Cargando…
Health Humanities curriculum and evaluation in health professions education: a scoping review
BACKGROUND: The articulation of learning goals, processes and outcomes related to health humanities teaching currently lacks comparability of curricula and outcomes, and requires synthesis to provide a basis for developing a curriculum and evaluation framework for health humanities teaching and lear...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8579562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34753482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03002-1 |
_version_ | 1784596451436789760 |
---|---|
author | Carr, Sandra E. Noya, Farah Phillips, Brid Harris, Anna Scott, Karen Hooker, Claire Mavaddat, Nahal Ani-Amponsah, Mary Vuillermin, Daniel M. Reid, Steve Brett-MacLean, Pamela |
author_facet | Carr, Sandra E. Noya, Farah Phillips, Brid Harris, Anna Scott, Karen Hooker, Claire Mavaddat, Nahal Ani-Amponsah, Mary Vuillermin, Daniel M. Reid, Steve Brett-MacLean, Pamela |
author_sort | Carr, Sandra E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The articulation of learning goals, processes and outcomes related to health humanities teaching currently lacks comparability of curricula and outcomes, and requires synthesis to provide a basis for developing a curriculum and evaluation framework for health humanities teaching and learning. This scoping review sought to answer how and why the health humanities are used in health professions education. It also sought to explore how health humanities curricula are evaluated and whether the programme evaluation aligns with the desired learning outcomes. METHODS: A focused scoping review of qualitative and mixed-methods studies that included the influence of integrated health humanities curricula in pre-registration health professions education with programme evaluate of outcomes was completed. Studies of students not enrolled in a pre-registration course, with only ad-hoc health humanities learning experiences that were not assessed or evaluated were excluded. Four databases were searched (CINAHL), (ERIC), PubMed, and Medline. RESULTS: The search over a 5 year period, identified 8621 publications. Title and abstract screening, followed by full-text screening, resulted in 24 articles selected for inclusion. Learning outcomes, learning activities and evaluation data were extracted from each included publication. DISCUSSION: Reported health humanities curricula focused on developing students’ capacity for perspective, reflexivity, self- reflection and person-centred approaches to communication. However, the learning outcomes were not consistently described, identifying a limited capacity to compare health humanities curricula across programmes. A set of clearly stated generic capabilities or outcomes from learning in health humanities would be a helpful next step for benchmarking, clarification and comparison of evaluation strategy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-03002-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8579562 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85795622021-11-10 Health Humanities curriculum and evaluation in health professions education: a scoping review Carr, Sandra E. Noya, Farah Phillips, Brid Harris, Anna Scott, Karen Hooker, Claire Mavaddat, Nahal Ani-Amponsah, Mary Vuillermin, Daniel M. Reid, Steve Brett-MacLean, Pamela BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: The articulation of learning goals, processes and outcomes related to health humanities teaching currently lacks comparability of curricula and outcomes, and requires synthesis to provide a basis for developing a curriculum and evaluation framework for health humanities teaching and learning. This scoping review sought to answer how and why the health humanities are used in health professions education. It also sought to explore how health humanities curricula are evaluated and whether the programme evaluation aligns with the desired learning outcomes. METHODS: A focused scoping review of qualitative and mixed-methods studies that included the influence of integrated health humanities curricula in pre-registration health professions education with programme evaluate of outcomes was completed. Studies of students not enrolled in a pre-registration course, with only ad-hoc health humanities learning experiences that were not assessed or evaluated were excluded. Four databases were searched (CINAHL), (ERIC), PubMed, and Medline. RESULTS: The search over a 5 year period, identified 8621 publications. Title and abstract screening, followed by full-text screening, resulted in 24 articles selected for inclusion. Learning outcomes, learning activities and evaluation data were extracted from each included publication. DISCUSSION: Reported health humanities curricula focused on developing students’ capacity for perspective, reflexivity, self- reflection and person-centred approaches to communication. However, the learning outcomes were not consistently described, identifying a limited capacity to compare health humanities curricula across programmes. A set of clearly stated generic capabilities or outcomes from learning in health humanities would be a helpful next step for benchmarking, clarification and comparison of evaluation strategy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-03002-1. BioMed Central 2021-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8579562/ /pubmed/34753482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03002-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Carr, Sandra E. Noya, Farah Phillips, Brid Harris, Anna Scott, Karen Hooker, Claire Mavaddat, Nahal Ani-Amponsah, Mary Vuillermin, Daniel M. Reid, Steve Brett-MacLean, Pamela Health Humanities curriculum and evaluation in health professions education: a scoping review |
title | Health Humanities curriculum and evaluation in health professions education: a scoping review |
title_full | Health Humanities curriculum and evaluation in health professions education: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Health Humanities curriculum and evaluation in health professions education: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Health Humanities curriculum and evaluation in health professions education: a scoping review |
title_short | Health Humanities curriculum and evaluation in health professions education: a scoping review |
title_sort | health humanities curriculum and evaluation in health professions education: a scoping review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8579562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34753482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03002-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carrsandrae healthhumanitiescurriculumandevaluationinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview AT noyafarah healthhumanitiescurriculumandevaluationinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview AT phillipsbrid healthhumanitiescurriculumandevaluationinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview AT harrisanna healthhumanitiescurriculumandevaluationinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview AT scottkaren healthhumanitiescurriculumandevaluationinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview AT hookerclaire healthhumanitiescurriculumandevaluationinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview AT mavaddatnahal healthhumanitiescurriculumandevaluationinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview AT aniamponsahmary healthhumanitiescurriculumandevaluationinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview AT vuillermindanielm healthhumanitiescurriculumandevaluationinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview AT reidsteve healthhumanitiescurriculumandevaluationinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview AT brettmacleanpamela healthhumanitiescurriculumandevaluationinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview |