Cargando…
Evaluating the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular physical examination in third-year medical students: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial
Background: Previous research suggests that cardiac examination skills in undergraduate medical students frequently need improvement. There are different ways to enhance physical examination (PE) skills such as simulator-based training or peer-assisted learning (PAL). Aim: The aim of this study was...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34651066 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001504 |
_version_ | 1784579198071865344 |
---|---|
author | Kronschnabl, David M. Baerwald, Christoph Rotzoll, Daisy E. |
author_facet | Kronschnabl, David M. Baerwald, Christoph Rotzoll, Daisy E. |
author_sort | Kronschnabl, David M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Previous research suggests that cardiac examination skills in undergraduate medical students frequently need improvement. There are different ways to enhance physical examination (PE) skills such as simulator-based training or peer-assisted learning (PAL). Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular PE. Methods: Participants were third-year medical students at Leipzig University Faculty of Medicine. Students were randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG) and a control group (CG). In addition to standard curricular training, IG received a peer-led, simulator-based training in cardiac PE. Participant performance in cardiac PE was assessed using a standardized checklist with a maximum of 25 points. Primary outcome was assessed via checklist point distribution. Results: 89 students were randomised to either CG (n=43) or IG (n=46) with 70 completing the study. Overall, IG students performed significantly better than CG students did (max. points: 25, M±SD in IG was 17±3, in CG 12±4, p<.0001). Simple mistakes such as not using the stethoscope correctly were more frequent in CG students. Prior experience did not lead to a significant difference in performance. Conclusions: Structured, peer-led and simulator-assisted teaching sessions improve cardiac PE skills in this setting compared to control students that did not receive this training. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8493837 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | German Medical Science GMS Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84938372021-10-13 Evaluating the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular physical examination in third-year medical students: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial Kronschnabl, David M. Baerwald, Christoph Rotzoll, Daisy E. GMS J Med Educ Article Background: Previous research suggests that cardiac examination skills in undergraduate medical students frequently need improvement. There are different ways to enhance physical examination (PE) skills such as simulator-based training or peer-assisted learning (PAL). Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular PE. Methods: Participants were third-year medical students at Leipzig University Faculty of Medicine. Students were randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG) and a control group (CG). In addition to standard curricular training, IG received a peer-led, simulator-based training in cardiac PE. Participant performance in cardiac PE was assessed using a standardized checklist with a maximum of 25 points. Primary outcome was assessed via checklist point distribution. Results: 89 students were randomised to either CG (n=43) or IG (n=46) with 70 completing the study. Overall, IG students performed significantly better than CG students did (max. points: 25, M±SD in IG was 17±3, in CG 12±4, p<.0001). Simple mistakes such as not using the stethoscope correctly were more frequent in CG students. Prior experience did not lead to a significant difference in performance. Conclusions: Structured, peer-led and simulator-assisted teaching sessions improve cardiac PE skills in this setting compared to control students that did not receive this training. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2021-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8493837/ /pubmed/34651066 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001504 Text en Copyright © 2021 Kronschnabl et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Kronschnabl, David M. Baerwald, Christoph Rotzoll, Daisy E. Evaluating the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular physical examination in third-year medical students: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial |
title | Evaluating the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular physical examination in third-year medical students: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial |
title_full | Evaluating the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular physical examination in third-year medical students: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular physical examination in third-year medical students: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular physical examination in third-year medical students: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial |
title_short | Evaluating the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular physical examination in third-year medical students: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial |
title_sort | evaluating the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular physical examination in third-year medical students: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34651066 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001504 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kronschnabldavidm evaluatingtheeffectivenessofastructuredsimulatorassistedpeerledtrainingoncardiovascularphysicalexaminationinthirdyearmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT baerwaldchristoph evaluatingtheeffectivenessofastructuredsimulatorassistedpeerledtrainingoncardiovascularphysicalexaminationinthirdyearmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rotzolldaisye evaluatingtheeffectivenessofastructuredsimulatorassistedpeerledtrainingoncardiovascularphysicalexaminationinthirdyearmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial |