Cargando…

Assessment of breathing in cardiac arrest: a randomised controlled trial of three teaching methods among laypersons

BACKGROUND: The aim of this trial was to compare a video- and a simulation-based teaching method to the conventional lecture-based method, hypothesizing that the video- and simulation-based teaching methods would lead to improved recognition of breathing patterns during cardiac arrest. METHODS: In t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Breindahl, Niklas, Granholm, Anders, Jensen, Theo Walther, Ersbøll, Annette Kjær, Myklebust, Helge, Lippert, Freddy, Lippert, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8502323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34627156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00513-4
_version_ 1784580873027321856
author Breindahl, Niklas
Granholm, Anders
Jensen, Theo Walther
Ersbøll, Annette Kjær
Myklebust, Helge
Lippert, Freddy
Lippert, Anne
author_facet Breindahl, Niklas
Granholm, Anders
Jensen, Theo Walther
Ersbøll, Annette Kjær
Myklebust, Helge
Lippert, Freddy
Lippert, Anne
author_sort Breindahl, Niklas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this trial was to compare a video- and a simulation-based teaching method to the conventional lecture-based method, hypothesizing that the video- and simulation-based teaching methods would lead to improved recognition of breathing patterns during cardiac arrest. METHODS: In this Danish, investigator-initiated, stratified, randomised controlled trial, adult laypersons (university students, military conscripts and elderly retirees) participating in European Resuscitation Council Basic Life Support courses were randomised to receive teaching on how to recognise breathing patterns using a lecture- (usual practice), a video-, or a simulation-based teaching method. The primary outcome was recognition of breathing patterns in nine videos of actors simulating normal breathing, no breathing, and agonal breathing (three of each). We analysed outcomes using logistic regression models and present results as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and P-values from likelihood ratio tests. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three participants were included in the analyses from February 2, 2018 through May 21, 2019 and recognition of breathing patterns was statistically significantly different between the teaching methods (P = 0.013). Compared to lecture-based teaching (83% correct answers), both video- (90% correct answers; OR 1.77, 95% CI: 1.19–2.64) and simulation-based teaching (88% correct answers; OR 1.48; 95% CI: 1.01–2.17) led to significantly more correct answers. Video-based teaching was not statistically significantly different compared to simulation-based teaching (OR 1.20; 95% CI: 0.78–1.83). CONCLUSION: Video- and simulation-based teaching methods led to improved recognition of breathing patterns among laypersons participating in adult Basic Life Support courses compared to the conventional lecture-based teaching method. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-021-00513-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8502323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85023232021-10-20 Assessment of breathing in cardiac arrest: a randomised controlled trial of three teaching methods among laypersons Breindahl, Niklas Granholm, Anders Jensen, Theo Walther Ersbøll, Annette Kjær Myklebust, Helge Lippert, Freddy Lippert, Anne BMC Emerg Med Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this trial was to compare a video- and a simulation-based teaching method to the conventional lecture-based method, hypothesizing that the video- and simulation-based teaching methods would lead to improved recognition of breathing patterns during cardiac arrest. METHODS: In this Danish, investigator-initiated, stratified, randomised controlled trial, adult laypersons (university students, military conscripts and elderly retirees) participating in European Resuscitation Council Basic Life Support courses were randomised to receive teaching on how to recognise breathing patterns using a lecture- (usual practice), a video-, or a simulation-based teaching method. The primary outcome was recognition of breathing patterns in nine videos of actors simulating normal breathing, no breathing, and agonal breathing (three of each). We analysed outcomes using logistic regression models and present results as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and P-values from likelihood ratio tests. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three participants were included in the analyses from February 2, 2018 through May 21, 2019 and recognition of breathing patterns was statistically significantly different between the teaching methods (P = 0.013). Compared to lecture-based teaching (83% correct answers), both video- (90% correct answers; OR 1.77, 95% CI: 1.19–2.64) and simulation-based teaching (88% correct answers; OR 1.48; 95% CI: 1.01–2.17) led to significantly more correct answers. Video-based teaching was not statistically significantly different compared to simulation-based teaching (OR 1.20; 95% CI: 0.78–1.83). CONCLUSION: Video- and simulation-based teaching methods led to improved recognition of breathing patterns among laypersons participating in adult Basic Life Support courses compared to the conventional lecture-based teaching method. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-021-00513-4. BioMed Central 2021-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8502323/ /pubmed/34627156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00513-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Breindahl, Niklas
Granholm, Anders
Jensen, Theo Walther
Ersbøll, Annette Kjær
Myklebust, Helge
Lippert, Freddy
Lippert, Anne
Assessment of breathing in cardiac arrest: a randomised controlled trial of three teaching methods among laypersons
title Assessment of breathing in cardiac arrest: a randomised controlled trial of three teaching methods among laypersons
title_full Assessment of breathing in cardiac arrest: a randomised controlled trial of three teaching methods among laypersons
title_fullStr Assessment of breathing in cardiac arrest: a randomised controlled trial of three teaching methods among laypersons
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of breathing in cardiac arrest: a randomised controlled trial of three teaching methods among laypersons
title_short Assessment of breathing in cardiac arrest: a randomised controlled trial of three teaching methods among laypersons
title_sort assessment of breathing in cardiac arrest: a randomised controlled trial of three teaching methods among laypersons
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8502323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34627156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00513-4
work_keys_str_mv AT breindahlniklas assessmentofbreathingincardiacarrestarandomisedcontrolledtrialofthreeteachingmethodsamonglaypersons
AT granholmanders assessmentofbreathingincardiacarrestarandomisedcontrolledtrialofthreeteachingmethodsamonglaypersons
AT jensentheowalther assessmentofbreathingincardiacarrestarandomisedcontrolledtrialofthreeteachingmethodsamonglaypersons
AT ersbøllannettekjær assessmentofbreathingincardiacarrestarandomisedcontrolledtrialofthreeteachingmethodsamonglaypersons
AT myklebusthelge assessmentofbreathingincardiacarrestarandomisedcontrolledtrialofthreeteachingmethodsamonglaypersons
AT lippertfreddy assessmentofbreathingincardiacarrestarandomisedcontrolledtrialofthreeteachingmethodsamonglaypersons
AT lippertanne assessmentofbreathingincardiacarrestarandomisedcontrolledtrialofthreeteachingmethodsamonglaypersons