Cargando…

Burger Model as the Best Option for Modeling of Viscoelastic Behavior of Resists for Nanoimprint Lithography

In this study, Atomic Force Microscopy-based nanoindentation (AFM-NI) with diamond-like carbon (DLC) coated tip was used to analyze the mechanical response of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) thin films (thicknesses: 235 and 513 nm) on a silicon substrate. Then, Oliver and Pharr (OP) model was used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grzywacz, Hubert, Jenczyk, Piotr, Milczarek, Michał, Michałowski, Marcin, Jarząbek, Dariusz M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34772164
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216639
_version_ 1784598305845542912
author Grzywacz, Hubert
Jenczyk, Piotr
Milczarek, Michał
Michałowski, Marcin
Jarząbek, Dariusz M.
author_facet Grzywacz, Hubert
Jenczyk, Piotr
Milczarek, Michał
Michałowski, Marcin
Jarząbek, Dariusz M.
author_sort Grzywacz, Hubert
collection PubMed
description In this study, Atomic Force Microscopy-based nanoindentation (AFM-NI) with diamond-like carbon (DLC) coated tip was used to analyze the mechanical response of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) thin films (thicknesses: 235 and 513 nm) on a silicon substrate. Then, Oliver and Pharr (OP) model was used to calculate hardness and Young’s modulus, while three different Static Linear Solid models were used to fit the creep curve and measure creep compliance, Young’s modulus, and viscosity. Values were compared with each other, and the best-suited method was suggested. The impact of four temperatures below the glass transition temperature and varied indentation depth on the mechanical properties has been analyzed. The results show high sensitivity on experiment parameters and there is a clear difference between thin and thick film. According to the requirements in the nanoimprint lithography (NIL), the ratio of hardness at demolding temperature to viscosity at molding temperature was introduced as a simple parameter for prediction of resist suitability for NIL. Finally, thinner PMMA film was tentatively attributed as more suitable for NIL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8587944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85879442021-11-13 Burger Model as the Best Option for Modeling of Viscoelastic Behavior of Resists for Nanoimprint Lithography Grzywacz, Hubert Jenczyk, Piotr Milczarek, Michał Michałowski, Marcin Jarząbek, Dariusz M. Materials (Basel) Article In this study, Atomic Force Microscopy-based nanoindentation (AFM-NI) with diamond-like carbon (DLC) coated tip was used to analyze the mechanical response of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) thin films (thicknesses: 235 and 513 nm) on a silicon substrate. Then, Oliver and Pharr (OP) model was used to calculate hardness and Young’s modulus, while three different Static Linear Solid models were used to fit the creep curve and measure creep compliance, Young’s modulus, and viscosity. Values were compared with each other, and the best-suited method was suggested. The impact of four temperatures below the glass transition temperature and varied indentation depth on the mechanical properties has been analyzed. The results show high sensitivity on experiment parameters and there is a clear difference between thin and thick film. According to the requirements in the nanoimprint lithography (NIL), the ratio of hardness at demolding temperature to viscosity at molding temperature was introduced as a simple parameter for prediction of resist suitability for NIL. Finally, thinner PMMA film was tentatively attributed as more suitable for NIL. MDPI 2021-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8587944/ /pubmed/34772164 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216639 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Grzywacz, Hubert
Jenczyk, Piotr
Milczarek, Michał
Michałowski, Marcin
Jarząbek, Dariusz M.
Burger Model as the Best Option for Modeling of Viscoelastic Behavior of Resists for Nanoimprint Lithography
title Burger Model as the Best Option for Modeling of Viscoelastic Behavior of Resists for Nanoimprint Lithography
title_full Burger Model as the Best Option for Modeling of Viscoelastic Behavior of Resists for Nanoimprint Lithography
title_fullStr Burger Model as the Best Option for Modeling of Viscoelastic Behavior of Resists for Nanoimprint Lithography
title_full_unstemmed Burger Model as the Best Option for Modeling of Viscoelastic Behavior of Resists for Nanoimprint Lithography
title_short Burger Model as the Best Option for Modeling of Viscoelastic Behavior of Resists for Nanoimprint Lithography
title_sort burger model as the best option for modeling of viscoelastic behavior of resists for nanoimprint lithography
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34772164
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216639
work_keys_str_mv AT grzywaczhubert burgermodelasthebestoptionformodelingofviscoelasticbehaviorofresistsfornanoimprintlithography
AT jenczykpiotr burgermodelasthebestoptionformodelingofviscoelasticbehaviorofresistsfornanoimprintlithography
AT milczarekmichał burgermodelasthebestoptionformodelingofviscoelasticbehaviorofresistsfornanoimprintlithography
AT michałowskimarcin burgermodelasthebestoptionformodelingofviscoelasticbehaviorofresistsfornanoimprintlithography
AT jarzabekdariuszm burgermodelasthebestoptionformodelingofviscoelasticbehaviorofresistsfornanoimprintlithography