Cargando…

Development and evaluation of clinical reasoning using ‘think aloud’ approach in pharmacy undergraduates – A mixed-methods study

INTRODUCTION: Given the widespread use of clinical reasoning (CR) in the healthcare practice, it is essential to inculcate the CR practice in undergraduate pharmacy education which can not only facilitate their clinical education and clinical rotations but can also help them become better clinical p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Altalhi, Faisal, Altalhi, Abdulrhman, Magliah, Ziad, Abushal, Zaid, Althaqafi, Anas, Falemban, Azzam, Cheema, Ejaz, Dehele, Inderpal, Ali, Majid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34819786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2021.10.003
_version_ 1784600302689714176
author Altalhi, Faisal
Altalhi, Abdulrhman
Magliah, Ziad
Abushal, Zaid
Althaqafi, Anas
Falemban, Azzam
Cheema, Ejaz
Dehele, Inderpal
Ali, Majid
author_facet Altalhi, Faisal
Altalhi, Abdulrhman
Magliah, Ziad
Abushal, Zaid
Althaqafi, Anas
Falemban, Azzam
Cheema, Ejaz
Dehele, Inderpal
Ali, Majid
author_sort Altalhi, Faisal
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Given the widespread use of clinical reasoning (CR) in the healthcare practice, it is essential to inculcate the CR practice in undergraduate pharmacy education which can not only facilitate their clinical education and clinical rotations but can also help them become better clinical pharmacists. There is very limited CR employed in the pharmacy curriculum and practice in the Middle East countries. This study aimed to develop and evaluate CR practice in pharmacy undergraduates in one college of pharmacy in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: We employed a mixed-methods methodology that included two phases. In Phase I, students were introduced to CR practice (‘think aloud’ method) and given geriatric clinical cases which they used in two sessions together with a tutor. This was followed by the writing of SOAP notes using the tutor feedback and completion of a survey that included a self-reflection about their experience of using the CR method. Phase II included face-to-face semi-structured interviews involving selected students that were recruited via convenience sampling to further explore the issues identified in Phase I of the study. RESULTS: Of the 155 students who completed the survey (response rate 94%), the majority of them agreed that CR using the ‘think aloud’ method was useful in gathering (92%) and interpreting (95%) relevant patient information, identifying medication-related problems (95%), exploring therapeutic options for the problem(s) (93%) and formulating a treatment plan for the patient (90%). Qualitative data analysis of the 12 interviews was consistent with these findings. Furthermore, it provided an insight into the challenges faced by the students in applying this CR method. CONCLUSIONS: Students found the practice of CR using the ‘think aloud’ method helpful in working through given cases and taking clinical decisions. This method can be widely employed in pharmacy education and practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8596158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85961582021-11-23 Development and evaluation of clinical reasoning using ‘think aloud’ approach in pharmacy undergraduates – A mixed-methods study Altalhi, Faisal Altalhi, Abdulrhman Magliah, Ziad Abushal, Zaid Althaqafi, Anas Falemban, Azzam Cheema, Ejaz Dehele, Inderpal Ali, Majid Saudi Pharm J Original Article INTRODUCTION: Given the widespread use of clinical reasoning (CR) in the healthcare practice, it is essential to inculcate the CR practice in undergraduate pharmacy education which can not only facilitate their clinical education and clinical rotations but can also help them become better clinical pharmacists. There is very limited CR employed in the pharmacy curriculum and practice in the Middle East countries. This study aimed to develop and evaluate CR practice in pharmacy undergraduates in one college of pharmacy in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: We employed a mixed-methods methodology that included two phases. In Phase I, students were introduced to CR practice (‘think aloud’ method) and given geriatric clinical cases which they used in two sessions together with a tutor. This was followed by the writing of SOAP notes using the tutor feedback and completion of a survey that included a self-reflection about their experience of using the CR method. Phase II included face-to-face semi-structured interviews involving selected students that were recruited via convenience sampling to further explore the issues identified in Phase I of the study. RESULTS: Of the 155 students who completed the survey (response rate 94%), the majority of them agreed that CR using the ‘think aloud’ method was useful in gathering (92%) and interpreting (95%) relevant patient information, identifying medication-related problems (95%), exploring therapeutic options for the problem(s) (93%) and formulating a treatment plan for the patient (90%). Qualitative data analysis of the 12 interviews was consistent with these findings. Furthermore, it provided an insight into the challenges faced by the students in applying this CR method. CONCLUSIONS: Students found the practice of CR using the ‘think aloud’ method helpful in working through given cases and taking clinical decisions. This method can be widely employed in pharmacy education and practice. Elsevier 2021-11 2021-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8596158/ /pubmed/34819786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2021.10.003 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Altalhi, Faisal
Altalhi, Abdulrhman
Magliah, Ziad
Abushal, Zaid
Althaqafi, Anas
Falemban, Azzam
Cheema, Ejaz
Dehele, Inderpal
Ali, Majid
Development and evaluation of clinical reasoning using ‘think aloud’ approach in pharmacy undergraduates – A mixed-methods study
title Development and evaluation of clinical reasoning using ‘think aloud’ approach in pharmacy undergraduates – A mixed-methods study
title_full Development and evaluation of clinical reasoning using ‘think aloud’ approach in pharmacy undergraduates – A mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Development and evaluation of clinical reasoning using ‘think aloud’ approach in pharmacy undergraduates – A mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Development and evaluation of clinical reasoning using ‘think aloud’ approach in pharmacy undergraduates – A mixed-methods study
title_short Development and evaluation of clinical reasoning using ‘think aloud’ approach in pharmacy undergraduates – A mixed-methods study
title_sort development and evaluation of clinical reasoning using ‘think aloud’ approach in pharmacy undergraduates – a mixed-methods study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34819786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2021.10.003
work_keys_str_mv AT altalhifaisal developmentandevaluationofclinicalreasoningusingthinkaloudapproachinpharmacyundergraduatesamixedmethodsstudy
AT altalhiabdulrhman developmentandevaluationofclinicalreasoningusingthinkaloudapproachinpharmacyundergraduatesamixedmethodsstudy
AT magliahziad developmentandevaluationofclinicalreasoningusingthinkaloudapproachinpharmacyundergraduatesamixedmethodsstudy
AT abushalzaid developmentandevaluationofclinicalreasoningusingthinkaloudapproachinpharmacyundergraduatesamixedmethodsstudy
AT althaqafianas developmentandevaluationofclinicalreasoningusingthinkaloudapproachinpharmacyundergraduatesamixedmethodsstudy
AT falembanazzam developmentandevaluationofclinicalreasoningusingthinkaloudapproachinpharmacyundergraduatesamixedmethodsstudy
AT cheemaejaz developmentandevaluationofclinicalreasoningusingthinkaloudapproachinpharmacyundergraduatesamixedmethodsstudy
AT deheleinderpal developmentandevaluationofclinicalreasoningusingthinkaloudapproachinpharmacyundergraduatesamixedmethodsstudy
AT alimajid developmentandevaluationofclinicalreasoningusingthinkaloudapproachinpharmacyundergraduatesamixedmethodsstudy