Cargando…

Skeletal Muscle Adaptations and Performance Outcomes Following a Step and Exponential Taper in Strength Athletes

Before major athletic events, a taper is often prescribed to facilitate recovery and enhance performance. However, it is unknown which taper model is most effective for peaking maximal strength and positively augmenting skeletal muscle. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare performance outc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Travis, S. Kyle, Zwetsloot, Kevin A., Mujika, Iñigo, Stone, Michael H., Bazyler, Caleb D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34777004
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.735932
_version_ 1784596965422530560
author Travis, S. Kyle
Zwetsloot, Kevin A.
Mujika, Iñigo
Stone, Michael H.
Bazyler, Caleb D.
author_facet Travis, S. Kyle
Zwetsloot, Kevin A.
Mujika, Iñigo
Stone, Michael H.
Bazyler, Caleb D.
author_sort Travis, S. Kyle
collection PubMed
description Before major athletic events, a taper is often prescribed to facilitate recovery and enhance performance. However, it is unknown which taper model is most effective for peaking maximal strength and positively augmenting skeletal muscle. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare performance outcomes and skeletal muscle adaptations following a step vs. an exponential taper in strength athletes. Sixteen powerlifters (24.0 ± 4.0 years, 174.4 ± 8.2 cm, 89.8 ± 21.4 kg) participated in a 6-week training program aimed at peaking maximal strength on back squat [initial 1-repetition-maximum (1RM): 174.7 ± 33.4 kg], bench press (118.5 ± 29.9 kg), and deadlift (189.9 ± 41.2 kg). Powerlifters were matched based on relative maximal strength, and randomly assigned to either (a) 1-week overreach and 1-week step taper or (b) 1-week overreach and 3-week exponential taper. Athletes were tested pre- and post-training on measures of body composition, jumping performance, isometric squat, and 1RM. Whole muscle size was assessed at the proximal, middle, and distal vastus lateralis using ultrasonography and microbiopsies at the middle vastus lateralis site. Muscle samples (n = 15) were analyzed for fiber size, fiber type [myosin-heavy chain (MHC)-I, -IIA, -IIX, hybrid-I/IIA] using whole muscle immunohistochemistry and single fiber dot blots, gene expression, and microRNA abundance. There were significant main time effects for 1RM squat (p < 0.001), bench press (p < 0.001), and deadlift, (p = 0.024), powerlifting total (p < 0.001), Wilks Score (p < 0.001), squat jump peak-power scaled to body mass (p = 0.001), body mass (p = 0.005), fat mass (p = 0.002), and fat mass index (p = 0.002). There were significant main time effects for medial whole muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA) (p = 0.006) and averaged sites (p < 0.001). There was also a significant interaction for MHC-IIA fiber cross-sectional area (fCSA) (p = 0.014) with post hoc comparisons revealing increases following the step-taper only (p = 0.002). There were significant main time effects for single-fiber MHC-I% (p = 0.015) and MHC-IIA% (p = 0.033), as well as for MyoD (p = 0.002), MyoG (p = 0.037), and miR-499a (p = 0.033). Overall, increases in whole mCSA, fCSA, MHC-IIA fCSA, and MHC transitions appeared to favor the step taper group. An overreach followed by a step taper appears to produce a myocellular environment that enhances skeletal muscle adaptations, whereas an exponential taper may favor neuromuscular performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8582352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85823522021-11-12 Skeletal Muscle Adaptations and Performance Outcomes Following a Step and Exponential Taper in Strength Athletes Travis, S. Kyle Zwetsloot, Kevin A. Mujika, Iñigo Stone, Michael H. Bazyler, Caleb D. Front Physiol Physiology Before major athletic events, a taper is often prescribed to facilitate recovery and enhance performance. However, it is unknown which taper model is most effective for peaking maximal strength and positively augmenting skeletal muscle. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare performance outcomes and skeletal muscle adaptations following a step vs. an exponential taper in strength athletes. Sixteen powerlifters (24.0 ± 4.0 years, 174.4 ± 8.2 cm, 89.8 ± 21.4 kg) participated in a 6-week training program aimed at peaking maximal strength on back squat [initial 1-repetition-maximum (1RM): 174.7 ± 33.4 kg], bench press (118.5 ± 29.9 kg), and deadlift (189.9 ± 41.2 kg). Powerlifters were matched based on relative maximal strength, and randomly assigned to either (a) 1-week overreach and 1-week step taper or (b) 1-week overreach and 3-week exponential taper. Athletes were tested pre- and post-training on measures of body composition, jumping performance, isometric squat, and 1RM. Whole muscle size was assessed at the proximal, middle, and distal vastus lateralis using ultrasonography and microbiopsies at the middle vastus lateralis site. Muscle samples (n = 15) were analyzed for fiber size, fiber type [myosin-heavy chain (MHC)-I, -IIA, -IIX, hybrid-I/IIA] using whole muscle immunohistochemistry and single fiber dot blots, gene expression, and microRNA abundance. There were significant main time effects for 1RM squat (p < 0.001), bench press (p < 0.001), and deadlift, (p = 0.024), powerlifting total (p < 0.001), Wilks Score (p < 0.001), squat jump peak-power scaled to body mass (p = 0.001), body mass (p = 0.005), fat mass (p = 0.002), and fat mass index (p = 0.002). There were significant main time effects for medial whole muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA) (p = 0.006) and averaged sites (p < 0.001). There was also a significant interaction for MHC-IIA fiber cross-sectional area (fCSA) (p = 0.014) with post hoc comparisons revealing increases following the step-taper only (p = 0.002). There were significant main time effects for single-fiber MHC-I% (p = 0.015) and MHC-IIA% (p = 0.033), as well as for MyoD (p = 0.002), MyoG (p = 0.037), and miR-499a (p = 0.033). Overall, increases in whole mCSA, fCSA, MHC-IIA fCSA, and MHC transitions appeared to favor the step taper group. An overreach followed by a step taper appears to produce a myocellular environment that enhances skeletal muscle adaptations, whereas an exponential taper may favor neuromuscular performance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8582352/ /pubmed/34777004 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.735932 Text en Copyright © 2021 Travis, Zwetsloot, Mujika, Stone and Bazyler. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Travis, S. Kyle
Zwetsloot, Kevin A.
Mujika, Iñigo
Stone, Michael H.
Bazyler, Caleb D.
Skeletal Muscle Adaptations and Performance Outcomes Following a Step and Exponential Taper in Strength Athletes
title Skeletal Muscle Adaptations and Performance Outcomes Following a Step and Exponential Taper in Strength Athletes
title_full Skeletal Muscle Adaptations and Performance Outcomes Following a Step and Exponential Taper in Strength Athletes
title_fullStr Skeletal Muscle Adaptations and Performance Outcomes Following a Step and Exponential Taper in Strength Athletes
title_full_unstemmed Skeletal Muscle Adaptations and Performance Outcomes Following a Step and Exponential Taper in Strength Athletes
title_short Skeletal Muscle Adaptations and Performance Outcomes Following a Step and Exponential Taper in Strength Athletes
title_sort skeletal muscle adaptations and performance outcomes following a step and exponential taper in strength athletes
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34777004
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.735932
work_keys_str_mv AT travisskyle skeletalmuscleadaptationsandperformanceoutcomesfollowingastepandexponentialtaperinstrengthathletes
AT zwetslootkevina skeletalmuscleadaptationsandperformanceoutcomesfollowingastepandexponentialtaperinstrengthathletes
AT mujikainigo skeletalmuscleadaptationsandperformanceoutcomesfollowingastepandexponentialtaperinstrengthathletes
AT stonemichaelh skeletalmuscleadaptationsandperformanceoutcomesfollowingastepandexponentialtaperinstrengthathletes
AT bazylercalebd skeletalmuscleadaptationsandperformanceoutcomesfollowingastepandexponentialtaperinstrengthathletes