Cargando…

Development of a Low-Cost Open-Source Measurement System for Joint Angle Estimation

The use of inertial measurement units (IMUs) is a low-cost alternative for measuring joint angles. This study aims to present a low-cost open-source measurement system for joint angle estimation. The system is modular and has hardware and software. The hardware was developed using a low-cost IMU and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Almeida, Túlio Fernandes, Morya, Edgard, Rodrigues, Abner Cardoso, de Azevedo Dantas, André Felipe Oliveira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8513086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640796
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21196477
Descripción
Sumario:The use of inertial measurement units (IMUs) is a low-cost alternative for measuring joint angles. This study aims to present a low-cost open-source measurement system for joint angle estimation. The system is modular and has hardware and software. The hardware was developed using a low-cost IMU and microcontroller. The IMU data analysis software was developed in Python and has three fusion filters: Complementary Filter, Kalman Filter, and Madgwick Filter. Three experiments were performed for the proof of concept of the system. First, we evaluated the knee joint of Lokomat, with a predefined average range of motion (ROM) of 60 [Formula: see text]. In the second, we evaluated our system in a real scenario, evaluating the knee of a healthy adult individual during gait. In the third experiment, we evaluated the software using data from gold standard devices, comparing the results of our software with Ground Truth. In the evaluation of the Lokomat, our system achieved an average ROM of 58.28 [Formula: see text] , and during evaluation in a real scenario it achieved an average ROM of 44.62 [Formula: see text]. In comparing our software with Ground Truth, we achieved a root-mean-square error of 0.04 and a mean average percentage error of 2.95%. These results encourage the use of this system in other scenarios.