Cargando…

Choice Architecture Cueing to Healthier Dietary Choices and Physical Activity at the Workplace: Implementation and Feasibility Evaluation

Redesigning choice environments appears a promising approach to encourage healthier eating and physical activity, but little evidence exists of the feasibility of this approach in real-world settings. The aim of this paper is to portray the implementation and feasibility assessment of a 12-month mix...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rantala, Eeva, Vanhatalo, Saara, Tilles-Tirkkonen, Tanja, Kanerva, Markus, Hansen, Pelle Guldborg, Kolehmainen, Marjukka, Männikkö, Reija, Lindström, Jaana, Pihlajamäki, Jussi, Poutanen, Kaisa, Karhunen, Leila, Absetz, Pilvikki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34684592
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13103592
_version_ 1784588623545368576
author Rantala, Eeva
Vanhatalo, Saara
Tilles-Tirkkonen, Tanja
Kanerva, Markus
Hansen, Pelle Guldborg
Kolehmainen, Marjukka
Männikkö, Reija
Lindström, Jaana
Pihlajamäki, Jussi
Poutanen, Kaisa
Karhunen, Leila
Absetz, Pilvikki
author_facet Rantala, Eeva
Vanhatalo, Saara
Tilles-Tirkkonen, Tanja
Kanerva, Markus
Hansen, Pelle Guldborg
Kolehmainen, Marjukka
Männikkö, Reija
Lindström, Jaana
Pihlajamäki, Jussi
Poutanen, Kaisa
Karhunen, Leila
Absetz, Pilvikki
author_sort Rantala, Eeva
collection PubMed
description Redesigning choice environments appears a promising approach to encourage healthier eating and physical activity, but little evidence exists of the feasibility of this approach in real-world settings. The aim of this paper is to portray the implementation and feasibility assessment of a 12-month mixed-methods intervention study, StopDia at Work, targeting the environment of 53 diverse worksites. The intervention was conducted within a type 2 diabetes prevention study, StopDia. We assessed feasibility through the fidelity, facilitators and barriers, and maintenance of implementation, building on implementer interviews (n = 61 informants) and observations of the worksites at six (t1) and twelve months (t2). We analysed quantitative data with Kruskall–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests and qualitative data with content analysis. Intervention sites altogether implemented 23 various choice architectural strategies (median 3, range 0–14 strategies/site), employing 21 behaviour change mechanisms. Quantitative analysis found implementation was successful in 66%, imperfect in 25%, and failed in 9% of evaluated cases. These ratings were independent of the ease of implementation of applied strategies and reminders that implementers received. Researchers’ assistance in intervention launch (p = 0.02) and direct contact to intervention sites (p < 0.001) predicted higher fidelity at t1, but not at t2. Qualitative content analysis identified facilitators and barriers related to the organisation, intervention, worksite environment, implementer, and user. Contributors of successful implementation included apt implementers, sufficient implementer training, careful planning, integration into worksite values and activities, and management support. After the study, 49% of the worksites intended to maintain the implementation in some form. Overall, the choice architecture approach seems suitable for workplace health promotion, but a range of practicalities warrant consideration while designing real-world implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8538928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85389282021-10-24 Choice Architecture Cueing to Healthier Dietary Choices and Physical Activity at the Workplace: Implementation and Feasibility Evaluation Rantala, Eeva Vanhatalo, Saara Tilles-Tirkkonen, Tanja Kanerva, Markus Hansen, Pelle Guldborg Kolehmainen, Marjukka Männikkö, Reija Lindström, Jaana Pihlajamäki, Jussi Poutanen, Kaisa Karhunen, Leila Absetz, Pilvikki Nutrients Article Redesigning choice environments appears a promising approach to encourage healthier eating and physical activity, but little evidence exists of the feasibility of this approach in real-world settings. The aim of this paper is to portray the implementation and feasibility assessment of a 12-month mixed-methods intervention study, StopDia at Work, targeting the environment of 53 diverse worksites. The intervention was conducted within a type 2 diabetes prevention study, StopDia. We assessed feasibility through the fidelity, facilitators and barriers, and maintenance of implementation, building on implementer interviews (n = 61 informants) and observations of the worksites at six (t1) and twelve months (t2). We analysed quantitative data with Kruskall–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests and qualitative data with content analysis. Intervention sites altogether implemented 23 various choice architectural strategies (median 3, range 0–14 strategies/site), employing 21 behaviour change mechanisms. Quantitative analysis found implementation was successful in 66%, imperfect in 25%, and failed in 9% of evaluated cases. These ratings were independent of the ease of implementation of applied strategies and reminders that implementers received. Researchers’ assistance in intervention launch (p = 0.02) and direct contact to intervention sites (p < 0.001) predicted higher fidelity at t1, but not at t2. Qualitative content analysis identified facilitators and barriers related to the organisation, intervention, worksite environment, implementer, and user. Contributors of successful implementation included apt implementers, sufficient implementer training, careful planning, integration into worksite values and activities, and management support. After the study, 49% of the worksites intended to maintain the implementation in some form. Overall, the choice architecture approach seems suitable for workplace health promotion, but a range of practicalities warrant consideration while designing real-world implementation. MDPI 2021-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8538928/ /pubmed/34684592 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13103592 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rantala, Eeva
Vanhatalo, Saara
Tilles-Tirkkonen, Tanja
Kanerva, Markus
Hansen, Pelle Guldborg
Kolehmainen, Marjukka
Männikkö, Reija
Lindström, Jaana
Pihlajamäki, Jussi
Poutanen, Kaisa
Karhunen, Leila
Absetz, Pilvikki
Choice Architecture Cueing to Healthier Dietary Choices and Physical Activity at the Workplace: Implementation and Feasibility Evaluation
title Choice Architecture Cueing to Healthier Dietary Choices and Physical Activity at the Workplace: Implementation and Feasibility Evaluation
title_full Choice Architecture Cueing to Healthier Dietary Choices and Physical Activity at the Workplace: Implementation and Feasibility Evaluation
title_fullStr Choice Architecture Cueing to Healthier Dietary Choices and Physical Activity at the Workplace: Implementation and Feasibility Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Choice Architecture Cueing to Healthier Dietary Choices and Physical Activity at the Workplace: Implementation and Feasibility Evaluation
title_short Choice Architecture Cueing to Healthier Dietary Choices and Physical Activity at the Workplace: Implementation and Feasibility Evaluation
title_sort choice architecture cueing to healthier dietary choices and physical activity at the workplace: implementation and feasibility evaluation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34684592
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13103592
work_keys_str_mv AT rantalaeeva choicearchitecturecueingtohealthierdietarychoicesandphysicalactivityattheworkplaceimplementationandfeasibilityevaluation
AT vanhatalosaara choicearchitecturecueingtohealthierdietarychoicesandphysicalactivityattheworkplaceimplementationandfeasibilityevaluation
AT tillestirkkonentanja choicearchitecturecueingtohealthierdietarychoicesandphysicalactivityattheworkplaceimplementationandfeasibilityevaluation
AT kanervamarkus choicearchitecturecueingtohealthierdietarychoicesandphysicalactivityattheworkplaceimplementationandfeasibilityevaluation
AT hansenpelleguldborg choicearchitecturecueingtohealthierdietarychoicesandphysicalactivityattheworkplaceimplementationandfeasibilityevaluation
AT kolehmainenmarjukka choicearchitecturecueingtohealthierdietarychoicesandphysicalactivityattheworkplaceimplementationandfeasibilityevaluation
AT mannikkoreija choicearchitecturecueingtohealthierdietarychoicesandphysicalactivityattheworkplaceimplementationandfeasibilityevaluation
AT lindstromjaana choicearchitecturecueingtohealthierdietarychoicesandphysicalactivityattheworkplaceimplementationandfeasibilityevaluation
AT pihlajamakijussi choicearchitecturecueingtohealthierdietarychoicesandphysicalactivityattheworkplaceimplementationandfeasibilityevaluation
AT poutanenkaisa choicearchitecturecueingtohealthierdietarychoicesandphysicalactivityattheworkplaceimplementationandfeasibilityevaluation
AT karhunenleila choicearchitecturecueingtohealthierdietarychoicesandphysicalactivityattheworkplaceimplementationandfeasibilityevaluation
AT absetzpilvikki choicearchitecturecueingtohealthierdietarychoicesandphysicalactivityattheworkplaceimplementationandfeasibilityevaluation