Cargando…

Persistent DNA damage signaling and DNA polymerase theta promote broken chromosome segregation

Cycling cells must respond to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) to avoid genome instability. Missegregation of chromosomes with DSBs during mitosis results in micronuclei, aberrant structures linked to disease. How cells respond to DSBs during mitosis is incompletely understood. We previously showed t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clay, Delisa E., Bretscher, Heidi S., Jezuit, Erin A., Bush, Korie B., Fox, Donald T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Rockefeller University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34613334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202106116
_version_ 1784580406837772288
author Clay, Delisa E.
Bretscher, Heidi S.
Jezuit, Erin A.
Bush, Korie B.
Fox, Donald T.
author_facet Clay, Delisa E.
Bretscher, Heidi S.
Jezuit, Erin A.
Bush, Korie B.
Fox, Donald T.
author_sort Clay, Delisa E.
collection PubMed
description Cycling cells must respond to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) to avoid genome instability. Missegregation of chromosomes with DSBs during mitosis results in micronuclei, aberrant structures linked to disease. How cells respond to DSBs during mitosis is incompletely understood. We previously showed that Drosophila melanogaster papillar cells lack DSB checkpoints (as observed in many cancer cells). Here, we show that papillar cells still recruit early acting repair machinery (Mre11 and RPA3) and the Fanconi anemia (FA) protein Fancd2 to DSBs. These proteins persist as foci on DSBs as cells enter mitosis. Repair foci are resolved in a stepwise manner during mitosis. DSB repair kinetics depends on both monoubiquitination of Fancd2 and the alternative end-joining protein DNA polymerase θ. Disruption of either or both of these factors causes micronuclei after DNA damage, which disrupts intestinal organogenesis. This study reveals a mechanism for how cells with inactive DSB checkpoints can respond to DNA damage that persists into mitosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8500225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85002252022-06-06 Persistent DNA damage signaling and DNA polymerase theta promote broken chromosome segregation Clay, Delisa E. Bretscher, Heidi S. Jezuit, Erin A. Bush, Korie B. Fox, Donald T. J Cell Biol Article Cycling cells must respond to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) to avoid genome instability. Missegregation of chromosomes with DSBs during mitosis results in micronuclei, aberrant structures linked to disease. How cells respond to DSBs during mitosis is incompletely understood. We previously showed that Drosophila melanogaster papillar cells lack DSB checkpoints (as observed in many cancer cells). Here, we show that papillar cells still recruit early acting repair machinery (Mre11 and RPA3) and the Fanconi anemia (FA) protein Fancd2 to DSBs. These proteins persist as foci on DSBs as cells enter mitosis. Repair foci are resolved in a stepwise manner during mitosis. DSB repair kinetics depends on both monoubiquitination of Fancd2 and the alternative end-joining protein DNA polymerase θ. Disruption of either or both of these factors causes micronuclei after DNA damage, which disrupts intestinal organogenesis. This study reveals a mechanism for how cells with inactive DSB checkpoints can respond to DNA damage that persists into mitosis. Rockefeller University Press 2021-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8500225/ /pubmed/34613334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202106116 Text en © 2021 Clay et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/http://www.rupress.org/terms/This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms/). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 International license, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Clay, Delisa E.
Bretscher, Heidi S.
Jezuit, Erin A.
Bush, Korie B.
Fox, Donald T.
Persistent DNA damage signaling and DNA polymerase theta promote broken chromosome segregation
title Persistent DNA damage signaling and DNA polymerase theta promote broken chromosome segregation
title_full Persistent DNA damage signaling and DNA polymerase theta promote broken chromosome segregation
title_fullStr Persistent DNA damage signaling and DNA polymerase theta promote broken chromosome segregation
title_full_unstemmed Persistent DNA damage signaling and DNA polymerase theta promote broken chromosome segregation
title_short Persistent DNA damage signaling and DNA polymerase theta promote broken chromosome segregation
title_sort persistent dna damage signaling and dna polymerase theta promote broken chromosome segregation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34613334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202106116
work_keys_str_mv AT claydelisae persistentdnadamagesignalinganddnapolymerasethetapromotebrokenchromosomesegregation
AT bretscherheidis persistentdnadamagesignalinganddnapolymerasethetapromotebrokenchromosomesegregation
AT jezuiterina persistentdnadamagesignalinganddnapolymerasethetapromotebrokenchromosomesegregation
AT bushkorieb persistentdnadamagesignalinganddnapolymerasethetapromotebrokenchromosomesegregation
AT foxdonaldt persistentdnadamagesignalinganddnapolymerasethetapromotebrokenchromosomesegregation