Cargando…
Burger Model as the Best Option for Modeling of Viscoelastic Behavior of Resists for Nanoimprint Lithography
In this study, Atomic Force Microscopy-based nanoindentation (AFM-NI) with diamond-like carbon (DLC) coated tip was used to analyze the mechanical response of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) thin films (thicknesses: 235 and 513 nm) on a silicon substrate. Then, Oliver and Pharr (OP) model was used...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34772164 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216639 |
_version_ | 1784598305845542912 |
---|---|
author | Grzywacz, Hubert Jenczyk, Piotr Milczarek, Michał Michałowski, Marcin Jarząbek, Dariusz M. |
author_facet | Grzywacz, Hubert Jenczyk, Piotr Milczarek, Michał Michałowski, Marcin Jarząbek, Dariusz M. |
author_sort | Grzywacz, Hubert |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, Atomic Force Microscopy-based nanoindentation (AFM-NI) with diamond-like carbon (DLC) coated tip was used to analyze the mechanical response of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) thin films (thicknesses: 235 and 513 nm) on a silicon substrate. Then, Oliver and Pharr (OP) model was used to calculate hardness and Young’s modulus, while three different Static Linear Solid models were used to fit the creep curve and measure creep compliance, Young’s modulus, and viscosity. Values were compared with each other, and the best-suited method was suggested. The impact of four temperatures below the glass transition temperature and varied indentation depth on the mechanical properties has been analyzed. The results show high sensitivity on experiment parameters and there is a clear difference between thin and thick film. According to the requirements in the nanoimprint lithography (NIL), the ratio of hardness at demolding temperature to viscosity at molding temperature was introduced as a simple parameter for prediction of resist suitability for NIL. Finally, thinner PMMA film was tentatively attributed as more suitable for NIL. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8587944 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85879442021-11-13 Burger Model as the Best Option for Modeling of Viscoelastic Behavior of Resists for Nanoimprint Lithography Grzywacz, Hubert Jenczyk, Piotr Milczarek, Michał Michałowski, Marcin Jarząbek, Dariusz M. Materials (Basel) Article In this study, Atomic Force Microscopy-based nanoindentation (AFM-NI) with diamond-like carbon (DLC) coated tip was used to analyze the mechanical response of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) thin films (thicknesses: 235 and 513 nm) on a silicon substrate. Then, Oliver and Pharr (OP) model was used to calculate hardness and Young’s modulus, while three different Static Linear Solid models were used to fit the creep curve and measure creep compliance, Young’s modulus, and viscosity. Values were compared with each other, and the best-suited method was suggested. The impact of four temperatures below the glass transition temperature and varied indentation depth on the mechanical properties has been analyzed. The results show high sensitivity on experiment parameters and there is a clear difference between thin and thick film. According to the requirements in the nanoimprint lithography (NIL), the ratio of hardness at demolding temperature to viscosity at molding temperature was introduced as a simple parameter for prediction of resist suitability for NIL. Finally, thinner PMMA film was tentatively attributed as more suitable for NIL. MDPI 2021-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8587944/ /pubmed/34772164 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216639 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Grzywacz, Hubert Jenczyk, Piotr Milczarek, Michał Michałowski, Marcin Jarząbek, Dariusz M. Burger Model as the Best Option for Modeling of Viscoelastic Behavior of Resists for Nanoimprint Lithography |
title | Burger Model as the Best Option for Modeling of Viscoelastic Behavior of Resists for Nanoimprint Lithography |
title_full | Burger Model as the Best Option for Modeling of Viscoelastic Behavior of Resists for Nanoimprint Lithography |
title_fullStr | Burger Model as the Best Option for Modeling of Viscoelastic Behavior of Resists for Nanoimprint Lithography |
title_full_unstemmed | Burger Model as the Best Option for Modeling of Viscoelastic Behavior of Resists for Nanoimprint Lithography |
title_short | Burger Model as the Best Option for Modeling of Viscoelastic Behavior of Resists for Nanoimprint Lithography |
title_sort | burger model as the best option for modeling of viscoelastic behavior of resists for nanoimprint lithography |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34772164 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216639 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grzywaczhubert burgermodelasthebestoptionformodelingofviscoelasticbehaviorofresistsfornanoimprintlithography AT jenczykpiotr burgermodelasthebestoptionformodelingofviscoelasticbehaviorofresistsfornanoimprintlithography AT milczarekmichał burgermodelasthebestoptionformodelingofviscoelasticbehaviorofresistsfornanoimprintlithography AT michałowskimarcin burgermodelasthebestoptionformodelingofviscoelasticbehaviorofresistsfornanoimprintlithography AT jarzabekdariuszm burgermodelasthebestoptionformodelingofviscoelasticbehaviorofresistsfornanoimprintlithography |