Cargando…
Students’ view on supportive co-teaching in medical sciences: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Supportive co-teaching (SCT) is the practice of employing two or more experts whose knowledge and experiences are needed simultaneously to make a connection across different disciplines in a classroom. Although this interdisciplinary approach seems to be beneficial, there are many featur...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8495958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34615507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02958-4 |
_version_ | 1784579659249221632 |
---|---|
author | Dehnad, Afsaneh Jalali, Maryam Shahabi, Saeed Mojgani, Parviz Bigdeli, Shoaleh |
author_facet | Dehnad, Afsaneh Jalali, Maryam Shahabi, Saeed Mojgani, Parviz Bigdeli, Shoaleh |
author_sort | Dehnad, Afsaneh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Supportive co-teaching (SCT) is the practice of employing two or more experts whose knowledge and experiences are needed simultaneously to make a connection across different disciplines in a classroom. Although this interdisciplinary approach seems to be beneficial, there are many features which need further examination. This study was conducted to systematically review studies addressing the use of this approach and learners’ views on SCT in medical sciences. METHODS: We searched for the studies addressing students’ views on SCT in medical sciences from January1(st) 2000 to June 31st, 2019. All the studies, both quantitative and qualitative published in English language, investigating the students’ views on SCT, in non-clinical courses in the setting of medical sciences were included. We searched electronic databases of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, WHO Global Health Library, Health Systems Evidence, and ERIC with the keywords and phrases related to the topic which were: “co-teaching”, “team teaching”, “collaborative teaching”, “peer-to-peer co-teaching”, “partnership teaching”, and“ teacher collaboration”. RESULTS: By the initial search, 9806 studies were found and after deletion of duplicates and screening, 111 remained for selection. Upon the independent review by two researchers, we were able to discern 12 studies eligible to be included for data extraction. All the studies reported positive views of the students towards SCT although some identified concerns and drawbacks. The students stated that they could better perceive the relationship between basic and clinical sciences, were more engaged in the learning process, and their learning experience was optimized in a course directed by SCT. CONCLUSION: Overall, the students showed positive views of this approach of teaching, and their grades indicated they learned better than expected. However, mismatch and lack of coordination between instructors would make the class distracting, confusing and even disturbing. Further studies investigating different variables related to teachers and students in SCT classes are suggested. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8495958 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84959582021-10-07 Students’ view on supportive co-teaching in medical sciences: a systematic review Dehnad, Afsaneh Jalali, Maryam Shahabi, Saeed Mojgani, Parviz Bigdeli, Shoaleh BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Supportive co-teaching (SCT) is the practice of employing two or more experts whose knowledge and experiences are needed simultaneously to make a connection across different disciplines in a classroom. Although this interdisciplinary approach seems to be beneficial, there are many features which need further examination. This study was conducted to systematically review studies addressing the use of this approach and learners’ views on SCT in medical sciences. METHODS: We searched for the studies addressing students’ views on SCT in medical sciences from January1(st) 2000 to June 31st, 2019. All the studies, both quantitative and qualitative published in English language, investigating the students’ views on SCT, in non-clinical courses in the setting of medical sciences were included. We searched electronic databases of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, WHO Global Health Library, Health Systems Evidence, and ERIC with the keywords and phrases related to the topic which were: “co-teaching”, “team teaching”, “collaborative teaching”, “peer-to-peer co-teaching”, “partnership teaching”, and“ teacher collaboration”. RESULTS: By the initial search, 9806 studies were found and after deletion of duplicates and screening, 111 remained for selection. Upon the independent review by two researchers, we were able to discern 12 studies eligible to be included for data extraction. All the studies reported positive views of the students towards SCT although some identified concerns and drawbacks. The students stated that they could better perceive the relationship between basic and clinical sciences, were more engaged in the learning process, and their learning experience was optimized in a course directed by SCT. CONCLUSION: Overall, the students showed positive views of this approach of teaching, and their grades indicated they learned better than expected. However, mismatch and lack of coordination between instructors would make the class distracting, confusing and even disturbing. Further studies investigating different variables related to teachers and students in SCT classes are suggested. BioMed Central 2021-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8495958/ /pubmed/34615507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02958-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Dehnad, Afsaneh Jalali, Maryam Shahabi, Saeed Mojgani, Parviz Bigdeli, Shoaleh Students’ view on supportive co-teaching in medical sciences: a systematic review |
title | Students’ view on supportive co-teaching in medical sciences: a systematic review |
title_full | Students’ view on supportive co-teaching in medical sciences: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Students’ view on supportive co-teaching in medical sciences: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Students’ view on supportive co-teaching in medical sciences: a systematic review |
title_short | Students’ view on supportive co-teaching in medical sciences: a systematic review |
title_sort | students’ view on supportive co-teaching in medical sciences: a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8495958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34615507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02958-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dehnadafsaneh studentsviewonsupportivecoteachinginmedicalsciencesasystematicreview AT jalalimaryam studentsviewonsupportivecoteachinginmedicalsciencesasystematicreview AT shahabisaeed studentsviewonsupportivecoteachinginmedicalsciencesasystematicreview AT mojganiparviz studentsviewonsupportivecoteachinginmedicalsciencesasystematicreview AT bigdelishoaleh studentsviewonsupportivecoteachinginmedicalsciencesasystematicreview |