Cargando…
How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type?
Our understanding of cell types has advanced considerably with the publication of single-cell atlases. Marker genes play an essential role for experimental validation and computational analyses such as physiological characterization, annotation, and deconvolution. However, a framework for quantifyin...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8571500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.103292 |
_version_ | 1784595034318831616 |
---|---|
author | Fischer, Stephan Gillis, Jesse |
author_facet | Fischer, Stephan Gillis, Jesse |
author_sort | Fischer, Stephan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Our understanding of cell types has advanced considerably with the publication of single-cell atlases. Marker genes play an essential role for experimental validation and computational analyses such as physiological characterization, annotation, and deconvolution. However, a framework for quantifying marker replicability and selecting replicable markers is currently lacking. Here, using high-quality data from the Brain Initiative Cell Census Network (BICCN), we systematically investigate marker replicability for 85 neuronal cell types. We show that, due to dataset-specific noise, we need to combine 5 datasets to obtain robust differentially expressed (DE) genes, particularly for rare populations and lowly expressed genes. We estimate that 10 to 200 meta-analytic markers provide optimal downstream performance and make available replicable marker lists for the 85 BICCN cell types. Replicable marker lists condense interpretable and generalizable information about cell types, opening avenues for downstream applications, including cell type annotation, selection of gene panels, and bulk data deconvolution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8571500 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85715002021-11-10 How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type? Fischer, Stephan Gillis, Jesse iScience Article Our understanding of cell types has advanced considerably with the publication of single-cell atlases. Marker genes play an essential role for experimental validation and computational analyses such as physiological characterization, annotation, and deconvolution. However, a framework for quantifying marker replicability and selecting replicable markers is currently lacking. Here, using high-quality data from the Brain Initiative Cell Census Network (BICCN), we systematically investigate marker replicability for 85 neuronal cell types. We show that, due to dataset-specific noise, we need to combine 5 datasets to obtain robust differentially expressed (DE) genes, particularly for rare populations and lowly expressed genes. We estimate that 10 to 200 meta-analytic markers provide optimal downstream performance and make available replicable marker lists for the 85 BICCN cell types. Replicable marker lists condense interpretable and generalizable information about cell types, opening avenues for downstream applications, including cell type annotation, selection of gene panels, and bulk data deconvolution. Elsevier 2021-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8571500/ /pubmed/34765918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.103292 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Fischer, Stephan Gillis, Jesse How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type? |
title | How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type? |
title_full | How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type? |
title_fullStr | How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type? |
title_full_unstemmed | How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type? |
title_short | How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type? |
title_sort | how many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8571500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.103292 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fischerstephan howmanymarkersareneededtorobustlydetermineacellstype AT gillisjesse howmanymarkersareneededtorobustlydetermineacellstype |