Cargando…
Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals
Agronomically important cereal crops wheat, barley, and rye of the Triticeace tribe under the genus Triticum were studied with special focus on their physical, proximal, and technological characteristics which are linked to their end product utilization. The physiochemical parameters showed variabil...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34604274 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.694679 |
_version_ | 1784576725114421248 |
---|---|
author | Rani, Monika Singh, Gagandeep Siddiqi, Raashid Ahmad Gill, Balmeet Singh Sogi, Dalbir Singh Bhat, Mohd Akbar |
author_facet | Rani, Monika Singh, Gagandeep Siddiqi, Raashid Ahmad Gill, Balmeet Singh Sogi, Dalbir Singh Bhat, Mohd Akbar |
author_sort | Rani, Monika |
collection | PubMed |
description | Agronomically important cereal crops wheat, barley, and rye of the Triticeace tribe under the genus Triticum were studied with special focus on their physical, proximal, and technological characteristics which are linked to their end product utilization. The physiochemical parameters showed variability among the three cereal grains. Lactic acid-solvent retention capacity (SRC) was found to be higher in wheat (95.86–111.92%) as compared to rye (53.78–67.97%) and barley (50.24–67.12%) cultivars, indicating higher gluten strength. Sucrose-SRC and sodium carbonate-SRC were higher in rye as compared to wheat and barley flours. The essential amino acid proportion in barley and rye cultivars was higher as compared to wheat cultivars. Barley and rye flours exhibited higher biological value (BV) owing to their higher lysine content. SDS-PAGE of wheat cultivars showed a high degree of polymorphism in the low molecular range of 27.03–45.24 kDa as compared to barley and rye cultivars. High molecular weight (HMW) proteins varied from 68.38 to 119.66 kDa (4–5 subunits) in wheat, 82.33 to 117.78 kDa (4 subunits) in rye, and 73.08 to 108.57 kDa (2–4 subunits) in barley. The comparative evaluation of barley and rye with wheat cultivars would help in the development of healthy food products. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8481659 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84816592021-10-01 Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals Rani, Monika Singh, Gagandeep Siddiqi, Raashid Ahmad Gill, Balmeet Singh Sogi, Dalbir Singh Bhat, Mohd Akbar Front Nutr Nutrition Agronomically important cereal crops wheat, barley, and rye of the Triticeace tribe under the genus Triticum were studied with special focus on their physical, proximal, and technological characteristics which are linked to their end product utilization. The physiochemical parameters showed variability among the three cereal grains. Lactic acid-solvent retention capacity (SRC) was found to be higher in wheat (95.86–111.92%) as compared to rye (53.78–67.97%) and barley (50.24–67.12%) cultivars, indicating higher gluten strength. Sucrose-SRC and sodium carbonate-SRC were higher in rye as compared to wheat and barley flours. The essential amino acid proportion in barley and rye cultivars was higher as compared to wheat cultivars. Barley and rye flours exhibited higher biological value (BV) owing to their higher lysine content. SDS-PAGE of wheat cultivars showed a high degree of polymorphism in the low molecular range of 27.03–45.24 kDa as compared to barley and rye cultivars. High molecular weight (HMW) proteins varied from 68.38 to 119.66 kDa (4–5 subunits) in wheat, 82.33 to 117.78 kDa (4 subunits) in rye, and 73.08 to 108.57 kDa (2–4 subunits) in barley. The comparative evaluation of barley and rye with wheat cultivars would help in the development of healthy food products. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8481659/ /pubmed/34604274 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.694679 Text en Copyright © 2021 Rani, Singh, Siddiqi, Gill, Sogi and Bhat. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Nutrition Rani, Monika Singh, Gagandeep Siddiqi, Raashid Ahmad Gill, Balmeet Singh Sogi, Dalbir Singh Bhat, Mohd Akbar Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals |
title | Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals |
title_full | Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals |
title_fullStr | Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals |
title_short | Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals |
title_sort | comparative quality evaluation of physicochemical, technological, and protein profiling of wheat, rye, and barley cereals |
topic | Nutrition |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34604274 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.694679 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ranimonika comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals AT singhgagandeep comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals AT siddiqiraashidahmad comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals AT gillbalmeetsingh comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals AT sogidalbirsingh comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals AT bhatmohdakbar comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals |