Cargando…
Detection of Profenofos in Chinese Kale, Cabbage, and Chili Spur Pepper Using Fourier Transform Near-Infrared and Fourier Transform Mid-Infrared Spectroscopies
[Image: see text] Different types of quantitative technology based on infrared spectroscopy to detect profenofos were compared based on Fourier transform near-infrared (FT-NIR; 12,500–4000 cm(–1)) and Fourier transform mid-infrared (FT-MIR; 4000–400 cm(–1)) spectroscopies. Standard solutions in the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8515571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c03674 |
_version_ | 1784583637396619264 |
---|---|
author | Sankom, Atchara Mahakarnchanakul, Warapa Rittiron, Ronnarit Sajjaanantakul, Tanaboon Thongket, Thammasak |
author_facet | Sankom, Atchara Mahakarnchanakul, Warapa Rittiron, Ronnarit Sajjaanantakul, Tanaboon Thongket, Thammasak |
author_sort | Sankom, Atchara |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Different types of quantitative technology based on infrared spectroscopy to detect profenofos were compared based on Fourier transform near-infrared (FT-NIR; 12,500–4000 cm(–1)) and Fourier transform mid-infrared (FT-MIR; 4000–400 cm(–1)) spectroscopies. Standard solutions in the range of 0.1–100 mg/L combined with the dry-extract system for infrared (DESIR) technique were analyzed. Based on partial least-squares regression (PLSR) to develop a calibration equation, FT-NIR–PLSR produced the best prediction of profenofos residues based on the values for R(2) (0.87), standard error of prediction or SEP (11.68 mg/L), root-mean-square error of prediction or RMSEP (11.50 mg/L), bias (−0.81 mg/L), and ratio performance to deviation or RPD (2.81). In addition, FT-MIR–PLSR produced the best prediction of profenofos residues based on the values for R(2) (0.83), SEP (13.10 mg/L), RMSEP (13.00 mg/L), bias (1.46 mg/L), and RPD (2.49). Based on the ease of use and appropriate sample preparation, FT-NIR–PLSR combined with DESIR was chosen to detect profenofos in Chinese kale, cabbage, and chili spur pepper at concentrations of 0.53–106.28 mg/kg. The quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe technique coupled with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry was used to obtain the actual values. The best FT-NIR–PLSR equation provided good profenofos detection in all vegetables based on values for R(2) (0.88–0.97), SEP (5.27–11.07 mg/kg), RMSEP (5.25–11.00 mg/kg), bias (−1.39 to 1.30 mg/kg), and RPD (2.91–5.22). These statistics revealed no significant differences between the FT-NIR predicted values and actual values at a confidence interval of 95%, with agreeable results presented at pesticide residue levels over 30 mg/kg. FT-NIR spectroscopy combined with DESIR and PLSR should be considered as a promising screening method for pesticide detection in vegetables. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8515571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85155712021-10-15 Detection of Profenofos in Chinese Kale, Cabbage, and Chili Spur Pepper Using Fourier Transform Near-Infrared and Fourier Transform Mid-Infrared Spectroscopies Sankom, Atchara Mahakarnchanakul, Warapa Rittiron, Ronnarit Sajjaanantakul, Tanaboon Thongket, Thammasak ACS Omega [Image: see text] Different types of quantitative technology based on infrared spectroscopy to detect profenofos were compared based on Fourier transform near-infrared (FT-NIR; 12,500–4000 cm(–1)) and Fourier transform mid-infrared (FT-MIR; 4000–400 cm(–1)) spectroscopies. Standard solutions in the range of 0.1–100 mg/L combined with the dry-extract system for infrared (DESIR) technique were analyzed. Based on partial least-squares regression (PLSR) to develop a calibration equation, FT-NIR–PLSR produced the best prediction of profenofos residues based on the values for R(2) (0.87), standard error of prediction or SEP (11.68 mg/L), root-mean-square error of prediction or RMSEP (11.50 mg/L), bias (−0.81 mg/L), and ratio performance to deviation or RPD (2.81). In addition, FT-MIR–PLSR produced the best prediction of profenofos residues based on the values for R(2) (0.83), SEP (13.10 mg/L), RMSEP (13.00 mg/L), bias (1.46 mg/L), and RPD (2.49). Based on the ease of use and appropriate sample preparation, FT-NIR–PLSR combined with DESIR was chosen to detect profenofos in Chinese kale, cabbage, and chili spur pepper at concentrations of 0.53–106.28 mg/kg. The quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe technique coupled with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry was used to obtain the actual values. The best FT-NIR–PLSR equation provided good profenofos detection in all vegetables based on values for R(2) (0.88–0.97), SEP (5.27–11.07 mg/kg), RMSEP (5.25–11.00 mg/kg), bias (−1.39 to 1.30 mg/kg), and RPD (2.91–5.22). These statistics revealed no significant differences between the FT-NIR predicted values and actual values at a confidence interval of 95%, with agreeable results presented at pesticide residue levels over 30 mg/kg. FT-NIR spectroscopy combined with DESIR and PLSR should be considered as a promising screening method for pesticide detection in vegetables. American Chemical Society 2021-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8515571/ /pubmed/34660998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c03674 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Sankom, Atchara Mahakarnchanakul, Warapa Rittiron, Ronnarit Sajjaanantakul, Tanaboon Thongket, Thammasak Detection of Profenofos in Chinese Kale, Cabbage, and Chili Spur Pepper Using Fourier Transform Near-Infrared and Fourier Transform Mid-Infrared Spectroscopies |
title | Detection of Profenofos in Chinese Kale, Cabbage,
and Chili Spur Pepper Using Fourier Transform Near-Infrared and Fourier
Transform Mid-Infrared Spectroscopies |
title_full | Detection of Profenofos in Chinese Kale, Cabbage,
and Chili Spur Pepper Using Fourier Transform Near-Infrared and Fourier
Transform Mid-Infrared Spectroscopies |
title_fullStr | Detection of Profenofos in Chinese Kale, Cabbage,
and Chili Spur Pepper Using Fourier Transform Near-Infrared and Fourier
Transform Mid-Infrared Spectroscopies |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection of Profenofos in Chinese Kale, Cabbage,
and Chili Spur Pepper Using Fourier Transform Near-Infrared and Fourier
Transform Mid-Infrared Spectroscopies |
title_short | Detection of Profenofos in Chinese Kale, Cabbage,
and Chili Spur Pepper Using Fourier Transform Near-Infrared and Fourier
Transform Mid-Infrared Spectroscopies |
title_sort | detection of profenofos in chinese kale, cabbage,
and chili spur pepper using fourier transform near-infrared and fourier
transform mid-infrared spectroscopies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8515571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c03674 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sankomatchara detectionofprofenofosinchinesekalecabbageandchilispurpepperusingfouriertransformnearinfraredandfouriertransformmidinfraredspectroscopies AT mahakarnchanakulwarapa detectionofprofenofosinchinesekalecabbageandchilispurpepperusingfouriertransformnearinfraredandfouriertransformmidinfraredspectroscopies AT rittironronnarit detectionofprofenofosinchinesekalecabbageandchilispurpepperusingfouriertransformnearinfraredandfouriertransformmidinfraredspectroscopies AT sajjaanantakultanaboon detectionofprofenofosinchinesekalecabbageandchilispurpepperusingfouriertransformnearinfraredandfouriertransformmidinfraredspectroscopies AT thongketthammasak detectionofprofenofosinchinesekalecabbageandchilispurpepperusingfouriertransformnearinfraredandfouriertransformmidinfraredspectroscopies |