
Siddiqi, Raashid Ahmad
Gill, Balmeet Singh
Sogi, Dalbir Singh
Bhat, Mohd Akbar
Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals
title Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals
title_full Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals
title_fullStr Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals
title_short Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals
title_sort comparative quality evaluation of physicochemical, technological, and protein profiling of wheat, rye, and barley cereals
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34604274
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.694679
work_keys_str_mv AT ranimonika comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals
AT singhgagandeep comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals
AT siddiqiraashidahmad comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals
AT gillbalmeetsingh comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals
AT sogidalbirsingh comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals
AT bhatmohdakbar comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals