Cargando…

Impact of different work organizational models on gender differences in exposure to psychosocial and ergonomic hazards at work and in mental and physical health

PURPOSE: To examine differences between genders in exposure to psychosocial and ergonomic factors at work and in work-related health, according to different work organization models. METHODS: The study population included a sample of 9749 (women: 37.1%) and 10,374 (women: 39.9%) employees who partic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Migliore, Maria Cristina, Ricceri, Fulvio, Lazzarato, Fulvio, d’Errico, Angelo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8490231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34050822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-021-01720-z
_version_ 1784578488358928384
author Migliore, Maria Cristina
Ricceri, Fulvio
Lazzarato, Fulvio
d’Errico, Angelo
author_facet Migliore, Maria Cristina
Ricceri, Fulvio
Lazzarato, Fulvio
d’Errico, Angelo
author_sort Migliore, Maria Cristina
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To examine differences between genders in exposure to psychosocial and ergonomic factors at work and in work-related health, according to different work organization models. METHODS: The study population included a sample of 9749 (women: 37.1%) and 10,374 (women: 39.9%) employees who participated in the 2010 and 2015 European Working Conditions Surveys, respectively. Multiple Correspondence Analysis was applied to work characteristics reported by workers to estimate principal components, followed by Hierarchical Clustering on principal components to identify clusters of work organization models. Gender differences in exposure to work hazards and health outcomes were assessed through Poisson robust regression. Differences of PRs across organizational models were tested through interaction between gender and type of work organization. RESULTS: Three organizational models were identified in 2010, including lean production, Tayloristic production, and a “reflexive production” model, whereas in 2015, a “simple” or traditional model was also found. In 2010, women employed in companies adopting the Tayloristic or the lean production models were more likely than men to be exposed to unfavourable psychosocial and physical work factors, and to report musculoskeletal pain, compared to those belonging to reflexive production. In 2015, a significantly higher female/male ratio persisted in lean production for exposure to high job strain and for carrying/moving heavy loads, whereas gender differences in Tayloristic and traditional production were quite similar to those of reflexive production. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that employment in workplaces characterized by lower monotony, repetitiveness, and production constraints may contribute to reduce exposure to job strain among working women. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00420-021-01720-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8490231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84902312021-10-15 Impact of different work organizational models on gender differences in exposure to psychosocial and ergonomic hazards at work and in mental and physical health Migliore, Maria Cristina Ricceri, Fulvio Lazzarato, Fulvio d’Errico, Angelo Int Arch Occup Environ Health Original Article PURPOSE: To examine differences between genders in exposure to psychosocial and ergonomic factors at work and in work-related health, according to different work organization models. METHODS: The study population included a sample of 9749 (women: 37.1%) and 10,374 (women: 39.9%) employees who participated in the 2010 and 2015 European Working Conditions Surveys, respectively. Multiple Correspondence Analysis was applied to work characteristics reported by workers to estimate principal components, followed by Hierarchical Clustering on principal components to identify clusters of work organization models. Gender differences in exposure to work hazards and health outcomes were assessed through Poisson robust regression. Differences of PRs across organizational models were tested through interaction between gender and type of work organization. RESULTS: Three organizational models were identified in 2010, including lean production, Tayloristic production, and a “reflexive production” model, whereas in 2015, a “simple” or traditional model was also found. In 2010, women employed in companies adopting the Tayloristic or the lean production models were more likely than men to be exposed to unfavourable psychosocial and physical work factors, and to report musculoskeletal pain, compared to those belonging to reflexive production. In 2015, a significantly higher female/male ratio persisted in lean production for exposure to high job strain and for carrying/moving heavy loads, whereas gender differences in Tayloristic and traditional production were quite similar to those of reflexive production. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that employment in workplaces characterized by lower monotony, repetitiveness, and production constraints may contribute to reduce exposure to job strain among working women. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00420-021-01720-z. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-29 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8490231/ /pubmed/34050822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-021-01720-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Migliore, Maria Cristina
Ricceri, Fulvio
Lazzarato, Fulvio
d’Errico, Angelo
Impact of different work organizational models on gender differences in exposure to psychosocial and ergonomic hazards at work and in mental and physical health
title Impact of different work organizational models on gender differences in exposure to psychosocial and ergonomic hazards at work and in mental and physical health
title_full Impact of different work organizational models on gender differences in exposure to psychosocial and ergonomic hazards at work and in mental and physical health
title_fullStr Impact of different work organizational models on gender differences in exposure to psychosocial and ergonomic hazards at work and in mental and physical health
title_full_unstemmed Impact of different work organizational models on gender differences in exposure to psychosocial and ergonomic hazards at work and in mental and physical health
title_short Impact of different work organizational models on gender differences in exposure to psychosocial and ergonomic hazards at work and in mental and physical health
title_sort impact of different work organizational models on gender differences in exposure to psychosocial and ergonomic hazards at work and in mental and physical health
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8490231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34050822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-021-01720-z
work_keys_str_mv AT miglioremariacristina impactofdifferentworkorganizationalmodelsongenderdifferencesinexposuretopsychosocialandergonomichazardsatworkandinmentalandphysicalhealth
AT riccerifulvio impactofdifferentworkorganizationalmodelsongenderdifferencesinexposuretopsychosocialandergonomichazardsatworkandinmentalandphysicalhealth
AT lazzaratofulvio impactofdifferentworkorganizationalmodelsongenderdifferencesinexposuretopsychosocialandergonomichazardsatworkandinmentalandphysicalhealth
AT derricoangelo impactofdifferentworkorganizationalmodelsongenderdifferencesinexposuretopsychosocialandergonomichazardsatworkandinmentalandphysicalhealth