Cargando…

Cross-sectional comparisons of sodium content in processed meat and fish products among five countries: potential for feasible targets and reformulation

INTRODUCTION: Reducing sodium intake has been identified as a highly cost-effective strategy to prevent and control high blood pressure and reduce cardiovascular mortality. This study aims to compare the sodium content in processed meat and fish products among five countries, which will contribute t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Yuzhu, Li, Yuan, Guo, Chunlei, Wang, Yishan, Huang, Liping, Tan, Monique, He, Feng J, Harris, Terry, MacGregor, Graham A, Ding, Jingmin, Dong, Le, Liu, Yu, Wang, Huijun, Zhang, Puhong, Ma, Yuxia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34649844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046412
_version_ 1784592692159709184
author Song, Yuzhu
Li, Yuan
Guo, Chunlei
Wang, Yishan
Huang, Liping
Tan, Monique
He, Feng J
Harris, Terry
MacGregor, Graham A
Ding, Jingmin
Dong, Le
Liu, Yu
Wang, Huijun
Zhang, Puhong
Ma, Yuxia
author_facet Song, Yuzhu
Li, Yuan
Guo, Chunlei
Wang, Yishan
Huang, Liping
Tan, Monique
He, Feng J
Harris, Terry
MacGregor, Graham A
Ding, Jingmin
Dong, Le
Liu, Yu
Wang, Huijun
Zhang, Puhong
Ma, Yuxia
author_sort Song, Yuzhu
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Reducing sodium intake has been identified as a highly cost-effective strategy to prevent and control high blood pressure and reduce cardiovascular mortality. This study aims to compare the sodium content in processed meat and fish products among five countries, which will contribute to the evidence-base for feasible strategies of sodium reduction in such products. METHODS: Sodium content on product labels of 26 500 prepackaged products, 19 601 meat and 6899 fish, was collected in supermarkets from five countries using the FoodSwitch mobile application from 2012 to 2018. To be specific, it was 1898 products in China, 885 in the UK, 5673 in Australia, 946 in South Africa and 17 098 in the USA. Cross-sectional comparisons of sodium levels and proportions meeting 2017 UK sodium reduction targets were conducted using Kruskal-Wallis H and the χ(2) test, respectively across the five countries. RESULTS: The results showed that processed meat and fish products combined in China had the highest sodium level (median 1050 mg/100 g, IQR: 774–1473), followed by the USA, South Africa, Australia, with the lowest levels found in UK (432 mg/100 g, IQR: 236–786) (p<0.001). Similar variations, that is, a twofold to threefold difference of sodium content between the highest and the lowest countries were found among processed meat and fish products separately. Large sodium content variations were also found in certain specific food subcategories across the five countries, as well as across different food subcategories within each country. CONCLUSION: Processed meat and fish products differ greatly in sodium content across different countries and across different food subcategories. This indicates great potential for food producers to reformulate the products in sodium content, as well as for consumers to select less salted food.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8559105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85591052021-11-04 Cross-sectional comparisons of sodium content in processed meat and fish products among five countries: potential for feasible targets and reformulation Song, Yuzhu Li, Yuan Guo, Chunlei Wang, Yishan Huang, Liping Tan, Monique He, Feng J Harris, Terry MacGregor, Graham A Ding, Jingmin Dong, Le Liu, Yu Wang, Huijun Zhang, Puhong Ma, Yuxia BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: Reducing sodium intake has been identified as a highly cost-effective strategy to prevent and control high blood pressure and reduce cardiovascular mortality. This study aims to compare the sodium content in processed meat and fish products among five countries, which will contribute to the evidence-base for feasible strategies of sodium reduction in such products. METHODS: Sodium content on product labels of 26 500 prepackaged products, 19 601 meat and 6899 fish, was collected in supermarkets from five countries using the FoodSwitch mobile application from 2012 to 2018. To be specific, it was 1898 products in China, 885 in the UK, 5673 in Australia, 946 in South Africa and 17 098 in the USA. Cross-sectional comparisons of sodium levels and proportions meeting 2017 UK sodium reduction targets were conducted using Kruskal-Wallis H and the χ(2) test, respectively across the five countries. RESULTS: The results showed that processed meat and fish products combined in China had the highest sodium level (median 1050 mg/100 g, IQR: 774–1473), followed by the USA, South Africa, Australia, with the lowest levels found in UK (432 mg/100 g, IQR: 236–786) (p<0.001). Similar variations, that is, a twofold to threefold difference of sodium content between the highest and the lowest countries were found among processed meat and fish products separately. Large sodium content variations were also found in certain specific food subcategories across the five countries, as well as across different food subcategories within each country. CONCLUSION: Processed meat and fish products differ greatly in sodium content across different countries and across different food subcategories. This indicates great potential for food producers to reformulate the products in sodium content, as well as for consumers to select less salted food. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8559105/ /pubmed/34649844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046412 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Song, Yuzhu
Li, Yuan
Guo, Chunlei
Wang, Yishan
Huang, Liping
Tan, Monique
He, Feng J
Harris, Terry
MacGregor, Graham A
Ding, Jingmin
Dong, Le
Liu, Yu
Wang, Huijun
Zhang, Puhong
Ma, Yuxia
Cross-sectional comparisons of sodium content in processed meat and fish products among five countries: potential for feasible targets and reformulation
title Cross-sectional comparisons of sodium content in processed meat and fish products among five countries: potential for feasible targets and reformulation
title_full Cross-sectional comparisons of sodium content in processed meat and fish products among five countries: potential for feasible targets and reformulation
title_fullStr Cross-sectional comparisons of sodium content in processed meat and fish products among five countries: potential for feasible targets and reformulation
title_full_unstemmed Cross-sectional comparisons of sodium content in processed meat and fish products among five countries: potential for feasible targets and reformulation
title_short Cross-sectional comparisons of sodium content in processed meat and fish products among five countries: potential for feasible targets and reformulation
title_sort cross-sectional comparisons of sodium content in processed meat and fish products among five countries: potential for feasible targets and reformulation
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34649844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046412
work_keys_str_mv AT songyuzhu crosssectionalcomparisonsofsodiumcontentinprocessedmeatandfishproductsamongfivecountriespotentialforfeasibletargetsandreformulation
AT liyuan crosssectionalcomparisonsofsodiumcontentinprocessedmeatandfishproductsamongfivecountriespotentialforfeasibletargetsandreformulation
AT guochunlei crosssectionalcomparisonsofsodiumcontentinprocessedmeatandfishproductsamongfivecountriespotentialforfeasibletargetsandreformulation
AT wangyishan crosssectionalcomparisonsofsodiumcontentinprocessedmeatandfishproductsamongfivecountriespotentialforfeasibletargetsandreformulation
AT huangliping crosssectionalcomparisonsofsodiumcontentinprocessedmeatandfishproductsamongfivecountriespotentialforfeasibletargetsandreformulation
AT tanmonique crosssectionalcomparisonsofsodiumcontentinprocessedmeatandfishproductsamongfivecountriespotentialforfeasibletargetsandreformulation
AT hefengj crosssectionalcomparisonsofsodiumcontentinprocessedmeatandfishproductsamongfivecountriespotentialforfeasibletargetsandreformulation
AT harristerry crosssectionalcomparisonsofsodiumcontentinprocessedmeatandfishproductsamongfivecountriespotentialforfeasibletargetsandreformulation
AT macgregorgrahama crosssectionalcomparisonsofsodiumcontentinprocessedmeatandfishproductsamongfivecountriespotentialforfeasibletargetsandreformulation
AT dingjingmin crosssectionalcomparisonsofsodiumcontentinprocessedmeatandfishproductsamongfivecountriespotentialforfeasibletargetsandreformulation
AT dongle crosssectionalcomparisonsofsodiumcontentinprocessedmeatandfishproductsamongfivecountriespotentialforfeasibletargetsandreformulation
AT liuyu crosssectionalcomparisonsofsodiumcontentinprocessedmeatandfishproductsamongfivecountriespotentialforfeasibletargetsandreformulation
AT wanghuijun crosssectionalcomparisonsofsodiumcontentinprocessedmeatandfishproductsamongfivecountriespotentialforfeasibletargetsandreformulation
AT zhangpuhong crosssectionalcomparisonsofsodiumcontentinprocessedmeatandfishproductsamongfivecountriespotentialforfeasibletargetsandreformulation
AT mayuxia crosssectionalcomparisonsofsodiumcontentinprocessedmeatandfishproductsamongfivecountriespotentialforfeasibletargetsandreformulation