Cargando…

Health Humanities curriculum and evaluation in health professions education: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: The articulation of learning goals, processes and outcomes related to health humanities teaching currently lacks comparability of curricula and outcomes, and requires synthesis to provide a basis for developing a curriculum and evaluation framework for health humanities teaching and lear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carr, Sandra E., Noya, Farah, Phillips, Brid, Harris, Anna, Scott, Karen, Hooker, Claire, Mavaddat, Nahal, Ani-Amponsah, Mary, Vuillermin, Daniel M., Reid, Steve, Brett-MacLean, Pamela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8579562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34753482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03002-1
_version_ 1784596451436789760
author Carr, Sandra E.
Noya, Farah
Phillips, Brid
Harris, Anna
Scott, Karen
Hooker, Claire
Mavaddat, Nahal
Ani-Amponsah, Mary
Vuillermin, Daniel M.
Reid, Steve
Brett-MacLean, Pamela
author_facet Carr, Sandra E.
Noya, Farah
Phillips, Brid
Harris, Anna
Scott, Karen
Hooker, Claire
Mavaddat, Nahal
Ani-Amponsah, Mary
Vuillermin, Daniel M.
Reid, Steve
Brett-MacLean, Pamela
author_sort Carr, Sandra E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The articulation of learning goals, processes and outcomes related to health humanities teaching currently lacks comparability of curricula and outcomes, and requires synthesis to provide a basis for developing a curriculum and evaluation framework for health humanities teaching and learning. This scoping review sought to answer how and why the health humanities are used in health professions education. It also sought to explore how health humanities curricula are evaluated and whether the programme evaluation aligns with the desired learning outcomes. METHODS: A focused scoping review of qualitative and mixed-methods studies that included the influence of integrated health humanities curricula in pre-registration health professions education with programme evaluate of outcomes was completed. Studies of students not enrolled in a pre-registration course, with only ad-hoc health humanities learning experiences that were not assessed or evaluated were excluded. Four databases were searched (CINAHL), (ERIC), PubMed, and Medline. RESULTS: The search over a 5 year period, identified 8621 publications. Title and abstract screening, followed by full-text screening, resulted in 24 articles selected for inclusion. Learning outcomes, learning activities and evaluation data were extracted from each included publication. DISCUSSION: Reported health humanities curricula focused on developing students’ capacity for perspective, reflexivity, self- reflection and person-centred approaches to communication. However, the learning outcomes were not consistently described, identifying a limited capacity to compare health humanities curricula across programmes. A set of clearly stated generic capabilities or outcomes from learning in health humanities would be a helpful next step for benchmarking, clarification and comparison of evaluation strategy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-03002-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8579562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85795622021-11-10 Health Humanities curriculum and evaluation in health professions education: a scoping review Carr, Sandra E. Noya, Farah Phillips, Brid Harris, Anna Scott, Karen Hooker, Claire Mavaddat, Nahal Ani-Amponsah, Mary Vuillermin, Daniel M. Reid, Steve Brett-MacLean, Pamela BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: The articulation of learning goals, processes and outcomes related to health humanities teaching currently lacks comparability of curricula and outcomes, and requires synthesis to provide a basis for developing a curriculum and evaluation framework for health humanities teaching and learning. This scoping review sought to answer how and why the health humanities are used in health professions education. It also sought to explore how health humanities curricula are evaluated and whether the programme evaluation aligns with the desired learning outcomes. METHODS: A focused scoping review of qualitative and mixed-methods studies that included the influence of integrated health humanities curricula in pre-registration health professions education with programme evaluate of outcomes was completed. Studies of students not enrolled in a pre-registration course, with only ad-hoc health humanities learning experiences that were not assessed or evaluated were excluded. Four databases were searched (CINAHL), (ERIC), PubMed, and Medline. RESULTS: The search over a 5 year period, identified 8621 publications. Title and abstract screening, followed by full-text screening, resulted in 24 articles selected for inclusion. Learning outcomes, learning activities and evaluation data were extracted from each included publication. DISCUSSION: Reported health humanities curricula focused on developing students’ capacity for perspective, reflexivity, self- reflection and person-centred approaches to communication. However, the learning outcomes were not consistently described, identifying a limited capacity to compare health humanities curricula across programmes. A set of clearly stated generic capabilities or outcomes from learning in health humanities would be a helpful next step for benchmarking, clarification and comparison of evaluation strategy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-03002-1. BioMed Central 2021-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8579562/ /pubmed/34753482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03002-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Carr, Sandra E.
Noya, Farah
Phillips, Brid
Harris, Anna
Scott, Karen
Hooker, Claire
Mavaddat, Nahal
Ani-Amponsah, Mary
Vuillermin, Daniel M.
Reid, Steve
Brett-MacLean, Pamela
Health Humanities curriculum and evaluation in health professions education: a scoping review
title Health Humanities curriculum and evaluation in health professions education: a scoping review
title_full Health Humanities curriculum and evaluation in health professions education: a scoping review
title_fullStr Health Humanities curriculum and evaluation in health professions education: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Health Humanities curriculum and evaluation in health professions education: a scoping review
title_short Health Humanities curriculum and evaluation in health professions education: a scoping review
title_sort health humanities curriculum and evaluation in health professions education: a scoping review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8579562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34753482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03002-1
work_keys_str_mv AT carrsandrae healthhumanitiescurriculumandevaluationinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview
AT noyafarah healthhumanitiescurriculumandevaluationinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview
AT phillipsbrid healthhumanitiescurriculumandevaluationinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview
AT harrisanna healthhumanitiescurriculumandevaluationinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview
AT scottkaren healthhumanitiescurriculumandevaluationinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview
AT hookerclaire healthhumanitiescurriculumandevaluationinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview
AT mavaddatnahal healthhumanitiescurriculumandevaluationinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview
AT aniamponsahmary healthhumanitiescurriculumandevaluationinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview
AT vuillermindanielm healthhumanitiescurriculumandevaluationinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview
AT reidsteve healthhumanitiescurriculumandevaluationinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview
AT brettmacleanpamela healthhumanitiescurriculumandevaluationinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview