Cargando…
Persistent DNA damage signaling and DNA polymerase theta promote broken chromosome segregation
Cycling cells must respond to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) to avoid genome instability. Missegregation of chromosomes with DSBs during mitosis results in micronuclei, aberrant structures linked to disease. How cells respond to DSBs during mitosis is incompletely understood. We previously showed t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Rockefeller University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34613334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202106116 |
_version_ | 1784580406837772288 |
---|---|
author | Clay, Delisa E. Bretscher, Heidi S. Jezuit, Erin A. Bush, Korie B. Fox, Donald T. |
author_facet | Clay, Delisa E. Bretscher, Heidi S. Jezuit, Erin A. Bush, Korie B. Fox, Donald T. |
author_sort | Clay, Delisa E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cycling cells must respond to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) to avoid genome instability. Missegregation of chromosomes with DSBs during mitosis results in micronuclei, aberrant structures linked to disease. How cells respond to DSBs during mitosis is incompletely understood. We previously showed that Drosophila melanogaster papillar cells lack DSB checkpoints (as observed in many cancer cells). Here, we show that papillar cells still recruit early acting repair machinery (Mre11 and RPA3) and the Fanconi anemia (FA) protein Fancd2 to DSBs. These proteins persist as foci on DSBs as cells enter mitosis. Repair foci are resolved in a stepwise manner during mitosis. DSB repair kinetics depends on both monoubiquitination of Fancd2 and the alternative end-joining protein DNA polymerase θ. Disruption of either or both of these factors causes micronuclei after DNA damage, which disrupts intestinal organogenesis. This study reveals a mechanism for how cells with inactive DSB checkpoints can respond to DNA damage that persists into mitosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8500225 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Rockefeller University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85002252022-06-06 Persistent DNA damage signaling and DNA polymerase theta promote broken chromosome segregation Clay, Delisa E. Bretscher, Heidi S. Jezuit, Erin A. Bush, Korie B. Fox, Donald T. J Cell Biol Article Cycling cells must respond to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) to avoid genome instability. Missegregation of chromosomes with DSBs during mitosis results in micronuclei, aberrant structures linked to disease. How cells respond to DSBs during mitosis is incompletely understood. We previously showed that Drosophila melanogaster papillar cells lack DSB checkpoints (as observed in many cancer cells). Here, we show that papillar cells still recruit early acting repair machinery (Mre11 and RPA3) and the Fanconi anemia (FA) protein Fancd2 to DSBs. These proteins persist as foci on DSBs as cells enter mitosis. Repair foci are resolved in a stepwise manner during mitosis. DSB repair kinetics depends on both monoubiquitination of Fancd2 and the alternative end-joining protein DNA polymerase θ. Disruption of either or both of these factors causes micronuclei after DNA damage, which disrupts intestinal organogenesis. This study reveals a mechanism for how cells with inactive DSB checkpoints can respond to DNA damage that persists into mitosis. Rockefeller University Press 2021-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8500225/ /pubmed/34613334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202106116 Text en © 2021 Clay et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/http://www.rupress.org/terms/This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms/). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 International license, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Clay, Delisa E. Bretscher, Heidi S. Jezuit, Erin A. Bush, Korie B. Fox, Donald T. Persistent DNA damage signaling and DNA polymerase theta promote broken chromosome segregation |
title | Persistent DNA damage signaling and DNA polymerase theta promote broken chromosome segregation |
title_full | Persistent DNA damage signaling and DNA polymerase theta promote broken chromosome segregation |
title_fullStr | Persistent DNA damage signaling and DNA polymerase theta promote broken chromosome segregation |
title_full_unstemmed | Persistent DNA damage signaling and DNA polymerase theta promote broken chromosome segregation |
title_short | Persistent DNA damage signaling and DNA polymerase theta promote broken chromosome segregation |
title_sort | persistent dna damage signaling and dna polymerase theta promote broken chromosome segregation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34613334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202106116 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT claydelisae persistentdnadamagesignalinganddnapolymerasethetapromotebrokenchromosomesegregation AT bretscherheidis persistentdnadamagesignalinganddnapolymerasethetapromotebrokenchromosomesegregation AT jezuiterina persistentdnadamagesignalinganddnapolymerasethetapromotebrokenchromosomesegregation AT bushkorieb persistentdnadamagesignalinganddnapolymerasethetapromotebrokenchromosomesegregation AT foxdonaldt persistentdnadamagesignalinganddnapolymerasethetapromotebrokenchromosomesegregation |