Cargando…

Evaluating the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular physical examination in third-year medical students: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial

Background: Previous research suggests that cardiac examination skills in undergraduate medical students frequently need improvement. There are different ways to enhance physical examination (PE) skills such as simulator-based training or peer-assisted learning (PAL). Aim: The aim of this study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kronschnabl, David M., Baerwald, Christoph, Rotzoll, Daisy E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34651066
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001504
_version_ 1784579198071865344
author Kronschnabl, David M.
Baerwald, Christoph
Rotzoll, Daisy E.
author_facet Kronschnabl, David M.
Baerwald, Christoph
Rotzoll, Daisy E.
author_sort Kronschnabl, David M.
collection PubMed
description Background: Previous research suggests that cardiac examination skills in undergraduate medical students frequently need improvement. There are different ways to enhance physical examination (PE) skills such as simulator-based training or peer-assisted learning (PAL). Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular PE. Methods: Participants were third-year medical students at Leipzig University Faculty of Medicine. Students were randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG) and a control group (CG). In addition to standard curricular training, IG received a peer-led, simulator-based training in cardiac PE. Participant performance in cardiac PE was assessed using a standardized checklist with a maximum of 25 points. Primary outcome was assessed via checklist point distribution. Results: 89 students were randomised to either CG (n=43) or IG (n=46) with 70 completing the study. Overall, IG students performed significantly better than CG students did (max. points: 25, M±SD in IG was 17±3, in CG 12±4, p<.0001). Simple mistakes such as not using the stethoscope correctly were more frequent in CG students. Prior experience did not lead to a significant difference in performance. Conclusions: Structured, peer-led and simulator-assisted teaching sessions improve cardiac PE skills in this setting compared to control students that did not receive this training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8493837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84938372021-10-13 Evaluating the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular physical examination in third-year medical students: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial Kronschnabl, David M. Baerwald, Christoph Rotzoll, Daisy E. GMS J Med Educ Article Background: Previous research suggests that cardiac examination skills in undergraduate medical students frequently need improvement. There are different ways to enhance physical examination (PE) skills such as simulator-based training or peer-assisted learning (PAL). Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular PE. Methods: Participants were third-year medical students at Leipzig University Faculty of Medicine. Students were randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG) and a control group (CG). In addition to standard curricular training, IG received a peer-led, simulator-based training in cardiac PE. Participant performance in cardiac PE was assessed using a standardized checklist with a maximum of 25 points. Primary outcome was assessed via checklist point distribution. Results: 89 students were randomised to either CG (n=43) or IG (n=46) with 70 completing the study. Overall, IG students performed significantly better than CG students did (max. points: 25, M±SD in IG was 17±3, in CG 12±4, p<.0001). Simple mistakes such as not using the stethoscope correctly were more frequent in CG students. Prior experience did not lead to a significant difference in performance. Conclusions: Structured, peer-led and simulator-assisted teaching sessions improve cardiac PE skills in this setting compared to control students that did not receive this training. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2021-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8493837/ /pubmed/34651066 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001504 Text en Copyright © 2021 Kronschnabl et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kronschnabl, David M.
Baerwald, Christoph
Rotzoll, Daisy E.
Evaluating the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular physical examination in third-year medical students: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial
title Evaluating the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular physical examination in third-year medical students: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial
title_full Evaluating the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular physical examination in third-year medical students: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial
title_fullStr Evaluating the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular physical examination in third-year medical students: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular physical examination in third-year medical students: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial
title_short Evaluating the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular physical examination in third-year medical students: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial
title_sort evaluating the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular physical examination in third-year medical students: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34651066
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001504
work_keys_str_mv AT kronschnabldavidm evaluatingtheeffectivenessofastructuredsimulatorassistedpeerledtrainingoncardiovascularphysicalexaminationinthirdyearmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT baerwaldchristoph evaluatingtheeffectivenessofastructuredsimulatorassistedpeerledtrainingoncardiovascularphysicalexaminationinthirdyearmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rotzolldaisye evaluatingtheeffectivenessofastructuredsimulatorassistedpeerledtrainingoncardiovascularphysicalexaminationinthirdyearmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial