Cargando…

How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type?

Our understanding of cell types has advanced considerably with the publication of single-cell atlases. Marker genes play an essential role for experimental validation and computational analyses such as physiological characterization, annotation, and deconvolution. However, a framework for quantifyin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fischer, Stephan, Gillis, Jesse
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8571500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.103292
_version_ 1784595034318831616
author Fischer, Stephan
Gillis, Jesse
author_facet Fischer, Stephan
Gillis, Jesse
author_sort Fischer, Stephan
collection PubMed
description Our understanding of cell types has advanced considerably with the publication of single-cell atlases. Marker genes play an essential role for experimental validation and computational analyses such as physiological characterization, annotation, and deconvolution. However, a framework for quantifying marker replicability and selecting replicable markers is currently lacking. Here, using high-quality data from the Brain Initiative Cell Census Network (BICCN), we systematically investigate marker replicability for 85 neuronal cell types. We show that, due to dataset-specific noise, we need to combine 5 datasets to obtain robust differentially expressed (DE) genes, particularly for rare populations and lowly expressed genes. We estimate that 10 to 200 meta-analytic markers provide optimal downstream performance and make available replicable marker lists for the 85 BICCN cell types. Replicable marker lists condense interpretable and generalizable information about cell types, opening avenues for downstream applications, including cell type annotation, selection of gene panels, and bulk data deconvolution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8571500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85715002021-11-10 How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type? Fischer, Stephan Gillis, Jesse iScience Article Our understanding of cell types has advanced considerably with the publication of single-cell atlases. Marker genes play an essential role for experimental validation and computational analyses such as physiological characterization, annotation, and deconvolution. However, a framework for quantifying marker replicability and selecting replicable markers is currently lacking. Here, using high-quality data from the Brain Initiative Cell Census Network (BICCN), we systematically investigate marker replicability for 85 neuronal cell types. We show that, due to dataset-specific noise, we need to combine 5 datasets to obtain robust differentially expressed (DE) genes, particularly for rare populations and lowly expressed genes. We estimate that 10 to 200 meta-analytic markers provide optimal downstream performance and make available replicable marker lists for the 85 BICCN cell types. Replicable marker lists condense interpretable and generalizable information about cell types, opening avenues for downstream applications, including cell type annotation, selection of gene panels, and bulk data deconvolution. Elsevier 2021-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8571500/ /pubmed/34765918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.103292 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fischer, Stephan
Gillis, Jesse
How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type?
title How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type?
title_full How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type?
title_fullStr How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type?
title_full_unstemmed How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type?
title_short How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type?
title_sort how many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8571500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.103292
work_keys_str_mv AT fischerstephan howmanymarkersareneededtorobustlydetermineacellstype
AT gillisjesse howmanymarkersareneededtorobustlydetermineacellstype