Cargando…

Research Note: Effects of cage and floor rearing systems on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in small-sized meat ducks

This study was performed to evaluate the effects of different rearing methods on the growth performance, carcass yield, and meat quality of small-sized meat ducks. A total of 420 healthy 21-day-old birds was randomly allocated to 2 treatment groups (6 replicates per treatment, sex ratio 1/1) and sub...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bai, H., Yang, B., Dong, Z., Li, X., Song, Q., Jiang, Y., Chang, G., Chen, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34788710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101520
_version_ 1784599258626785280
author Bai, H.
Yang, B.
Dong, Z.
Li, X.
Song, Q.
Jiang, Y.
Chang, G.
Chen, G.
author_facet Bai, H.
Yang, B.
Dong, Z.
Li, X.
Song, Q.
Jiang, Y.
Chang, G.
Chen, G.
author_sort Bai, H.
collection PubMed
description This study was performed to evaluate the effects of different rearing methods on the growth performance, carcass yield, and meat quality of small-sized meat ducks. A total of 420 healthy 21-day-old birds was randomly allocated to 2 treatment groups (6 replicates per treatment, sex ratio 1/1) and subjected to 2 rearing methods (furnished cage and plastic wire-floor) until d 63. Growth performance was measured in all birds. Three males and 3 females from each replicate were randomly selected and evaluated to determine the carcass yield and meat quality. In terms of growth performance, the rearing method affected the final body weight, average daily feed intake, and average daily gain, which were higher in the cage group (P < 0.05) than in the floor group, with a similar feed/gain in both groups. For slaughter performance, ducks in the cage group showed a higher abdominal fat yield and lower gizzard yield than those in the floor group (P < 0.05). For meat quality, the L* value of the breast muscle was higher in the cage group than in the floor group (P < 0.05). The pH recorded at 1 h was lower and pH recorded at 24 h was higher in the cage group (P < 0.05). The shear force and water loss rate were both lower in the cage group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the moisture content was lower and intramuscular fat content was higher in ducks fed in cages (P < 0.05). Our results indicate that the cage rearing system improved the growth performance and meat quality of ducks, which is appropriate for small-sized meat ducks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8591506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85915062021-11-22 Research Note: Effects of cage and floor rearing systems on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in small-sized meat ducks Bai, H. Yang, B. Dong, Z. Li, X. Song, Q. Jiang, Y. Chang, G. Chen, G. Poult Sci MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION This study was performed to evaluate the effects of different rearing methods on the growth performance, carcass yield, and meat quality of small-sized meat ducks. A total of 420 healthy 21-day-old birds was randomly allocated to 2 treatment groups (6 replicates per treatment, sex ratio 1/1) and subjected to 2 rearing methods (furnished cage and plastic wire-floor) until d 63. Growth performance was measured in all birds. Three males and 3 females from each replicate were randomly selected and evaluated to determine the carcass yield and meat quality. In terms of growth performance, the rearing method affected the final body weight, average daily feed intake, and average daily gain, which were higher in the cage group (P < 0.05) than in the floor group, with a similar feed/gain in both groups. For slaughter performance, ducks in the cage group showed a higher abdominal fat yield and lower gizzard yield than those in the floor group (P < 0.05). For meat quality, the L* value of the breast muscle was higher in the cage group than in the floor group (P < 0.05). The pH recorded at 1 h was lower and pH recorded at 24 h was higher in the cage group (P < 0.05). The shear force and water loss rate were both lower in the cage group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the moisture content was lower and intramuscular fat content was higher in ducks fed in cages (P < 0.05). Our results indicate that the cage rearing system improved the growth performance and meat quality of ducks, which is appropriate for small-sized meat ducks. Elsevier 2021-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8591506/ /pubmed/34788710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101520 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION
Bai, H.
Yang, B.
Dong, Z.
Li, X.
Song, Q.
Jiang, Y.
Chang, G.
Chen, G.
Research Note: Effects of cage and floor rearing systems on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in small-sized meat ducks
title Research Note: Effects of cage and floor rearing systems on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in small-sized meat ducks
title_full Research Note: Effects of cage and floor rearing systems on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in small-sized meat ducks
title_fullStr Research Note: Effects of cage and floor rearing systems on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in small-sized meat ducks
title_full_unstemmed Research Note: Effects of cage and floor rearing systems on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in small-sized meat ducks
title_short Research Note: Effects of cage and floor rearing systems on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in small-sized meat ducks
title_sort research note: effects of cage and floor rearing systems on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in small-sized meat ducks
topic MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34788710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101520
work_keys_str_mv AT baih researchnoteeffectsofcageandfloorrearingsystemsongrowthperformancecarcasstraitsandmeatqualityinsmallsizedmeatducks
AT yangb researchnoteeffectsofcageandfloorrearingsystemsongrowthperformancecarcasstraitsandmeatqualityinsmallsizedmeatducks
AT dongz researchnoteeffectsofcageandfloorrearingsystemsongrowthperformancecarcasstraitsandmeatqualityinsmallsizedmeatducks
AT lix researchnoteeffectsofcageandfloorrearingsystemsongrowthperformancecarcasstraitsandmeatqualityinsmallsizedmeatducks
AT songq researchnoteeffectsofcageandfloorrearingsystemsongrowthperformancecarcasstraitsandmeatqualityinsmallsizedmeatducks
AT jiangy researchnoteeffectsofcageandfloorrearingsystemsongrowthperformancecarcasstraitsandmeatqualityinsmallsizedmeatducks
AT changg researchnoteeffectsofcageandfloorrearingsystemsongrowthperformancecarcasstraitsandmeatqualityinsmallsizedmeatducks
AT cheng researchnoteeffectsofcageandfloorrearingsystemsongrowthperformancecarcasstraitsandmeatqualityinsmallsizedmeatducks